Apply modern authentication standards instead of historical mistakes. Covers NIST 800-63B-aligned passphrase policy (no rotation theatre), MFA enforcement and factor tiering, session versus JWT tradeoffs, OAuth scope minimization, and account lockout that does not enable enumeration. Invoke when building auth from scratch, planning MFA rollout, or handling a credential-stuffing wave.
Installation
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Apply modern authentication standards instead of historical mistakes. Covers NIST 800-63B-aligned passphrase policy (no rotation theatre), MFA enforcement and factor tiering, session versus JWT tradeoffs, OAuth scope minimization, and account lockout that does not enable enumeration. Invoke when building auth from scratch, planning MFA rollout, or handling a credential-stuffing wave.
Auth Hardening
Authentication is where almost every public-facing app eventually gets attacked. The good news: a small set of patterns covers most of the threat surface, and the worst practices (password rotation every 90 days, "security questions") are actively harmful.
This skill is opinionated. The opinions track NIST SP 800-63B, OWASP ASVS, and industry consensus circa 2026.
When to invoke
Building auth from scratch
Reviewing an existing auth system before scaling user count
Handling a credential-stuffing wave or a brute-force surge
Planning MFA rollout for staff or customers
After a password-reset abuse incident or account-takeover report
Migrating from sessions to JWT (or back)
Password policy — what to require, what to drop
Require:
Minimum length 12 characters, no maximum below 64. Length beats complexity.
Allow all printable characters and spaces — including emoji and unicode. Reject only NULL bytes.
Check against breached-password lists at signup and reset. Use Have I Been Pwned's k-anonymity range API (only first 5 chars of hash leave your server).
Drop:
No mandatory rotation. NIST 800-63B explicitly removed periodic rotation in 2017 because it produces predictable patterns (Password1! → Password2!).
No composition rules ("must contain a symbol"). They reduce entropy by making patterns predictable.
No security questions. Mother's maiden name is on LinkedIn. Pet's name is on Instagram.
No password hints stored anywhere users have ever seen them.
Rotation IS appropriate after: known compromise of the credential, MFA enrollment lapse, or staff offboarding.
Password storage
Argon2id is the recommended default (memory-hard, side-channel resistant). Tune memory ≥ 64 MB, parallelism 1, iterations to hit ~250–500ms per hash on your hardware.
bcrypt still acceptable (cost ≥ 12) — most languages have mature libraries.
scrypt acceptable but less ergonomic than Argon2.
Never roll your own. Even SHA-256 + salt is wrong here — too fast, GPU-friendly.
Re-hash on login when parameters change (you'll bump cost as hardware improves). Take the hit during the user's session, not in a batch job.
MFA — when to require, what to accept
Tier by risk:
Admin / staff — required, hardware key (WebAuthn) or TOTP only. SMS not acceptable for staff.
Customers managing money / sensitive data — strongly recommended, optionally required. WebAuthn / TOTP. SMS as fallback only.
General customers — optional but well-promoted. Any second factor better than none.
Recommended factors, in order:
WebAuthn / passkeys — phishing-resistant, no shared secret. The right default in 2026.
TOTP via authenticator app — well-supported, no carrier dependency.
Recovery codes — single-use, generated at MFA enrollment, must be stored by the user. Avoid recovery via "email a code" alone (that just makes email the actual factor).
SMS / voice — last resort, susceptible to SIM swap. Note in your threat model.
Implementation gotchas:
Allow multiple second factors per user (so losing one device doesn't lock them out)
"Trusted device" cookies should expire (30 days max), be revocable from the user's settings, and require re-MFA on sensitive actions
Never accept the same TOTP code twice in its 30-second window (mark-as-used in cache)
Session cookies vs JWT
Most apps should use server-side sessions with HTTP-only cookies, not JWT.
Server sessions (cookie)
JWT (Authorization header)
Revocation
Trivial — delete the session row
Hard — JWT is self-contained, requires denylist or short TTL + refresh dance
Storage
Small cookie + DB / Redis lookup
All claims travel in the token, can bloat to KB
Cross-domain
Same-origin or strict CORS
Easier across services / mobile apps
Theft impact
Cookie + same domain only (with SameSite)
Token usable from anywhere until expiry
For web apps with a single backend, sessions win. For multi-service / mobile API backends, JWT can pay off if you accept the operational complexity.
If you use JWT:
Sign with EdDSA / Ed25519 or RS256. Avoid HS256 unless you have one signer and one verifier and they can share a secret safely.
Set short access-token TTL (15 min), longer refresh-token TTL (days/weeks), refresh tokens are opaque random and stored server-side so you can revoke them.
Validate iss, aud, exp, nbf strictly on every request.
Never let the alg header decide. Pin the expected algorithm in your verifier — the alg: none family of attacks lives here.
Cookie attributes (whether sessions or refresh tokens):
SameSite=Strict is more secure but breaks "login then click email link". Lax is the right default. None only with explicit need + Secure.
OAuth scope minimization
When integrating "Sign in with Google / GitHub":
Request only the scopes you need. "Sign in" needs email/profile. Asking for repo or gmail.send for a sign-in flow is a red flag (and users notice).
Validate state and nonce on every callback. CSRF is real here.
Validate the ID token signature — never just trust the email field. Use the provider's JWKS and the same JWT discipline above.
Verify email_verified: true for any flow that auto-links to existing accounts by email.
Bind the OAuth identity to your user record by stable provider-issued sub (not email — emails change).
Account lockout vs enumeration
The naive lockout (5 failures → lock account 30 min) creates two problems:
Username enumeration: attacker probes 100 usernames, sees which ones get locked → those exist.
Self-DoS: attacker locks your real users' accounts at will.
Modern pattern:
Per-IP rate limit on login (e.g. 10/min). Stops dumb brute-force without locking targeted users.
Per-account exponential backoff on bad password — pauses adding 1s, 2s, 4s, 8s. Cap at 60s. Survives the wave without locking accounts.
Generic error message: "incorrect email or password". Never "no user with that email."
CAPTCHA challenge after N failures per IP, not a lock.
Notify the user by email after K failed attempts ("someone tried to log in") — gives users a chance to respond.
Hard lock + manual review only for clearly automated abuse (e.g. 1000 attempts/hr from one IP).
Password reset — the highest-leverage takeover vector
Most account takeovers happen through a buggy reset flow, not a password crack.
Patterns:
Reset link is single-use, expires in 15–60 min, invalidated on use OR password change OR another reset issued
Token is high-entropy (≥128 bits), server-generated, stored hashed in DB (so a DB read doesn't enable resets)
Reset email goes only to the email on file — never accept a new email in the reset request
After successful reset, invalidate all existing sessions for that user
Generic response on reset request: "if an account with that email exists, we sent a reset link". Do not confirm existence.
Rate-limit reset requests per email + per IP (caps spam + enumeration via timing)
MFA does not bypass on reset. If the user has MFA enrolled, the reset flow requires MFA too (or a separate recovery code), otherwise reset becomes the MFA bypass.
Email change flow — also a takeover vector
Less obvious than password reset, but equally important:
Verify both addresses — old and new. Confirmation link to the new address activates it; notification to the old address with a "this wasn't me, revert" link.
48-hour grace period during which the old email can revert the change. Stops attackers who get a session cookie, change the email, then change the password.
Require current password (and MFA if enrolled) to initiate the change.
Breached credential detection
Have I Been Pwned's Pwned Passwords API lets you check candidate passwords without sending them anywhere. K-anonymity range model: hash the password, send the first 5 chars of the SHA-1 hex, receive back ~500 hashes with that prefix, check locally if your full hash matches.
Use it at:
Signup — reject the worst breached passwords
Password change — same
Periodic scan of stored hashes is not possible (they're hashed with a strong scheme — you cannot reverse), so this is a flow-time check
Audit log
Authentication events deserve their own log stream. Capture, at minimum:
Retention 12 months is a reasonable default. Surface these in a user-facing "recent activity" view — users catch their own compromises faster than you will.
Quick checklist
For an auth system going to production:
Minimum 12-char passwords, no max <64, all characters allowed
Breached-password check at signup and change
Argon2id (or bcrypt cost ≥12) for storage
MFA available; required for admin/staff
WebAuthn supported, not just TOTP
Recovery codes generated, displayed once
HttpOnly + Secure + SameSite cookies
Generic error messages, no enumeration
Per-IP rate limit + per-account exponential backoff (no naive lockout)
Password reset: single-use, short TTL, hashed in DB, invalidates sessions on success
Email change: verify both ends, grace period, current-password required
Audit log of auth events, user-visible "recent activity"
OAuth: minimum scopes, strict state/nonce, ID token verified, email_verified checked
No security questions, no rotation cadence, no password hints
What this skill will not do
Recommend SMS as a primary factor for any staff account
Endorse "must change password every 90 days" policies
Help build authentication for systems you do not own
