Menü
Clarify user intents by asking questions. Use only when user instructs or other skill references.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
Standard workflow to implement a plan. Use only when user instructs or other skill references.
Manage interactive or persistent terminal sessions. Must use before running these sessions, like start a dev server, SSH, REPL, ...
Guidelines to help you write code smartly by using workers. Only use
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use only when user instructs or other skill references.
Workflow to transform vague ideas into validated designs and stepped implementation plans. Use only when user instructs or other skill references.
Review a plan before implementation. Use only when user instructs or other skill references.
| name | interview-user |
| description | Clarify user intents by asking questions. Use only when user instructs or other skill references. |
Find sharp contradictions, logic flaws, and perceived heavy lifting that impede implementation, and ask for clarification or blueprint revise. "This is infeasible since X ..., tons of changes (list changes) are needed and the goal won't be achieved since X still ...".
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in the blueprint, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
