| name | judgment-day |
| description | Trigger: judgment day, dual review, adversarial review, juzgar. Run blind dual review, fix confirmed issues, then re-judge. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | {"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.4"} |
Activation Contract
Load this skill only when the user explicitly asks for Judgment Day, dual/adversarial review, or equivalent Spanish trigger (juzgar, que lo juzguen). Review a specific target: files, feature, PR, or architecture slice.
Hard Rules
- Resolve project skills before launching agents: read skill registry, match compact rules by target files/task, and inject the same
Project Standards block into both judge prompts and fix prompts.
- Launch two blind judges in parallel with identical target and criteria; never review the code yourself.
- Wait for both judges before synthesis; never accept a partial verdict.
- Classify warnings as
WARNING (real) only if normal intended use can trigger them; otherwise downgrade to INFO as WARNING (theoretical).
- Ask before fixing Round 1 confirmed issues.
- After any fix agent runs, immediately re-launch both judges in parallel before commit/push/done/session summary.
- Terminal states are only
JUDGMENT: APPROVED or JUDGMENT: ESCALATED.
- After 2 fix iterations with remaining issues, ask the user whether to continue.
Decision Gates
| Condition | Action |
|---|
| Target unclear | Ask for scope; do not launch judges. |
| No skill registry | Warn, proceed with generic criteria, and record Skill Resolution: none. |
| Both judges find same CRITICAL/real WARNING | Confirmed; ask/fix according to round rules. |
| One judge finds issue | Suspect; report and triage, do not auto-fix. |
| Judges contradict | Escalate for manual decision. |
| Round 2+ has only theoretical warnings/suggestions | Report as INFO; do not re-judge. |
Execution Steps
- Confirm target and optional custom criteria.
- Resolve compact project standards from registry or warn if missing.
- Start Judge A and Judge B concurrently via delegation.
- Synthesize findings into confirmed, suspect, contradiction, and INFO buckets.
- Ask before Round 1 fixes; delegate a separate fix agent for confirmed approved fixes only.
- Re-judge in parallel after fixes; repeat until approved, escalated, or user asks to stop.
- Before any terminal action, verify every active Judgment Day has a terminal state.
Output Contract
Return ## Judgment Day — {target} with round number, verdict table, confirmed/suspect/contradiction counts, fixes applied, re-judgment result, Skill Resolution, and final JUDGMENT: APPROVED ✅ or JUDGMENT: ESCALATED ⚠️.
References
