Menü
Use when the user explicitly requests TDD, test-first, or RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, or an already-selected workflow enters its internal TDD gate; ordinary implementation remains Ralph.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
Use when the user explicitly delegates autonomous end-to-end delivery across discovery, planning, implementation, and verification; not for a small execution-ready task.
Use when the user explicitly delegates autonomous end-to-end delivery across discovery, planning, implementation, and verification; not for a small execution-ready task.
Use when requirements are sufficiently known but implementation is broad, risky, architecture-sensitive, cross-file, multi-step, or strategy-unclear and needs a plan; not for still-vague discovery or an execution-ready task.
Use when the user explicitly requests TDD, test-first, or RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, or an already-selected workflow enters its internal TDD gate; ordinary implementation remains Ralph.
Use when requirements are sufficiently known but implementation is broad, risky, architecture-sensitive, cross-file, multi-step, or strategy-unclear and needs a plan; not for still-vague discovery or an execution-ready task.
Use when an observed failure, regression, flake, unexpected output, or unknown root cause needs investigation; a known-cause execution-ready fix remains Ralph.
| name | test-driven-development |
| description | Use when the user explicitly requests TDD, test-first, or RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, or an already-selected workflow enters its internal TDD gate; ordinary implementation remains Ralph. |
| argument-hint | <explicit TDD/test-first change> |
This generated file is the Codex-facing runtime skill document. Codex should read this file directly; maintainers edit the source documents listed below instead.
Source order:
../../docs/skill-core/test-driven-development.md../../docs/platforms/codex-child-packet-floor.md../../docs/platforms/codex-runtime.mdThe sections below are already composed for this platform. Do not ask the runtime model to load another platform's runtime document or invocation syntax.
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write the smallest production change that makes it pass. Refactor only after green.
Test Driven Development is the internal mid-loop discipline for behavior-change work inside implementation and bug-fix execution.
Use it inside ralph, systematic-debugging, or ultrawork before changing production behavior. It is not a requirements, planning, cleanup, or final-verification substitute.
Do not use this skill as the top-level route for ordinary implementation
requests such as "add this feature", "fix this bug", "refactor this module",
or "implement this behavior". This is not a top-level implementation skill.
Use ralph for those concrete implementation requests so execution mode,
worktree isolation, review, cleanup, verification, and final reporting stay
attached to the work.
Use this skill as a top-level entry only when:
ralph, systematic-debugging, or
ultrawork) reaches its internal TDD gateDirect-edit-eligible mutations are inert and never reach this skill;
other small concrete edits route through ralph, which may apply its STANDARD
small-task carve-out; there is no
separate direct edit path that reaches this skill outside a workflow or an
explicit user TDD request.
After the cycle completes, return control to ralph, systematic-debugging,
or ultrawork. Do not continue as a substitute for ralph.
Use before editing production code for:
Exceptions require explicit user approval or a documented reason:
If a test harness is missing, write a verification plan before changing behavior. A missing practical harness permits a documented TDD exception plus existing real-surface, bounded manual, or residual-risk evidence; it does not authorize new durable test infrastructure or production seams unless the user separately approves that scope.
No behavior-changing production code without a failing test first.
If production behavior was changed before a failing test existed, do not treat later tests as TDD evidence. Either restart the behavior change from a failing test or document explicit user approval to continue without TDD.
Inside a dispatch-capable caller, assign one stable Executor assignment ID
to each observable behavior and keep its repository work-product writes across
RED, GREEN, and REFACTOR. Continue the same executor session when the host
supports it; a transport rebind may use one call per assigned mutation step
but must preserve and echo that assignment ID while each Packet ID remains
unique. Do not split one behavior's RED and GREEN writes across assignments.
The caller remains the orchestrator: it observes and records RED/GREEN results,
updates .oh-no evidence, validates the executor envelope, and decides every
gate. Mutation status: complete is not TDD or AC acceptance. Inline writes
are only a recorded LIGHT-tiny or dispatch-unavailable fallback inherited from
the caller's execution policy.
For each behavior-changing task, use the cycle below; step 5 is its in-cycle
REFACTOR step and follows ## Refactor Rule. A standalone behavior-preserving
refactor uses ## Refactor Integration instead, and its characterization tests
are required evidence, not optional extra cases.
For this cycle, one behavior means one observable contract change from the approved Direction Contract, not each internal branch, helper, or condition. Coupled internal conditions that serve one observable outcome may share one minimal RED; independent user-visible outcomes remain separate cycles.
Do not batch independent observable behaviors into one RED step. If the test name joins independent user-visible outcomes with "and", split the test; do not split solely because one outcome depends on coupled internal conditions.
One minimal RED/GREEN case per changed behavior is the default. Add negative, boundary, semantic-model, concurrency, resume, adversarial, or baseline cases only when an AC ID, named safety/risk trigger, adjacent regression surface, or safety invariant requires them. A reviewer may identify a verification hole; it may not demand an exhaustive matrix merely because stronger proof is imaginable.
If no approved admission source exists, record the proposed extra case as not relevant with the reason and do not implement it.
Tests stay evidence under the AC-bearing product story; do not turn test
infrastructure into a separate product story unless the user requested it as an
outcome. Do not build a product-like state machine, scheduler, protocol
simulator, Git oracle, duplicate parser, fixture factory, or full runtime model
solely to verify the implementation; apply the approval and fallback rule in
## When To Use.
A valid RED test:
If the test passes immediately, it is not RED. Change the test or choose a behavior that is not already covered.
If the test errors before reaching the behavior, fix the test setup and rerun until it fails for the expected reason.
GREEN means:
If another check fails, fix it before moving on.
After GREEN, limit refactoring to the existing behavior and scope: remove duplication, improve names, extract helpers, and align with nearby patterns. Do not add behavior, scope, unrelated cleanup, or speculative abstraction. Then rerun the relevant GREEN check.
For a bug fix, first write a test that reproduces the bug.
The RED evidence must show the original symptom or a minimal equivalent. A fix without a reproduction test is not TDD unless the user explicitly approves the exception.
For behavior-preserving refactors, first add or identify characterization tests that lock the existing behavior.
Run those tests before refactoring, then rerun them after each meaningful refactor step.
When this skill is used from a session-scoped workflow (ralph, ultrawork, or
systematic-debugging operating in a session), record TDD evidence in:
.oh-no/sessions/{sessionId}/verification.md
When invoked top-level with no session (an explicit user TDD request), record the same RED/GREEN/REFACTOR evidence inline in the final report or completion claim instead.
Record:
None — this is an internal mid-loop discipline. Return control to the caller skill (ralph, systematic-debugging, or ultrawork) once the cycle is complete or an exception is recorded. Do not continue as a substitute for ralph.
This compact main-session source is the hook-disabled native-skill fallback for caller-owned child packets. When SessionStart is enabled, its compatible global floor remains the normal direct-dispatch owner.
The main caller sends each child a proportional self-contained English packet with purpose/outcome; target role; exact target/revision and result/revision binding for repository mutation, review, or verification; scope/permissions/non-goals; contract/acceptance; expected evidence/output; and stop/escalation. Keep simple read-only packets proportional. Workflow-specific IDs and deltas come from the selected skill; role prompts do not reconstruct omitted caller context.
For initial independent review, verification, or debugging, withhold maker conclusions, expected verdicts, sibling outputs, and preferred root-cause hypotheses. Disclose them only later when needed for audit or clarification.
This compact platform section is embedded in generated Codex-facing skill documents.
Codex-facing public skills live under skills/. Generated
skills/<skill>/SKILL.md files compose the matching skill core, this compact
runtime section, and any Codex skill-specific overlay such as
docs/platforms/codex-<skill>.md.
Ask approval, preference, scope, or next-step questions directly in the Codex conversation. Keep prompts outcome-first: state the desired outcome, acceptance criteria, non-goals or side effects, expected evidence, and output shape before detailed steps.
Use compact final answers unless the active skill requires a plan, review, or verification report. Preserve durable state in written artifacts before long work, compaction, or handoff.
Dispatch only after the active skill's trigger fires, then read
docs/platforms/codex.md ## Role Dispatch for the full host contract. Use
spawn_agent(task_name="ralplan_planner_draft_01", agent_type="oh-no-planner", message=<self-contained packet>, fork_turns="none") first; the legacy spawn_agent(agent_type="oh-no-planner", ...) shorthand is incomplete
(omitting fork_turns="none" defaults to a full-history fork, which rejects a custom
agent_type), do not combine it with fork_context=true, and use generic
prompt embedding only after the custom agent is actually rejected. The example encodes the Ralplan workflow, Planner role, draft phase, and stable ordinal; derive each caller's concrete identity the same way and keep sibling names unique. The task packet carries scope, ownership, expected
output, and lifecycle; task names match ^[a-z0-9_]+$, use deterministic workflow/role/phase-or-lens/stable-ordinal sibling uniqueness, and never replace requested agent_type plus child agent_role and matching developer instructions as role proof.
Every dispatched result is a dependency: wait_agent must reach final status,
the caller captures and uses the output, and only then performs lifecycle
cleanup. Timeout, empty output, or "No agents completed yet" is not final; do
not close, redo inline, or use missing output as evidence.
After confirmed custom-agent unavailability, embed
docs/agent-core/<role>.md; see the full platform doc for the fallback shape.
This channel is trigger-loaded, not embedded in every workflow decision. When a
named THOROUGH paired-review or Fusion Rescue trigger fires, read and apply
docs/platforms/codex.md ## Cross-Host Consult Channel before dispatch. Until
then, do not preload opposite-host invocation details.