Menü
Record stakeholder input — new constraints, corrections, or direction changes.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
Fast pre-flight health check for all Grainulator MCP servers. Pings each server once, reports status in a table, and provides exact fix commands for any that are down. Use before starting any Grainulator session to avoid wasting time on MCP disconnections.
Generate a compiled decision brief from the current sprint's claims.
Generate a presentation deck from the compiled sprint data.
Size-efficient URL fetch with semantic extraction. Use for ad-hoc web research when you want content without the raw HTML overhead.
Corroborate a claim against an external source URL.
Intent router that detects user intent from plain messages and dispatches to the appropriate skill.
| name | feedback |
| description | Record stakeholder input — new constraints, corrections, or direction changes. |
| tools | ["mcp__wheat__wheat_add-claim","mcp__wheat__wheat_compile","mcp__wheat__wheat_search","mcp__wheat__wheat_status"] |
The user is relaying feedback from stakeholders that should be incorporated into the sprint.
$ARGUMENTS
Parse the feedback: Identify what the stakeholder said. This could be:
Create feedback claims as f### claims:
constraint for hard requirements, feedback for opinions/preferencesstated (stakeholder said it, not independently verified)Check for conflicts: Does this feedback contradict existing claims? If a stakeholder says "budget is $10K max" but research shows a solution at $15K, that's a conflict. Set conflicts_with on both claims.
Run wheat_compile to surface any new conflicts.
Print result:
Feedback recorded:
- <f001>: <summary>
- <f002>: <summary>
Conflicts introduced: <N>
Next steps:
/resolve -- resolve any new conflicts
/research <topic> -- investigate new questions from feedback
/challenge <id> -- test if feedback contradicts existing evidence