Local-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's
in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full
context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user
find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what
each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first,
review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any
external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as
slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at
~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at
~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at
~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls.
Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to
find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier,
or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR
status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue
for Y", "refre
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Local-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's
in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full
context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user
find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what
each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first,
review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any
external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as
slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at
~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at
~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at
~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls.
Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to
find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier,
or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR
status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue
for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
Local-only OSS contribution workflow. The skill itself is the system — there is no separate CLI binary, dashboard, or cloud backend. State lives in three places:
GitHub itself — fetched live via gh for any PR/issue state question. Never cached long-term.
Markdown candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/<owner>__<repo>__issue<N>.md — one per issue we're tracking. Frontmatter is the queryable layer (status, scout_score, repo, research_path, overrides). Body holds claim drafts, PR drafts, scope notes.
Markdown repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/<owner>__<repo>.md — one per upstream repo we contribute to. Built by the @researcher subagent. Frontmatter is canonical for every gate (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates). Body holds curated knowledge: pet peeves, failure log, free-form notes that survive refresh.
Append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl — every gate run, transition attempt, override, scout/researcher invocation lands here with a UTC timestamp. Filterable via jq.
Use this skill when the user wants to:
Know what's in flight (open PRs, claimed issues, candidate queue)
Find a new issue to contribute to on GitHub
Build or refresh a per-repo dossier (delegates to @researcher)
Run gate-checked transitions (claim, work, submit) — every external action passes through transition.sh first
Draft a claim comment, Design Issue, or PR description (default: Design Issue, NOT a PR)
Run an upstream repo's test suite
The pre-2026-04-30 version of the skill used a SQLite tracker (~/.contribute-system/contribute.db, 32 tables) plus a separate contribute-system/ monorepo (Next.js dashboard, TS CLI, Cloud Functions). Both were deleted because they were never used in practice. The skill now reads markdown directly. That tradeoff is deliberate: human-readable, greppable, git-trackable, survives any tool, no daemon process.
Prerequisites
gh CLI, authenticated as the user (gh auth status should show "Logged in")
jq on PATH (used by gates + log filtering)
Workspace at ~/000-projects/contributing-clanker/ containing upstream clones (each clone has its own for project conventions)
CLAUDE.md
Runtime state dir at ~/.contribute-system/ — created on first scout/researcher run if missing
Run this DCI check at activation (output is auto-injected into the prompt):
Before answering anything contribution-related, surface current state. Run these in parallel with the Bash tool:
# Upstream PRs in flight (filtered to outside-org repos only —# the system tracks contributions INTO repos the user does not own;# own-repo PRs are out of scope and must be excluded).## OWN_ORGS is the prefix list of repos to exclude. Update if the user# adds a new org. (Discoverable via `gh api user/orgs --jq '.[].login'`# plus the user's own login from `gh api user --jq '.login'`.)
OWN_ORGS='jeremylongshore/ intent-solutions-io/'
gh search prs --author=@me --state=open --limit=50 \
--json number,title,url,repository,isDraft,createdAt | \
jq --arg own "$OWN_ORGS"'
($own | split(" ")) as $excl |
map(select(.repository.nameWithOwner as $r |
($excl | map(. as $p | $r | startswith($p)) | any) | not))
'# Recently-merged + closed upstream PRs (last 30, same scope filter)
gh search prs --author=@me --state=closed --limit=30 \
--json number,title,url,repository,closedAt,createdAt | \
jq --arg own "$OWN_ORGS"'
($own | split(" ")) as $excl |
map(select(.repository.nameWithOwner as $r |
($excl | map(. as $p | $r | startswith($p)) | any) | not))
'# Local candidate tracker — markdown frontmatter is the queryable layer.# Candidates are upstream-only by construction (scout never enqueues# own-repo issues), so no scope filter needed here.for f in ~/.contribute-system/candidates/*.md; do
awk -v f="$(basename "$f" .md)"'
/^---$/ { fm = !fm ? 1 : 2; next }
fm == 1 && /^(repo|issue_number|status|scout_score|research_path|pr_number):/ { print f, $0 }
'"$f"done 2>/dev/null
# Recent activity from the event logtail -50 ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl 2>/dev/null \
| jq -c "select(.event | test(\"transition_|gate_|researcher_|scout_\"))" 2>/dev/null
Scope rule (non-negotiable): this skill applies only to contributions made INTO repos the user does not own. Own-org PRs (jeremylongshore/*, intent-solutions-io/*) are out of scope — they are personal-project work, not anti-slop OSS contributions. The whole architecture (gates, dossiers, lifecycle) exists because upstream maintainers need protection from low-quality AI work; that concern doesn't apply to the user's own repos. If a candidate file ever references an own-org repo, it's a scout bug — flag it.
Then summarize for the user:
N open / draft PRs (and any blocked on review)
N candidates in claimed or working status but not yet submitted
N candidates in open / shortlist status (sorted by scout_score desc)
Any contradictions between gh (PR state) and the candidate's status: field (e.g., PR merged but candidate still says submitted) — flag for cleanup
N candidates whose research_path: is empty or stale (>14d) — flag for @researcher build/refresh
Skip Step 0 only when the user asks about something unrelated to their own contributions.
Step 0.5 — Ensure dossier exists for any repo we'll touch
Every repo we contribute to needs a dossier at
~/.contribute-system/research/<owner>__<repo>.md — that's where every gate
in ~/.contribute-system/gates/ reads its rules from (branch convention,
CLA/DCO, AI policy, draft-first preference, review bots, etc.).
Before any lifecycle transition (claim, work, submit) for a candidate at
repo <owner>/<repo>:
DOSSIER=~/.contribute-system/research/$(echo <owner>/<repo> | tr'/''_').md
DOSSIER=${DOSSIER/__/__}# ensure double underscoreif [[ ! -f "$DOSSIER" ]]; thenecho"no dossier — invoking @researcher"# delegate to the researcher subagentfi# Also check staleness — refresh if >14 days old
LAST=$(awk '/^last_refreshed:/{print $2; exit}'"$DOSSIER")
if [[ -n "$LAST" ]]; then
AGE_DAYS=$(( ( $(date +%s) - $(date -d "$LAST" +%s) ) / 86400 ))
[[ "$AGE_DAYS" -gt 14 ]] && echo"stale ($AGE_DAYS d) — invoking @researcher refresh"fi
Delegate dossier build/refresh to the @researcher subagent (defined
at ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/agents/researcher.md). It runs in its own context window so
the verbose CONTRIBUTING.md fetch + depth-1 link follows stay out of your
main conversation. It writes the dossier to disk and reports back a
one-paragraph summary.
If the user already invoked @researcher earlier in the session for this
repo, skip — don't re-build.
Step 1 — Discover
Find issues worth contributing to. Sources, in priority order:
Existing candidates with status: open or status: shortlist already in ~/.contribute-system/candidates/ — already discovered + vetted, ranked by scout_score: frontmatter field
Fresh GitHub label searches scoped to repos / languages in ~/.contribute-system/profile.md: gh search issues "label:'good first issue' state:open language:<lang>" --limit 50
Delegate discovery to the @scout subagent (defined at ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/agents/scout.md). It runs in its own context window so the verbose gh search output stays out of your main conversation. Pass it a mode: baseline (full per-tier sweep), refresh (re-evaluate existing candidates for momentum), or an ad-hoc query like "TypeScript repos at mainstream tier with no competing PRs." Scout writes ranked candidate markdown files to ~/.contribute-system/candidates/ and appends events to ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. Summarize the top picks for the user from those files; do not re-run the search yourself.
Step 2 — Qualify
Before claiming any issue, run these in parallel against the target repo:
gh pr list --repo <owner>/<repo> --search "<issue#>" --state=all
gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/commits --jq '.[0:3] | map({date: .commit.author.date, msg: .commit.message[0:60]})'
gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/contents/CONTRIBUTING.md --jq '.content' | base64 -d 2>/dev/null
Quick-reject signals:
2+ active PRs already on the issue
Issue >90 days old with maintainer silence
CLA required for trivial work
Stack mismatch with the user's strengths
Use the bundled agents/repo-analyzer.md for the structured eligibility / CLA / rules check.
Step 3 — Claim
Draft a claim comment from assets/claim-template.md. Adapt to the upstream's tone (lowercase if they use lowercase). Show the draft to the user for approval. Never gh issue comment autonomously.
Gate-checked transitions — before showing the claim draft to the user,
run the gate-runner via transition.sh to catch traps (already-assigned,
already-shipped, stale labels, AI-policy strikes, etc.):
If gates BLOCK, surface the blockers + fix hints to the user. They can fix
the underlying issue, pick a different candidate, or use
--override-gate <ID> "reason" if they have a specific justification (the
reason is logged to ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl).
After the user posts the claim and gates pass, the candidate's status:
field is bumped automatically by transition.sh (atomic write). No manual
SQLite update needed — the markdown candidate file IS the tracker.
Step 4 — Work
Each clone in ~/000-projects/contributing-clanker/ has its own CLAUDE.md. Read it first. Run the project's native test suite — common patterns:
This runs phase B (pre-PR), C (PR submission), E (identity), F (legal),
and G (infrastructure) gates against the local diff + dossier rules. BLOCK
gates refuse the transition; WARN gates surface in the briefing for the
user to acknowledge before proceeding.
After successful submission, transition.sh bumps the candidate's
status: to submitted atomically. Manually add the PR number to the
candidate's frontmatter:
# After PR is opened
sed -i "s/^pr_number:.*/pr_number: <num>/; s|^pr_url:.*|pr_url: <url>|" \
~/.contribute-system/candidates/<owner>__<repo>__issue<N>.md
Reconciliation
Periodically (or on user request "reconcile candidates"), check candidates with a pr_number: field against live GitHub state:
for f in ~/.contribute-system/candidates/*.md; do
PR=$(awk '/^pr_number:/{print $2; exit}'"$f")
REPO=$(awk '/^repo:/{print $2; exit}'"$f")
[[ -z "$PR" || "$PR" == "null" ]] && continue
gh pr view "$PR" --repo "$REPO" --json state,merged,closedAt
done
For each candidate whose actual PR state has moved on:
PR merged → set status: merged in the candidate (atomic write)
PR closed unmerged → set status: dropped and append a row to the dossier's ## Failure log section so we learn from it
PR still open → no change (status: submitted)
Mandatory: human approval before external submission
Copied verbatim from the repo's CLAUDE.md:
Before submitting ANYTHING to external repos:
Run all tests — ALL must pass
Run project-specific linters — no errors
ASK JEREMY FOR APPROVAL with test summary, file list, proposed body
Default to Design Issue, NOT a PR
NEVER auto-submit PRs. NEVER bypass human approval. Design issues > PRs.
Output
After Step 0, output a status block. After each subsequent step, output structured progress.
State summary (after Step 0)
PRs in flight: <N> open, <M> draft
- <repo>#<num>: <title> (state, age)
...
Claimed but not submitted: <N>
- <id>: <repo>#<issue> ($value)
...
Tracked opportunities: <N> (top 5 by value)
- <id>: <repo>#<issue> ($value, <competition flag>)
...
Drift: <N> rows where tracker disagrees with GitHub
- <id>: tracker says <X>, gh says <Y> — suggest <Z>
Per-step output
Step
Output
Discover
Three sections: Tracker queue / Fresh GitHub / Algora URLs. Top 3 picks highlighted.
Qualify
Verdict block: claim / wait / skip with one-sentence reason
Claim
Markdown draft of the comment, with placeholders filled. Awaits user approval.
Work
Test summary: pass/fail counts, duration, coverage %, log path
Submit
Markdown draft of the PR or Design Issue body. Awaits user approval.
Audit subcommands
When the user asks "what gates am I overriding most?" or "audit my contribution
history" or "show me override frequency":
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/audit-overrides.sh # all-time${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/audit-overrides.sh --since=30 # last 30 days${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/audit-overrides.sh --scope=org:posthog # one org${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/audit-overrides.sh --gate=A05 # one gate${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/audit-overrides.sh --json # JSON
Output is a per-gate table with [overrides, blocks, override_rate, top_reason],
sorted by override_rate desc. Gates overridden ≥50% of the time get flagged for
investigation — either the gate is too strict (false-positive heavy) or it's
catching real risk that's being consistently dismissed. Either way, surface it.
Wait 60s and retry; check gh auth status token scopes
Candidate's status: submitted but PR is merged
Reconciliation drift
Run reconciliation step (above)
User asks to claim, but competing PR exists
Risk
Surface the competing PR explicitly; gate A2 already-shipped will BLOCK if it's a merged dupe
Test suite hangs (e.g., posthog without flox)
Wrong env
Wrap in flox activate -- bash -c "..." for flox-managed repos
gh issue comment permission denied
Repo private or token missing scope
Show the comment text to the user; they post manually
Gate run BLOCKs unexpectedly
Stale dossier or wrong rule
@researcher refresh <owner>/<repo>; if the rule itself is wrong, edit the dossier (manual sections survive refresh) or override with transition.sh ... --override-gate <ID> "reason"
Dossier missing for a candidate's repo
First time touching this repo
@researcher build <owner>/<repo> (auto-invoked by Step 0.5 anyway)
If any external submission would happen without human approval, stop and ask. This is non-negotiable.
Examples
Example 1: "What's my PR status?"
User invokes /contribute or asks "what's in flight?"
Run Step 0 (parallel gh pr list + gh issue list + candidate-frontmatter scan + recent log events)
Output the State Summary block
Stop. The user can drill into any PR with a follow-up question.
Example 2: "Find me a new contribution to work on"
User asks "what should I work on next?" or "scout opportunities."
Run Step 0 first (state summary)
Delegate to @scout (the user-scope subagent at ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/agents/scout.md)
Optional: per top pick, run Step 2 (Qualify) to surface CLA / competing-PR signals
Example 3: "Draft a claim for screenpipe#1234"
User asks to claim a specific issue.
Run Step 2 (Qualify) on mediar-ai/screenpipe#1234
If verdict is claim, read assets/claim-template.md
Fill placeholders (approach in 1-2 bullets, ETA, CLA status)
Show draft to user
On user approval, post via gh issue comment AND update tracker (Step 3 SQL)
Example 4: "Reconcile the tracker"
User asks to sync local state with GitHub.
Read all tracker rows where pr_number IS NOT NULL
For each, run gh pr view <repo> <pr_number> --json state,merged
Update tracker rows whose status disagrees with GitHub state
Output a diff summary: N rows updated, M unchanged
Example 5: "Run tests on cortex"
User asks to verify a working branch.
Read agents/test-runner.md
Detect cortex stack (Python + pyproject.toml)
cd ~/000-projects/contributing-clanker/cortex && pytest -v 2>&1 | tee ~/.contribute-system/test-logs/$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)-cortex.log
Output test summary block (pass/fail counts, log path)
Resources
Bundled subagents (load with Read agents/<name>.md)
@scout (user-scope subagent at ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/agents/scout.md) — discovery sweep, GitHub-only, ranked by star-tier brackets. Each candidate it writes carries a research_path: frontmatter field pointing at the matching dossier (or empty if not yet built).
@researcher (user-scope subagent at ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/agents/researcher.md) — build / refresh the per-repo dossier at ~/.contribute-system/research/<owner>__<repo>.md. Auto-invoked when a candidate's dossier is missing or older than 14 days.
agents/repo-analyzer.md — DEPRECATED. Most of its function is now in the dossier system. Keep until Slice 3 retires it.
agents/draft-writer.md — draft a Design Issue or PR body from a working branch's diff
agents/test-runner.md — detect upstream stack and run the native test suite, log to disk
The repo's own CLAUDE.md at ~/000-projects/contributing-clanker/CLAUDE.md for project conventions and per-clone build commands
Old patterns (deprecated, do not reintroduce)
The pre-2026-04-30 skill referenced a contribute CLI binary, EV scoring, judge gates, slack notifications, asciinema work-session recording, evidence bundles, and competition risk scoring. The underlying contribute-system/ monorepo was deleted because it was never used.
The pre-2026-05-03 skill used a SQLite tracker at ~/.contribute-system/contribute.db (32 tables, bounties-keyed schema) plus an Algora/Gumroad/Cortex bounty-board framing. That DB was wiped; the framing is gone. The system is now markdown-only: candidate files + dossiers + JSONL event log. The skill is a contribution tool — not a tracker, not a payouts system, not a portfolio.
If a feature from those eras is wanted back, recover code from git log in ~/000-projects/contributing-clanker/. The bar to re-add is "Jeremy actually uses it daily."
