fosmvvm-serverrequest-generator

name	fosmvvm-serverrequest-generator
description	Generate FOSMVVM ServerRequest types for CRUD operations and client-server communication. Scaffolds requests, response bodies, and typed error handling.
homepage	https://github.com/foscomputerservices/FOSUtilities
metadata	{"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🔌","os":["darwin","linux"]}}

FOSMVVM ServerRequest Generator

Generate ServerRequest types for client-server communication.

Architecture context: See FOSMVVMArchitecture.md | OpenClaw reference

API catalog: check ../shared/api-catalog/FOSMVVM.md § Protocols and ../shared/api-catalog/FOSFoundation.md § Coding, § Networking before hand-writing helpers.

---

STOP AND READ THIS

ServerRequest is THE way to communicate with an FOSMVVM server. No exceptions.

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 ALL CLIENTS USE ServerRequest                         │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                       │
│  iOS App:         Button tap    →  request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)   │
│  macOS App:       Button tap    →  request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)   │
│  WebApp:          JS → WebApp   →  request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)   │
│  CLI Tool:        main()        →  request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)   │
│  Data Collector:  timer/event   →  request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)   │
│  Background Job:  cron trigger  →  request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)   │
│                                                                       │
│  MVVMEnvironment holds: baseURL, headers, version, error handling     │
│  Configure ONCE at startup, use EVERYWHERE via processRequest()       │
│                                                                       │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

What You Must NEVER Do

// ❌ WRONG - hardcoded URL
let url = URL(string: "http://server/api/users/123")!
var request = URLRequest(url: url)

// ❌ WRONG - string path
try await client.get("/api/users/\(id)")

// ❌ WRONG - manual JSON encoding
let json = try JSONEncoder().encode(body)
request.httpBody = json

// ❌ WRONG - hardcoded fetch path
fetch('/api/users/123')

// ❌ WRONG - constructing URLs manually
fetch(`/api/ideas/${ideaId}/move`)

What You Must ALWAYS Do

Step 1: Configure MVVMEnvironment once at startup

// CLI tool, background job, data collector - configure at startup
// Import your shared module to get SystemVersion.currentApplicationVersion
import ViewModels  // ← Your shared module (see FOSMVVMArchitecture.md)

let mvvmEnv = await MVVMEnvironment(
    currentVersion: .currentApplicationVersion,  // From shared module
    appBundle: Bundle.module,
    deploymentURLs: [.debug: URL(string: "http://localhost:8080")!]
)
// NOTE: Version headers (X-FOS-Version) are AUTOMATIC via SystemVersion.current

The shared module contains SystemVersion+App.swift:

// In your shared ViewModels module
public extension SystemVersion {
    static var currentApplicationVersion: Self { .v1_0 }
    static var v1_0: Self { .init(major: 1, minor: 0, patch: 0) }
}

Step 2: Use processRequest(mvvmEnv:) everywhere

// ✅ RIGHT - ServerRequest with MVVMEnvironment
let request = UserShowRequest(query: .init(userId: id))
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
let user = request.responseBody

// ✅ RIGHT - Create operation
let createRequest = IdeaCreateRequest(requestBody: .init(content: content))
try await createRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
let newId = createRequest.responseBody?.id

// ✅ RIGHT - Update operation
let updateRequest = IdeaMoveRequest(requestBody: .init(ideaId: id, newStatus: status))
try await updateRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)

The path is derived from the type name. The HTTP method comes from the protocol. You NEVER write URL strings. Configuration lives in MVVMEnvironment - you NEVER pass baseURL/headers to individual requests.

---

When to Use This Skill

• Implementing any client-server communication
• Adding CRUD operations (Create, Read, Update, Delete)
• Building data collectors or sync tools
• Any Swift code that needs to talk to the server

If you're about to write URLRequest or a hardcoded path string, STOP and use this skill instead.

---

What ServerRequest Provides

Concern	How ServerRequest Handles It
URL Path	Derived from type name via Self.path (e.g., IdeaMoveRequest → /idea_move)
HTTP Method	Determined by action.httpMethod (ShowRequest=GET, CreateRequest=POST, etc.)
Request Body	RequestBody type, automatically JSON encoded via requestBody?.toJSONData()
Response Body	ResponseBody type, automatically JSON decoded into responseBody
Error Response	ResponseError type — the operation's thrown error carried across the wire; processRequest rethrows it client-side (see below)
Validation	RequestBody: ValidatableModel for write operations
Body Size Limits	RequestBody.maxBodySize for large uploads (files, images)
Type Safety	Compiler enforces correct types throughout

---

ResponseError Is the Operation's Throw, Not a Status Mapping

If there were no wire, the operation would be a local function call that throws a well-defined Swift error. ResponseError is that error. ServerRequestError (Error, Codable, Sendable) exists so the throw can happen across the wire:

• The server-side handler throws the typed error
• It rides the response as Codable (via ErrorMiddleware)
• The client's processRequest rethrows the same typed error, as if the call had been local

Design from the throw, never from the transport:

• ✅ Ask: "what would this operation throw if it were local?" — that error (usually an enum-carrying struct) is the ResponseError
• ❌ Never ask: "what should a 401 / an HTTP status become?" — statuses are transport dressing; they carry no result semantics
• Clients branch by catching the typed case — never by reading an HTTP status back

Why this protects encapsulation: an HTTP status is a raw, publicly-mintable number — any failure can wear a 401, so routing result semantics on one is the stringly-typed encapsulation break (see SOLID / encapsulation in CLAUDE.md). The typed error IS the contract; the moment a client sniffs a status, the error vocabulary you declared stops being the only door.

---

Request Protocol Selection

Choose based on the operation:

Operation	Protocol	HTTP Method	RequestBody Required?
Read data	ShowRequest	GET	No
Read ViewModel	ViewModelRequest	GET	No
Create entity	CreateRequest	POST	Yes (ValidatableModel)
Update entity	UpdateRequest	PATCH	Yes (ValidatableModel)
Replace entity	(use .replace action)	PUT	Yes
Soft delete	DeleteRequest	DELETE	No
Hard delete	DestroyRequest	DELETE	No

The left column is the protocol you conform to (CreateRequest, UpdateRequest, …). That is NOT the name of your concrete type — see naming below.

---

Naming the Concrete Request Type

Concrete write/action requests are noun-first: <Noun><Verb>Request.

Operation	✅ Concrete type	❌ Not
Create a User	UserCreateRequest	CreateUserRequest
Update a User	UserUpdateRequest	UpdateUserRequest
Replace a User (PUT)	UserReplaceRequest	ReplaceUserRequest
Delete a User	UserDeleteRequest	DeleteUserRequest
Semantic action	IdeaMoveRequest	MoveIdeaRequest
Raw-data read	UserShowRequest	—

Noun-first keeps an entity's whole request family cohesive and sortable (UserCreateRequest/UserDeleteRequest/UserShowRequest/UserUpdateRequest group together) — an SRP win, and it matches the already-noun-first ShowRequest form. ViewModel read requests drop the verb entirely (DocksRequest, not DocksShowRequest).

Full rules and rationale: Naming Dictionary.

---

What This Skill Generates

Core Files (Always)

File	Location	Purpose
{Action}Request.swift	{ViewModelsTarget}/Requests/	The ServerRequest type
{Action}Controller.swift	{WebServerTarget}/Controllers/	Server-side handler

Optional: WebApp Bridge (for web clients)

File	Purpose
WebApp route	Bridges JS fetch to ServerRequest.fetch()
JS handler guidance	How to invoke from browser

---

How to Use This Skill

Invocation: /fosmvvm-serverrequest-generator

Prerequisites:

• Operation requirements understood from conversation context
• RequestBody and ResponseBody structures discussed or documented
• Client type identified (iOS app, WebApp, CLI tool, background job, etc.)

Workflow integration: This skill is typically used when implementing client-server communication. The skill references conversation context automatically—no file paths or Q&A needed. Often follows fosmvvm-viewmodel-generator (for ResponseBody ViewModels) and fosmvvm-fields-generator (for RequestBody validation).

Pattern Implementation

This skill references conversation context to determine ServerRequest structure:

Operation Type Detection

From conversation context, the skill identifies:

• CRUD operation (create, read, update, delete)
• HTTP semantics (GET for read, POST for create, PATCH/PUT for update, DELETE for delete)
• Protocol choice (ShowRequest, ViewModelRequest, CreateRequest, UpdateRequest, DeleteRequest)

Request Structure Design

From requirements already in context:

• RequestBody fields (what data the client sends)
• Query parameters (URL query string data)
• Fragment parameters (URL fragment/anchor data)
• Validation requirements (ValidatableModel for write operations)

Response Structure Design

From requirements already in context:

• ResponseBody type (often a ViewModel, sometimes just an ID)
• ResponseError type — ask "what would this operation throw if it were a local call?"; that error is the ResponseError (EmptyError if nothing well-defined). Never derive it from HTTP statuses.
• Success scenarios (what indicates successful operation)
• Error scenarios (known failure modes the client must branch on — each becomes a typed case the client catches)

Client Detection

From conversation context:

• Target platform (iOS/macOS app, WebApp browser, CLI tool, background job)
• Bridge requirements (whether WebApp route needed for browser clients)
• MVVMEnvironment setup (how client configures baseURL and headers)

File Generation

Core files:

1. ServerRequest type with RequestBody, ResponseBody, ResponseError
2. Controller with action handler
3. Route registration

Optional (for WebApp clients): 4. WebApp route bridging JS to ServerRequest 5. JavaScript handler guidance

Context Sources

Skill references information from:

• Prior conversation: Operation requirements, data structures discussed
• Specification files: If Claude has read API specs or feature docs into context
• Existing patterns: From codebase analysis of similar requests

---

ServerRequest Type Template

// {Action}Request.swift
import FOSMVVM

public final class {Action}Request: {Protocol}, @unchecked Sendable {
    public typealias Query = EmptyQuery       // or custom Query type
    public typealias Fragment = EmptyFragment
    // ResponseError: use EmptyError OR define nested ResponseError struct (see below)

    public let requestBody: RequestBody?
    public var responseBody: ResponseBody?

    // What the client sends
    public struct RequestBody: ServerRequestBody, ValidatableModel {
        // Fields...
    }

    // What the server returns
    public struct ResponseBody: {Protocol}ResponseBody {
        // Fields (often contains a ViewModel)
    }

    // Optional: Custom error type (nested, not top-level!)
    // public struct ResponseError: ServerRequestError { ... }

    public init(
        query: Query? = nil,
        fragment: Fragment? = nil,
        requestBody: RequestBody? = nil,
        responseBody: ResponseBody? = nil
    ) {
        self.requestBody = requestBody
        self.responseBody = responseBody
    }
}

Note: All subtypes (RequestBody, ResponseBody, ResponseError) are nested inside the request class. This avoids namespace pollution and provides unique YAML localization keys automatically.

Controller Template

Controller action = Protocol name (minus "Request")

Protocol	Action	HTTP Method
ShowRequest	.show	GET
ViewModelRequest	.show	GET
CreateRequest	.create	POST
UpdateRequest	.update	PATCH
DeleteRequest	.delete	DELETE
DestroyRequest	.destroy	DELETE
Custom request	Whatever fits your semantics	Depends on action

The pattern is mechanical: UpdateRequest → .update. CreateRequest → .create. Just match the names.

// {Action}Controller.swift
import Vapor
import FOSMVVM
import FOSMVVMVapor

final class {Action}Controller: ServerRequestController {
    typealias TRequest = {Action}Request

    let actions: [ServerRequestAction: ActionProcessor] = [
        .{action}: {Action}Request.performAction
    ]
}

private extension {Action}Request {
    static func performAction(
        _ request: Vapor.Request,
        _ serverRequest: {Action}Request,
        _ requestBody: RequestBody
    ) async throws -> ResponseBody {
        let db = request.db

        // 1. Fetch/validate
        // 2. Perform operation
        // 3. Build response (often a ViewModel)

        return .init(...)
    }
}

Controller Registration

// In WebServer routes.swift
try versionedGroup.register(collection: {Action}Controller())

Client Invocation

All Swift clients (iOS, macOS, CLI, background jobs, etc.):

// MVVMEnvironment configured once at app/tool startup (see "What You Must ALWAYS Do")
let request = {Action}Request(requestBody: .init(...))
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
let result = request.responseBody

WebApp (browser clients): See WebApp Bridge Pattern below.

---

WebApp Bridge Pattern

When the client is a web browser, you need a bridge between JavaScript and ServerRequest:

Browser                    WebApp (Swift)                      WebServer
   │                            │                                  │
   │  POST /action-name         │                                  │
   │  (JSON body)               │                                  │
   │ ─────────────────────────► │                                  │
   │                            │  request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)│
   │                            │ ────────────────────────────────►│
   │                            │ ◄────────────────────────────────│
   │  ◄──────────────────────── │  (ResponseBody)                  │
   │  (HTML fragment or JSON)   │                                  │

The WebApp route is internal wiring - it's how browsers invoke ServerRequest, just like a button tap invokes it in iOS.

WebApp Route

// WebApp routes.swift
app.post("{action-name}") { req async throws -> Response in
    // 1. Decode what JS sent
    let body = try req.content.decode({Action}Request.RequestBody.self)

    // 2. Call server via ServerRequest (NOT hardcoded URL!)
    // mvvmEnv is configured at WebApp startup
    let serverRequest = {Action}Request(requestBody: body)
    try await serverRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv: req.application.mvvmEnv)

    // 3. Return response (HTML fragment or JSON)
    guard let response = serverRequest.responseBody else {
        throw Abort(.internalServerError, reason: "No response from server")
    }
    // ...
}

JavaScript Handler

async function handle{Action}(data) {
    const response = await fetch('/{action-name}', {
        method: 'POST',
        headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
        body: JSON.stringify(data)
    });
    // Handle response...
}

Note: The JS fetches to the WebApp (same origin), which then uses ServerRequest to talk to the WebServer. The browser NEVER talks directly to the WebServer.

---

Common Patterns

ViewModel Response

Most operations return a ViewModel for UI update:

public struct ResponseBody: UpdateResponseBody {
    public let viewModel: IdeaCardViewModel
}

ID-Only Response

Some operations just need confirmation:

public struct ResponseBody: CreateResponseBody {
    public let id: ModelIdType
}

Empty Response

Delete operations often return nothing:

// Use EmptyBody as ResponseBody
public typealias ResponseBody = EmptyBody

---

ResponseError - Typed Error Handling

Each ServerRequest can define a custom ResponseError type for structured error responses from the server.

How It Works

When processing a response:

1. Framework tries to decode as ResponseBody
2. If that fails, tries to decode as ResponseError
3. If ResponseError decode succeeds, that error is thrown
4. Client catches with try/catch at the call site

When to Use Custom ResponseError

Use custom ResponseError when:

• Operation has known failure modes (validation, quota, permissions)
• Server returns structured error details (field names, error codes)
• Client needs to take specific action based on error type
• You want field-level validation error display

Use EmptyError (default) when:

• Operation rarely fails
• Failures are exceptional (network down, server crash)
• No structured error response expected
• You only need success/failure, not why

Nesting Pattern

ResponseError MUST be nested inside the request class, just like RequestBody and ResponseBody:

public final class IdeaCreateRequest: CreateRequest, @unchecked Sendable {
    public typealias Query = EmptyQuery
    public typealias Fragment = EmptyFragment
    // No typealias needed - ResponseError is nested

    public let requestBody: RequestBody?
    public var responseBody: ResponseBody?

    // ✅ All subtypes nested inside the request
    public struct RequestBody: ServerRequestBody, ValidatableModel { ... }
    public struct ResponseBody: CreateResponseBody { ... }
    public struct ResponseError: ServerRequestError { ... }  // ← Nested, not top-level

    public init(...) { ... }
}

Why nesting matters:

• Consistent with RequestBody/ResponseBody pattern
• Avoids namespace pollution (no IdeaCreateError, IdeaMoveError, etc. at top level)
• YAML localization keys are scoped: IdeaCreateRequest.ResponseError.ErrorCode.quotaExceeded
• No need for unique type names like GovernanceLessonCreateError - nesting provides uniqueness

Pattern 1: Errors with Associated Values

For errors that need dynamic data in their messages, use LocalizableSubstitutions:

public final class IdeaCreateRequest: CreateRequest, @unchecked Sendable {
    // ... other typealiases and properties ...

    public struct ResponseError: ServerRequestError {
        public let code: ErrorCode
        public let message: LocalizableSubstitutions

        public enum ErrorCode: Codable, Sendable {
            case duplicateContent
            case quotaExceeded(requestedSize: Int, maximumSize: Int)
            case invalidCategory(category: String)

            var message: LocalizableSubstitutions {
                switch self {
                case .duplicateContent:
                    .init(
                        baseString: .localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: "duplicateContent"),
                        substitutions: [:]
                    )
                case .quotaExceeded(let requestedSize, let maximumSize):
                    .init(
                        baseString: .localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: "quotaExceeded"),
                        substitutions: [
                            "requestedSize": LocalizableInt(value: requestedSize),
                            "maximumSize": LocalizableInt(value: maximumSize)
                        ]
                    )
                case .invalidCategory(let category):
                    .init(
                        baseString: .localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: "invalidCategory"),
                        substitutions: [
                            "category": LocalizableString.constant(category)
                        ]
                    )
                }
            }
        }

        public init(code: ErrorCode) {
            self.code = code
            self.message = code.message  // Required to localize properly via Codable
        }
    }
}

en:
  IdeaCreateRequest:
    ResponseError:
      ErrorCode:
        duplicateContent: "The requested content is a duplicate of an existing idea."
        quotaExceeded: "The requested content size %{requestedSize} exceeds the maximum allowed size %{maximumSize}."
        invalidCategory: "The category %{category} is not valid."

Pattern 2: Simple Errors (String-Based Codes)

For simpler errors without associated values, use a String raw value enum:

public final class IdeaMoveRequest: UpdateRequest, @unchecked Sendable {
    // ... other typealiases and properties ...

    public struct ResponseError: ServerRequestError {
        public let code: ErrorCode
        public let message: LocalizableString

        public enum ErrorCode: String, Codable, Sendable {
            case ideaNotFound
            case invalidTransition

            var message: LocalizableString {
                .localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: rawValue)
            }
        }

        public init(code: ErrorCode) {
            self.code = code
            self.message = code.message  // Required to localize properly via Codable
        }
    }
}

en:
  IdeaMoveRequest:
    ResponseError:
      ErrorCode:
        ideaNotFound: "The idea was not found"
        invalidTransition: "Cannot move to the requested status"

Type Safety Means You Already Know

STOP. Before you panic about "how do I know what error type I have?"

This isn't JavaScript. The type system tells you everything at compile time:

// When you write this request...
let request = IdeaMoveRequest(requestBody: body)

// ...you KNOW:
// - IdeaMoveRequest.ResponseError exists (it's declared in the type)
// - It has exactly the cases you defined (ideaNotFound, invalidTransition)
// - Each case has whatever properties you gave it

// So when you catch, you catch THE SPECIFIC TYPE:
do {
    try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
} catch let error as IdeaMoveRequest.ResponseError {
    // I KNOW this is IdeaMoveRequest.ResponseError
    // I KNOW it has .code
    // I KNOW .code is ErrorCode enum with ideaNotFound, invalidTransition
    // No mystery. No runtime discovery. No "what if?"
}

The anti-pattern (JavaScript brain):

// ❌ WRONG - treating typed errors as unknown
catch let error as ServerRequestError {
    // "How do I get the message? What properties does it have?"
    // This thinking is WRONG. You're not in a typeless world.
}

The pattern (Swift brain):

// ✅ RIGHT - you know the exact type
catch let error as IdeaMoveRequest.ResponseError {
    switch error.code {
    case .ideaNotFound: // I know this exists
    case .invalidTransition: // I know this exists
    }
}

The ServerRequestError protocol is a marker (Error, Codable, Sendable). It doesn't guarantee properties because it doesn't need to - you catch the concrete type, not the protocol.

Client Error Handling

The primary pattern is try/catch at the call site:

do {
    try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
} catch let error as IdeaCreateError {
    switch error.code {
    case .duplicateContent:
        showDuplicateWarning(message: error.message)
    case .quotaExceeded(let requestedSize, let maximumSize):
        showQuotaError(requested: requestedSize, maximum: maximumSize, message: error.message)
    case .invalidCategory(let category):
        highlightInvalidCategory(category, message: error.message)
    }
} catch {
    showGenericError(error)
}

Built-in ValidationError

FOSMVVM provides ValidationError for field-level validation failures:

// In controller - use Validations to collect errors
let validations = Validations()

if requestBody.email.isEmpty {
    validations.validations.append(.init(
        status: .error,
        fieldId: "email",
        message: .localized(for: UserCreateRequest.self, propertyName: "emailRequired")
    ))
}

// Throw if any errors
if let error = validations.validationError {
    throw error
}

// Client catches ValidationError
catch let error as ValidationError {
    for validation in error.validations {
        for message in validation.messages {
            for fieldId in message.fieldIds {
                formFields[fieldId]?.showError(message.message)
            }
        }
    }
}

Architecture context: See ServerRequestError - Typed Error Responses for full details.

---

Testing ServerRequests

Always test via ServerRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) - never via manual HTTP.

See fosmvvm-serverrequest-test-generator for complete testing guidance.

// ✅ RIGHT - tests the actual client code path
let request = {Entity}UpdateRequest(
    query: .init(entityId: id),
    requestBody: .init(name: "New Name")
)
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: testMvvmEnv)
#expect(request.responseBody?.viewModel.name == "New Name")

// ❌ WRONG - manual HTTP bypasses version negotiation
try await app.sendRequest(.PATCH, "/entity/\(id)", body: json)

---

See Also

• Naming Dictionary - Canonical rules for naming requests (noun-first) and types
• Architecture Patterns - Mental models (errors are data, type safety, etc.)
• FOSMVVMArchitecture.md - Full architecture, especially "Core Principle: ServerRequest Is THE Way"
• fosmvvm-serverrequest-test-generator - For testing ServerRequest types
• fosmvvm-viewmodel-generator - For ViewModels returned by requests
• fosmvvm-fields-generator - For ValidatableModel in RequestBody
• fosmvvm-leaf-view-generator - For Leaf templates that render ViewModels
• reference.md - Complete file templates

---

Version History

Version	Date	Changes
1.0	2025-12-24	Initial Kairos-specific skill
2.0	2025-12-26	Complete rewrite: top-down architecture focus, "ServerRequest Is THE Way" principle, generalized from Kairos, WebApp bridge as platform pattern
2.1	2025-12-27	MVVMEnvironment is THE configuration holder for all clients (CLI, iOS, macOS, etc.) - not raw baseURL/headers. DRY principle enforcement.
2.2	2025-12-27	Added shared module pattern - SystemVersion.currentApplicationVersion from shared module, reference to FOSMVVMArchitecture.md
2.3	2025-12-27	Added ServerRequestBodySize for large upload body size limits (maxBodySize on RequestBody)
2.4	2026-01-08	Added controller action mapping table, testing section with reference to test generator skill
2.5	2026-01-08	Simplified action mapping: "action = protocol name minus Request". Removed drama, just state the pattern.
2.6	2026-01-09	Added ResponseError section with two patterns: associated values (LocalizableSubstitutions) and simple string codes (LocalizableString). Added YAML examples and built-in ValidationError usage.
2.7	2026-01-20	ResponseError MUST be nested inside request class (like RequestBody/ResponseBody). Updated patterns to show nesting with correct YAML key paths.
2.8	2026-01-20	Added "Type Safety Means You Already Know" section - explicit mental model that Swift's type system means you catch concrete error types, not protocols. Prevents JavaScript-brain panic about runtime type discovery.
2.9	2026-01-24	Update to context-aware approach (remove file-parsing/Q&A). Skill references conversation context instead of asking questions or accepting file paths.
2.10	2026-07-02	Concrete request types are noun-first (<Noun><Verb>Request); added "Naming the Concrete Request Type" section + Naming Dictionary cross-ref; flipped all verb-first examples (CreateIdeaRequest→IdeaCreateRequest, MoveIdeaRequest→IdeaMoveRequest, etc.). (backlog A1)