| name | product-ops-review |
| description | Review Workstream changes for project manager, worker, reviewer, operator, payment, revision, and audit workflow correctness. |
Product/Ops Review
Review the change from the perspective of people operating Workstream.
Focus
- project manager setup flow
- worker task claiming and submission flow
- reviewer packet and finding flow
- revision loop clarity
- checker results and operator actions
- payment and reputation records
- auditability and evidence availability
- wording consistency with
README.md, docs/glossary.md, and docs/architecture_lockdown.md
- confusing names, vague statuses, or role ambiguity
Rules
- Treat naming drift as a real product risk.
- Do not approve a flow that requires chat memory or Slack memory to understand.
- Do not collapse worker-facing decisions with internal checker states.
- Confirm user-facing review decisions remain
accept, needs_revision, and reject.
- Confirm out-of-band guidance becomes a guide, policy, template, checker, or ADR before it is enforceable.
Output
Result: PASS / PASS WITH LOW RISKS / FAIL
Operator workflow risks:
Worker/reviewer workflow risks:
Payment/reputation risks:
Naming or wording drift:
Required fixes:
