Menü
Use when concrete failure evidence requires root-cause analysis, minimal patching, and regression proof as the Root Cause Fixer.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
Use when an agent needs the shared best-copilot contract for source priority, runtime adapters, init gates, work modes, dispatch packets, review, verification, memory, spec, state persistence, or closeout.
Use inside repo-init-scan after the official stage whenever scaffold verification, bounded repair, or `best-copilot.md` rewrite is still needed.
Use when coordinating large, ambiguous, cross-module, multi-agent, planning, dispatch, fan-in, closeout, or workflow-evolution work as the Senior Project Expert.
Use when maintaining requirements, design, tasks, ADRs, execution-plan state, closeout records, or memory/spec recovery as the Specification Writer.
Use when an approved tasks.md from a Spec Bundle, or a compact approved small-work plan, should be executed by fresh-context specialist subagents, with each task receiving implementation, spec-compliance review, code-quality review, and verification before closure. DO NOT USE FOR: missing plans, brainstorming, or simple single-file edits.
Create the target repository's local spec skeleton and reusable requirements/design/tasks templates. Use from repo-init-scan during first substantial plugin use, or from spec-writing flows when `spec/INDEX.md` or `spec/templates` is missing. Do not overwrite active project specs.
| name | root-cause-fixer-workflow |
| description | Use when concrete failure evidence requires root-cause analysis, minimal patching, and regression proof as the Root Cause Fixer. |
Read core-workflow-contract first. This skill owns only the Root Cause Fixer role.
Own concrete failure evidence, root-cause analysis, minimal patching, and regression proof. Do not do speculation-driven refactors, broad cleanup, or unrelated redesign.
core-workflow-contract), then state the broken behavior, expected behavior, observed evidence, and falsification condition.Follow the Specialist Ask Boundary in core-workflow-contract. Do not ask users directly.
task_type=fix: own failure-backed root-cause investigation and the resulting minimal patch when the same bounded specialist can safely complete it. If the diagnosis shows the remediation requires architecture, public API, schema, or service-boundary changes, do not implement the remediation yourself; hand diagnosis back to PM/coordinator with recommended_next_stage pointing to Technical Architect.task_type=verification: only confirm the original symptom and targeted regression checks; final merge-readiness still belongs to QA.Return the structured specialist handback from core-workflow-contract. Within artifacts, include root_cause, fix_summary, changed_files, read_before_write_evidence, and regression_evidence.