| name | intent-to-mission-blueprint |
| description | Convert human operational intent into a Tandem mission blueprint with phased workstreams, explicit handoffs, reusable outputs, and recurrence-aware setup. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| tags | ["tandem","mission","workflow","orchestration","autonomy"] |
| compatibility | tandem |
Intent To Mission Blueprint
Purpose
Use this skill when a human describes an ongoing operational goal and you need to turn that intent into a Tandem MissionBlueprint.
This skill is specifically for translating human intent into:
- a mission goal
- success criteria
- shared context
- workstreams
- dependencies
- output contracts
- review or approval gates
- recurrence-aware setup
It is not for executing the mission itself.
What Good Output Looks Like
Return one mission blueprint only.
The blueprint should be:
- staged
- scoped
- operationally understandable
- safe for long-running reuse
- concrete enough to compile without hand-waving
The result should feel like something an operator could schedule and trust, not a brainstorming outline.
Core Translation Rule
Translate the user’s intent into the smallest coherent staged mission.
Do not:
- explode one intent into ten weak stages
- collapse everything into one vague workstream
- create review gates everywhere
- treat raw intermediate output as reusable truth
How To Interpret Human Intent
1. Find the real mission outcome
Convert vague requests into one concrete shared outcome.
Example:
- Human intent: "keep the team updated on important operational changes every morning"
- Mission goal: "Produce a reviewed daily operations update with validated changes, recommended actions, and an operator-ready handoff."
2. Find the repeated operating loop
Most long-running missions follow one of a few durable shapes:
- monitor -> analyze -> decide -> handoff
- intake -> plan -> execute -> verify -> review
- collect -> consolidate -> update state -> notify
Choose the smallest loop that matches the intent.
3. Identify the real handoffs
Each downstream stage should consume a clear upstream output.
Use depends_on and input_refs only where the handoff is real.
4. Design for recurrence
If the mission will run daily, weekly, or continuously:
- prefer stable artifacts
- make later stages reuse validated upstream work
- avoid forcing broad rediscovery every run
- include review or approval only where trust actually matters
5. Keep promoted outputs distinct from raw working state
Do not design the mission so every stage treats draft notes as durable truth.
Instead:
- discovery stages produce working artifacts
- synthesis or execution stages produce decision-ready artifacts
- review or approval stages determine what is ready for downstream reuse
Mission Authoring Rules
Goal
The mission goal should describe the end state, not the implementation steps.
Success criteria
Use measurable or inspectable checks.
Good:
- "Final handoff identifies validated changes, required decisions, and clear next actions."
Weak:
- "Mission is helpful and thorough."
Shared context
Include only stable mission-wide constraints:
- audience
- deadlines
- allowed sources
- risk constraints
- compliance or review rules
- quality bar
- cadence assumptions
Workstreams
Each workstream must have:
- one responsibility
- one main artifact or result
- a clear prompt
- bounded scope
Review stages
Add review, test, or approval stages only when they:
- protect downstream trust
- control promotion or delivery
- validate external action readiness
- catch failures that earlier stages are likely to miss
Long-Running Mission Guidance
When the intent implies recurring operation over weeks or months:
- assume project-scoped knowledge reuse
- keep trust floor at promoted by default
- design stages so later runs can build on validated outputs
- avoid requiring every run to rediscover unchanged context
- keep stages inspectable and repairable
Default Staged Patterns
Pattern 1: Monitor -> Analyze -> Decide -> Handoff
Use for:
- operational monitoring
- workflow surveillance
- recurring change detection
- market or environment tracking
Pattern 2: Intake -> Plan -> Execute -> Verify -> Review
Use for:
- execution pipelines
- implementation work
- structured project delivery
- repeated operational processing
Pattern 3: Collect -> Consolidate -> Update State -> Notify
Use for:
- recurring state refresh
- knowledge or system updates
- periodic status synthesis
- publish/update loops
Prompt-Writing Standard For Workstreams
Every workstream prompt should include:
- role
- local mission
- allowed inputs
- output contract
- guardrails
Good prompt skeleton:
Act as the [role]. Use the named upstream inputs and approved workspace context only. Produce the required output in a form the next stage can consume directly. Preserve relevant evidence, avoid redoing upstream work, and record uncertainty or blockers explicitly.
Output Rules
Return valid YAML only.
Include:
id
label
description
schedule_defaults
blueprint
The blueprint must contain:
mission_id
title
goal
success_criteria
shared_context
workspace_root
phases
milestones
team
workstreams
review_stages
Strong Final Meta-Prompt
Use this when asked to generate a Tandem mission blueprint from human intent:
Convert the following human operational intent into one Tandem mission blueprint.
Requirements:
- Return YAML only.
- Produce one shared mission goal.
- Use the smallest coherent staged mission shape.
- Give each workstream one clear responsibility.
- Use explicit dependencies and input refs only for real handoffs.
- Every workstream must have a concrete prompt and output contract.
- Design for recurring execution when the intent implies daily, weekly, or long-running operation.
- Default to project-scoped promoted knowledge reuse through validated outputs.
- Add review or approval gates only where they materially improve trust, verification, or promotion control.
- Avoid vague stages, vague prompts, and vague outputs.
Human intent:
[insert intent]
Constraints:
[insert constraints]
Preferred workspace root:
[insert workspace root]
Preferred cadence:
[insert cadence]