| name | writing-ui-guidance |
| description | Use when writing or changing any user-facing guidance text (tips, hints, warnings, step instructions, status messages) in the WPF app, before committing the change. Ensures critical constraints are actually seen and instructions survive skimming. |
Writing UI guidance users actually read
Users scan, they do not read. Eye tracking shows attention concentrates on the first line of a block and collapses after it (NN/g F-pattern; only ~20-28% of words on a page are read). A constraint buried mid-paragraph is functionally undocumented. These rules are evidence-backed (NN/g studies, plainlanguage.gov, ANSI Z535.6 warning anatomy, poka-yoke control hierarchy, checklist research); follow them in order.
1. Code beats text (poka-yoke hierarchy)
Before writing a sentence, ask: can the app enforce or check this itself? Validation, a pre-filled or locked field, a disabled button with a reason caption, or an inline error at the moment of the mistake ranks above ANY wording. Text is the weakest control; use it only for what software cannot know. If a constraint is checkable later (from data the app has), add the check and delete the prose.
2. One constraint, one sentence, one place
Never restate the same rule at different strengths ("300 or higher", "600 recommended", "scan at 600"). Multiple versions of one rule read as three rules and the user cannot tell which binds. Collapse to the single true rule and delete the rest. If two genuinely different rules exist (a hard requirement and an optional tip), they never share a sentence or a severity register.
3. Mandatory constraints get isolation, not prose
A must-do never lives inside a descriptive paragraph. It gets its own line, visually distinct (bold lead, warning box, or a "Required:" style marker), placed at the point of action (next to the field or button it governs), not in an upstream preamble. Anatomy when consequences matter: what to do, then what goes wrong otherwise, in that order, each one short sentence.
4. Instruction first, reason second or cut
Verb-first imperative ("Scan at 600 dpi."), rationale as a trailing clause or second short sentence only when the rule would otherwise look arbitrary. Reasons never precede or bury the instruction. Optional tips can drop the reason entirely.
5. Length ceilings
Helper text: at most two to three short sentences (NN/g caps microcopy below three sentences). Average sentence under ~20 words. One action per sentence. If a block needs more, it has more than one job: split it across the points of action, or cut.
6. Retention budget: about four items
Users retain roughly four chunks from text read once and acted on later. One core mandatory fact per step. Everything beyond the budget must be enforced in code (rule 1), moved to the point of action (rule 3), or cut (rule 2).
7. Optional depth is one click, never for essentials
Progressive disclosure (a labeled expander or tooltip) is only for depth some users want; the essential path must work with zero disclosure interactions. One level of disclosure at most, and label the trigger with what it answers ("Why this DPI?"), not a bare icon.
Checklist before committing guidance text
- Could code enforce this instead? If yes, do that and delete the text.
- Is any rule stated more than once at different strengths? Collapse.
- Is every mandatory constraint on its own line at the point of action?
- Does every sentence start with the action, one action per sentence?
- Is any block over three sentences? Split or cut.
- Would a reader who skims ONLY the first sentence of each block still succeed?
