Menü
INVOKE BEFORE EVERY NON-TRIVIAL TASK — before writing code, before using any tool, before answering. Do not skip. Produces the required Skill + Agent + Model for the task. Routing engine for 2,700+ skills.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
| name | skill-router |
| description | INVOKE BEFORE EVERY NON-TRIVIAL TASK — before writing code, before using any tool, before answering. Do not skip. Produces the required Skill + Agent + Model for the task. Routing engine for 2,700+ skills. |
Output always: Skill + Agent + Model
Q1: Is something BROKEN / WRONG / FAILING?
Error, crash, test fail, unexpected output, user correction
YES → BROKEN PATH
Q2: Is this CREATE / BUILD / ADD something new?
New feature, file, component, integration, page, script
YES → BUILD PATH
Q3: Everything else (improve, ship, configure, automate, research)
→ OPERATE PATH
AMBIGUOUS? → Default to HIGHER-COMPLEXITY path
| Signal | Skill | Agent | Model | Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error / crash / exception | superpowers:systematic-debugging | general-purpose | sonnet | think |
| Test failing | test-runner → superpowers:systematic-debugging | test-runner | sonnet | none |
| TypeScript errors | typescript-expert | general-purpose | sonnet | none |
| Performance regression | perf → superpowers:systematic-debugging | optimizer | sonnet | think |
| Security issue found | security | security-auditor | sonnet | think-hard |
| Deploy / build failed | superpowers:systematic-debugging | general-purpose | sonnet | think |
| User says "no" / "wrong" | STOP → superpowers:systematic-debugging | general-purpose | sonnet | think |
| Production incident | superpowers:systematic-debugging | general-purpose | opus | ultrathink |
Multi-file / new feature: brainstorming → writing-plans → domain skill
Single file / trivial add: go directly to domain skill
| What | Skill | Agent | Model | Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UI component / page | frontend-design:frontend-design | feature-dev:code-architect | sonnet | none |
| API endpoint | feature-dev:feature-dev | feature-dev:code-architect | sonnet | think |
| Database schema | db-expert | db-expert | sonnet | think |
| Auth / permissions | brainstorming → security | security-auditor | opus | ultrathink |
| AI feature / agent | superpowers:brainstorming | feature-dev:code-architect | sonnet | think-hard |
| 3rd-party integration | connect-apps | integration-specialist | sonnet | none |
| Mobile screen | frontend-design:frontend-design | feature-dev:code-architect | sonnet | none |
| CLI / automation script | superpowers:writing-plans | general-purpose | sonnet | think |
| Skill / Claude skill file | superpowers:writing-skills | general-purpose | sonnet | think |
| Signal | Skill | Agent | Model | Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refactor / clean up | refactor | code-simplifier:code-simplifier | sonnet | none |
| Add tests / coverage | superpowers:test-driven-development | test-runner | sonnet | none |
| Performance optimize | perf | optimizer | sonnet | think |
| Write docs | docs | general-purpose | sonnet | none |
| Code review | superpowers:requesting-code-review | superpowers:code-reviewer | sonnet | think-hard |
| Got review feedback | superpowers:receiving-code-review | general-purpose | sonnet | think |
| Deploy | superpowers:verification-before-completion → vercel:deploy | general-purpose | sonnet | none |
| Merge / PR / push | superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch | general-purpose | sonnet | none |
| DB migration | db-expert | db-expert | sonnet | think |
| 2+ independent tasks | superpowers:dispatching-parallel-agents | general-purpose | sonnet | none |
| Resume previous work | superpowers:executing-plans | general-purpose | sonnet | none |
| Research / docs lookup | context7 → brainstorming | general-purpose | sonnet | none |
| Architecture / scope decision | superpowers:brainstorming → superpowers:writing-plans | general-purpose | opus | ultrathink |
Single-line fix · reading code · one factual question · one command · under 3 trivial steps
Router precision contract: when no triage signal matches (BROKEN/BUILD/OPERATE), the
router emits nothing — silence is the correct output. A missing [skill-router] line
means the prompt was conversational, exploratory, or trivial. Do not interpret silence as
"OPERATE → refactor" by default; the router only suggests when it is confident.
Explicit slash-commands stand down: if the prompt is itself a slash-command invocation
(/gstack, /ship prod, /feature-dev:feature-dev), the user has already chosen the skill.
The router emits nothing and writes no pending state — it must never reclassify an explicit
command into a different skill. (Filesystem paths like /Users/... are not commands and route
normally.)
Iron rule enforcement: when the router does announce a chain, the announcement
includes an IRON RULE block naming the next required Skill(skill="<X>") call. A
PreToolUse hook denies the source-mutating tools (Edit, Write, Task, NotebookEdit,
MultiEdit) until that skill is invoked, and a Stop hook blocks turn end if it never was.
Read/Glob/Grep/TodoWrite/Bash/Skill remain allowed so context-gathering, shell
work, and the override below still function.
Two escape hatches:
User opt-out — the USER includes [no-router] in their next message. The router
stays silent and clears pending on UserPromptSubmit, so all hooks pass through. Writing
[no-router] in your own response text does NOT clear pending — only the user's prompt
triggers the clear.
Reasoned override (model-driven, the ask+learn loop) — if you judge the announced route
wrong, don't fight the rule: run
python3 ~/.claude/skills/skill-router/scripts/router_override.py "<reason>". This clears
the pending rule for the turn, appends your reason to ~/.claude/skill_router_overrides.jsonl
for audit, and bumps a per-skill tally. After OVERRIDE_THRESHOLD reasoned overrides the
router defers that skill (announce-free) on similar prompts; a successful invoke re-arms it.
The router asks and learns from you instead of blocking you.
If the Stop hook is blocking you on a ghost skill, it self-clears on the next user message regardless (ghost-skill guard).
Calibration: tests/calibration.py runs ~100 curated prompts through the router and
reports precision/recall/F1 by triage path. Run with --min-accuracy N for a CI gate.
Current baseline: 100% path accuracy, 95.2% skill accuracy.
Learning loop: scripts/learn-from-history.py joins announcement events
(~/.claude/skill_router_log.jsonl) with actual Skill invocations (~/.claude/ skill_usage.log) and surfaces tuning suggestions — which announced skills are ignored
most often, and which Skill invocations the router missed. Run periodically to keep
patterns calibrated to real usage.
Before any "done" claim → superpowers:verification-before-completion
□ Code actually runs correctly
□ TypeScript passes (tsc --noEmit)
□ Tests pass
□ Original request fully met (re-read it)
1 domain → 1 skill → single-domain announcement
2+ domains → announce chain → multi-domain announcement
Operators in the chain:
→ sequential (B depends on A)+ parallel (steps don't share state)Full chain syntax + standard shapes: see references/multi-domain-chaining.md.
<vars>)The announcement is the testable contract. Users will grep '\[skill-router\]'
their transcript to verify what fired matches what was announced. Format is
non-negotiable. Output it BEFORE any other tool call (Read, Edit, Bash, Agent).
Single-domain (one skill, no chain):
[skill-router] This is a <BROKEN|BUILD|OPERATE> task → <skill> → <agent>.
[skill-router] Model: <model> · Thinking: <thinking>
[skill-router] Invoke now:
▶ <skill> (<model>, <in-session | via Agent>)
Multi-domain (computed chain):
[skill-router] This touches <N> domains: <d1>, <d2>, <d3>.
[skill-router] Chain: <s1> → <s2> + <s3> → <s4>
[skill-router] Models: <m1> · <m2>+<m3> · <m4> · Thinking: <max-thinking>
[skill-router] Invoke step 1/<N> now:
▶ <s1> (<m1>, <in-session | via Agent>)
▶ <s2> + <s3> (<m2>, parallel via Agent)
▶ <s4> (<m4>, <in-session | via Agent>)
Multi-domain (saved chain wins):
[skill-router] Using your saved chain `<name>`: <s1> → <s2> + <s3>
[skill-router] Models: <m1> · <m2>+<m3> · Thinking: <max-thinking>
[skill-router] Invoke step 1/<N> now:
▶ <s1> (<m1>, <in-session | via Agent>)
▶ <s2> + <s3> (<m2>, parallel via Agent)
Rules:
Models: line uses · between sequential steps and + inside one parallel step.Thinking: is the highest depth of any step (none / think / think-hard / ultrathink). Omit the field when every step is none.▶ line ends with one of: in-session, via Agent, or parallel via Agent — matching the dispatch protocol decision below.[skill-router] Step <n>/<N> done. before dispatching the next.[skill-router] Chain done.Two layers of testability — keep them aligned:
[skill-router] lines + ▶ markers are the human-readable proof in the transcript. grep '\[skill-router\]' shows what was announced; the ▶ line shows the dispatch decision the parent made.~/.claude/skill_router_log.jsonl events (chain-start, chain-step, thinking-active, chain-end) are the machine-readable proof read by scripts/audit-dispatch.py and the statusline. The ▶ line does NOT replace the JSONL chain-step event — write both. See references/dispatch-protocol.md.Skipping the announcement format = silently breaking the testability claim.
After triage, BEFORE computing fresh, check SKILL.personal.md for a
chains: block. If any when: substring matches the user's prompt
(case-insensitive, first match wins), use the saved chain instead.
When a saved chain wins, announce it with provenance:
Using your saved chain `<name>`: <step1> → <step2> + <step3>
Schema, match algorithm, per-step model resolution: references/named-chains.md.
If the table returned a generic skill (e.g. integration-specialist),
search local + remote catalogs for a more specific match. If found, use
the specialist instead.
1. Local: ls ~/.agent/skills/, ~/.claude/skills/, ~/.composio-skills/ | grep -iE '<keyword>'
2. Remote: site:github.com "SKILL.md" claude <keyword> (4 curated repos in ref doc)
3. Generate: superpowers:writing-skills (last resort)
Skip when: routing-table answer is already specialist · single-line fix · keyword is too generic ("code", "file", "text").
Full validation gates + curated repos: references/catalog-check.md, references/known-skill-repos.md.
Add project-specific routing on top of this file:
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hussi9/skill-router/main/SKILL.personal.md \
> ~/.claude/skills/skill-router/SKILL.personal.md
Edit SKILL.personal.md with your project signals. Your rules win over the core (CSS cascade model).
Pre-pend the routing row's Thinking value as the literal first word of the
dispatch prompt:
| Value | Pre-pend |
|---|---|
none | (nothing) |
think | think. |
think-hard | think hard. |
ultrathink | ultrathink. |
Do not paraphrase. If a community ultrathink / think-hard skill is
installed, invoke that skill INSTEAD of the bare keyword.
Full rules + community alternatives: references/thinking-depth.md.
This is what makes the Model column enforced, not advisory.
For each step in the announced chain:
IF step.model == parent_model AND not parallel-fan-out:
→ Skill(<skill>) in-session (cheaper, same context)
ELSE:
→ Agent(subagent_type=<agent>, model=<model>,
prompt="<thinking-keyword>. Use Skill: <skill>. Task: <slice>. Context: <files>")
Sequential `→`: wait. Parallel `+`: one message, multiple Agent calls.
After dispatching, write log lines to ~/.claude/skill_router_log.jsonl
(chain-start, chain-step, thinking-active, chain-end) for the
statusline + the scripts/audit-dispatch.py compliance auditor.
Full event schema, common skip patterns, and verification: references/dispatch-protocol.md.
"This is simple" → Simple things take 5s to route. Skip routing = hours wasted.
"I know what to do" → Then routing confirms it. 5s cost, 0 downside.
"No match in table" → Run Catalog Check above before giving up.
"Ambiguous task" → Default to higher-complexity path (BUILD).
"I already know the skill" → Still run catalog check — a better one may exist.
"I'll just paraphrase" → No. Output the [skill-router] format VERBATIM. Greppability is the contract.
"I can skip the ▶ lines" → No. Per-step ▶ lines are the dispatch-mode proof. Without them the audit script can't score the chain.