Designs novel molecules using REINVENT 4 (de novo, scaffold decoration, linker design, R-group, molecular optimization), MolMIM, Diffusion-based generators (DiGress, DiffSMol), and JT-VAE with explicit handling of multi-parameter optimization (MPO), goal-directed scoring functions, transfer/reinforcement/curriculum learning, synthetic accessibility scoring, and chemical space exploration vs exploitation. Use when designing new chemical matter against a target, decorating a scaffold, linking fragments, or optimizing a hit for multiple ADMET / activity properties simultaneously.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Designs novel molecules using REINVENT 4 (de novo, scaffold decoration, linker design, R-group, molecular optimization), MolMIM, Diffusion-based generators (DiGress, DiffSMol), and JT-VAE with explicit handling of multi-parameter optimization (MPO), goal-directed scoring functions, transfer/reinforcement/curriculum learning, synthetic accessibility scoring, and chemical space exploration vs exploitation. Use when designing new chemical matter against a target, decorating a scaffold, linking fragments, or optimizing a hit for multiple ADMET / activity properties simultaneously.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed
package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
Generative Molecular Design
Generate novel molecules biased toward desired properties using deep generative models. REINVENT 4 (Loeffler et al. 2024, AstraZeneca) provides four generator families: Reinvent (de novo), Libinvent (scaffold decoration and library design), Linkinvent (linker design), and Mol2Mol (similarity-constrained molecular optimization). These support design tasks including R-group replacement and scaffold hopping and can be used with transfer learning, reinforcement learning, and curriculum learning. For specific niches: MolMIM (NVIDIA BioNeMo) for latent-space property optimization, DiffSMol / DiGress for diffusion-based generation, and JT-VAE for latent-space optimization. The art of generative design is in the : poorly-designed scoring rewards uninteresting molecules, while well-designed scoring captures both activity and developability.
scoring function
For QSAR/scoring models that feed generative design, see chemoinformatics/qsar-modeling. For synthetic feasibility, see chemoinformatics/retrosynthesis. For library enumeration as alternative, see chemoinformatics/reaction-enumeration.
Validated geometry/ternary-complex evidence; no generic DC50 surrogate
Lead optimization MPO
Molecular optimization
CL with staged constraints
Multi-task: activity + ADMET
Diverse hit set
De novo with diversity bonus
RL + Tanimoto distance to known
Activity + diversity
Patent space carve-out
Constrained de novo
RL + structural constraints
Activity + novelty
Hit-to-lead
R-group replacement
TL on lead + RL
Activity + Lipinski
ADMET-aware design
De novo or optimization
RL
hERG + CYP + AMES + QED
REINVENT 4 Setup
REINVENT 4 uses a TOML configuration file specifying generator, algorithm, prior model, and scoring functions.
Goal: Configure a reinforcement-learning REINVENT 4 run with a prior, agent, sampling parameters, and a QED scoring component.
Approach: Build a release-matched REINVENT 4 staged-learning TOML config with [parameters] for the prior/agent checkpoints, [[stage]] blocks, and one or more [[stage.scoring.component]] blocks. Validate the config with the installed release because component parameters evolve between versions.
# The REINVENT 4 CLI binary is `reinvent` (not `reinvent4`).
reinvent -l logfile.log config.toml
Output: a live stage CSV using summary_csv_prefix, plus the configured chkpt_file at stage termination or graceful interruption. Post-process the CSV to select molecules; REINVENT does not emit a checkpoint and SMILES file at every iteration by default.
Goal: Build a multi-component generative reward that balances predicted activity, drug-likeness, synthesizability, and novelty.
Approach: Combine a QSAR sigmoid on pIC50, QED, SA-score reverse-sigmoid, and Tanimoto-similarity reverse-sigmoid via geometric mean so any zero component zeroes the total.
In REINVENT 4, define these under the active stage's [stage.scoring] section, with each component using the exact component and endpoint tables from the installed release's configuration examples. Do not reuse REINVENT 3 [scoring_function] or [[scoring_function.components]] syntax in a REINVENT 4 config. The accompanying example is deliberately limited to built-in, documented component structure; add predictive-property endpoints only after validating their release-specific model-container parameters.
geometric_mean ensures all components must be reasonably high (one zero -> zero total). arithmetic_mean allows compensation.
Multi-Parameter Optimization (MPO)
Lead optimization commonly involves multiple objectives. The following component types illustrate a project-specific scoring design; weights and transforms must be fit to the actual assays and decision context.
Component
Weight
Transformation
Target activity (predicted pIC50)
0.3
sigmoid 5-8
Selectivity (off-target ratio)
0.2
sigmoid 1-100
QED
0.1
identity
Synthetic accessibility (SA score)
0.1
reverse sigmoid 1-4
hERG predicted prob
0.1
reverse sigmoid 0.3-0.7
AMES predicted prob
0.1
reverse sigmoid 0.3-0.7
Tanimoto novelty vs known
0.1
reverse sigmoid 0.4-0.6
The weights and transformation bounds above are repository starting examples only. Normalize weights as required by the selected aggregation and tune every bound against project assay distributions and prospective behavior.
Reward Hacking (Production Pitfall)
RL agents will find ways to maximize reward without learning the intended behavior:
Trivial scaffolds that score high on QED
Repeat structural motifs that game similarity scoring
Out-of-distribution molecules that exploit QSAR overconfidence
Trivial SMILES (e.g., "CCC...C") that match generic scoring
Mitigations:
Include one or more synthesis-aware signals when they have been validated for the project; SA score alone does not establish route feasibility
Use ensemble QSAR with uncertainty (penalize high-uncertainty predictions)
Include diversity bonus (Tanimoto to reference)
Add fingerprint similarity penalty within batch (prevent mode collapse)
Validate generated samples on held-out QSAR test set
from rdkit.Contrib.SA_Score import sascorer
from rdkit import Chem
defsa_score(smi):
mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
if mol isNone:
returnNonereturn sascorer.calculateScore(mol)
sascorer is shipped in RDKit Contrib in current RDKit distributions. Use the namespaced import above; do not install an unrelated top-level package.
The score is a 1-to-10 heuristic derived from fragment contributions and molecular complexity, with lower values intended to indicate easier synthesis. It is not a route planner, cost estimate, or calibrated feasibility probability. Use it as one audited reward component or annotation, never as an absolute filter.
Diffusion-Based Generation (Modern Alternatives)
Tool
Approach
Strength
Status
DiGress (Vignac 2023)
Discrete diffusion on graphs
Conditional generation
Public
DiffSMol (Chen 2025)
Equivariant diffusion
3D molecule generation
Public
MolDiff (Peng 2023)
Full-atom diffusion
Joint atom/bond generation
Public
TargetDiff (Guan 2023)
Pocket-conditioned equivariant diffusion
Structure-based design
Public
Diffusion models iteratively denoise molecular representations, whereas REINVENT generators autoregressively construct SMILES. Diversity, validity, and drug-likeness depend on the model, training data, conditioning, and evaluation protocol; compare them on a matched benchmark for the intended task.
Constrained / Goal-Directed Generation
Goal: Enforce hard structural requirements (e.g., must contain hydroxyl) and exclude PAINS without letting constraint satisfaction game the reward.
Approach: Stage transfer learning then RL. In REINVENT 4, CustomAlerts is a global structural-alert filter: a match produces zero and it is applied before score aggregation. MatchingSubstructure is a scoring component (1 for a match and 0.5 otherwise), so it is a soft penalty rather than a hard inclusion constraint. Apply a separate post-generation SMARTS validation step when presence of a feature is mandatory.
There is no REINVENT 4 filter_only option for these components. Treat structural alerts as triage flags where appropriate, and separately verify any true hard inclusion or exclusion rule on the generated structures.
MolMIM (NVIDIA BioNeMo)
MolMIM encodes SMILES into a learned latent space, uses gradient-free CMA-ES to optimize a user-defined property objective, and decodes candidate molecules.
# Pseudo-code; requires NVIDIA NIM access# from bionemo.molmim import MolMIMOptimizer# optimizer = MolMIMOptimizer(model="molmim-property-optimizer")# optimized = optimizer.optimize(seed_smiles, target_property="logp", target_value=2.0)
Tradeoffs against REINVENT depend on the oracle budget, objective, and implementation; benchmark both under matched constraints when selecting a generator.
Per-Tool Failure Modes
REINVENT RL -- mode collapse
Trigger: The reward, learning strategy, or diversity control favors a narrow chemotype.
Mechanism: Agent finds a high-scoring local maximum and stops exploring.
Symptom: Diversity and scaffold coverage collapse relative to a project-defined baseline while reward continues to rise.
Fix: Add diversity bonus to scoring; reduce sigma; reset agent if collapsed.
REINVENT TL -- overfitting
Trigger: Transfer learning data are too small or homogeneous for the intended generalization task.
Mechanism: Generator memorizes training set; no generalization.
Symptom: Generated molecules near-identical to training set actives.
Fix: Use larger training set; mix with diverse external sample; apply RL after TL.
Generated molecule unsynthesizable
Trigger: SA score missing from reward.
Mechanism: The reward omits synthesis evidence, allowing candidates with no plausible validated route to score well.
Follow that model release's documented preprocessing and limits
MolMIM cold-start slow
Latent search exhaustiveness
Reduce search budget
Optimization converges trivially
Reward gradient dominated by one term
Use geometric_mean; rebalance weights
References
Loeffler et al., J. Cheminformatics 16:20 (2024) -- REINVENT 4 framework and four generator families (DOI 10.1186/s13321-024-00812-5).
Olivecrona M et al., J. Cheminformatics 9:48 (2017) -- REINVENT original (DOI 10.1186/s13321-017-0235-x).
Vignac et al., ICLR (2023) -- DiGress discrete diffusion.
Chen H et al., Nat. Mach. Intell. 7:758-770 (2025) -- DiffSMol structure-based 3D molecular generation (DOI 10.1038/s42256-025-01030-w).
Peng X, Guan J, Liu Q, Ma J. Proc. ICML, PMLR 202:27611-27629 (2023) -- MolDiff full-atom molecular diffusion.
Guan J et al., ICLR (2023) -- TargetDiff pocket-conditioned 3D equivariant diffusion (OpenReview: kJqXEPXMsE0).
Reidenbach D, Livne M, Ilango RK, Gill M, Israeli J. MLDD Workshop at ICLR (2023) -- MolMIM and CMA-ES latent-space optimization (OpenReview: iOJlwUTUyrN).
Jin W, Barzilay R, Jaakkola T. Proc. ICML, PMLR 80:2323-2332 (2018) -- JT-VAE junction-tree.
Ertl P, Schuffenhauer A. J. Cheminformatics 1:8 (2009) -- SA score (DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-1-8).
