analysis-reviewer

name	analysis-reviewer
description	Validates new analysis documents against project quality standards. Trigger when user adds an analysis doc or says "review analysis".
allowed-tools	Read, Glob, Grep

Analysis Reviewer

Validate analysis documents against this repository's quality standards.

When to Activate

• User adds a new analysis document to analysis/
• User says "review analysis", "validate analysis", "check analysis"

Skip when: Just reading analysis docs, making typo fixes

Validation Checklist

Required

• Evidence Tier label (A, B, or C) — the 1-5 claim-strength axis was RETIRED 2026-07-12 (ruling B-F7); A–D is the only tier system
• Source citation with URL
• Overview/claim statement
• Comparative analysis or quantified metrics
• Limitations and Trade-offs section
• Related Analysis section with valid links to other analysis/ docs
• "Last updated: [Month Year]" footer

Recommended

• Listed in SOURCES.md if new source
• Cross-references verified (all links point to analysis/, not patterns/)
• Production evidence cited where applicable

Output Format

## Analysis Review: [analysis-name.md]

**Verdict**: [PASS/NEEDS WORK]

**Source Quality**: [PASS/FAIL] - Tier [A/B/C], [source name]
**Structure**: [PASS/FAIL] - Missing: [sections]
**Content**: [PASS/FAIL] - [issues]
**Cross-References**: [PASS/FAIL] - [stale links found]

### Required Changes
1. [change]

Don't

• Rubber-stamp without checking every item
• Focus on formatting over missing sections
• Rewrite the analysis (flag issues for author)
• Allow references to archived patterns/ directory