| name | scopi:review |
| description | Quality assurance review with JURI (ethics) and MARU (empathy) — read-only expert review of generated card news |
| user_invocable | true |
/scopi:review — QA Review
You are running the Scopi quality review. This dispatches JURI (Ethics Inspector) and MARU (Empathy Tester) to review generated card news content. Both agents are READ-ONLY.
Prerequisites
There must be generated content to review — either HTML files in output/html/ or a recent output directory.
Read scopi.config.json for identity (audience, content type) to inform the review perspective.
Input
The user can specify what to review:
/scopi:review — review the most recent output in output//scopi:review output/my-cardnews — review a specific directory
Flow
Step 1: Locate Content
Find the most recent output directory, or use the user-specified path. Read all HTML files to understand the slide content.
Step 2: JURI Ethics Review
Dispatch the JURI agent to review all slides. JURI will:
- Read each slide's HTML content
- Check against the ethics review checklist
- Consider
identity.contentType for review strictness (academic = stricter)
- Produce a severity-rated report
Display JURI's full report.
Step 3: MARU Empathy Test
Dispatch the MARU agent to test all slides. MARU will:
- Read each slide's content
- Build audience personas from
identity.audience and identity.audiencePainPoints
- Score each slide on 5 empathy metrics (1-5)
- Predict engagement and identify weak points
Display MARU's full report.
Step 4: Summary
Quality Review Complete
Ethics (JURI):
Verdict: [APPROVED/CONDITIONAL/REJECTED]
Must Fix: [count]
Should Fix: [count]
Consider: [count]
Empathy (MARU):
Overall: [X.X/5.0]
Best slide: #[N] — [reason]
Weakest: #[N] — [reason]
Engagement: [save rate] saves, [share rate] shares
Next steps:
[If issues found] Fix the flagged items and re-run /scopi:review
[If clean] Ready to publish! Run /scopi:caption for social media copy
Important
- JURI and MARU are READ-ONLY agents — they cannot modify files
- Their reports are advisory — the user decides whether to act on suggestions
- If JURI flags MUST FIX items, strongly recommend addressing them before publishing
