Interprets, summarizes, and visualizes student assessment data from any common K-12 assessment tool — DIBELS, iReady, STAR, NWEA MAP, state assessments, progress monitoring probes, benchmark screeners, or teacher-created assessments. Trigger this skill whenever the user pastes or uploads student data, wants to make sense of assessment results, needs to present data to parents or staff, wants to identify students for intervention, asks what the data means, wants a data summary for an IEP or team meeting, needs to track progress over time, or asks about data trends. Also trigger when the user says "help me understand this data", "what does this tell me?", "who needs intervention?", or "how do I explain this to parents?" Works with pasted tables, uploaded .xlsx or .csv files, or verbal descriptions of data. Always applies FERPA anonymization before producing outputs unless user confirms safe context.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Interprets, summarizes, and visualizes student assessment data from any common K-12 assessment tool — DIBELS, iReady, STAR, NWEA MAP, state assessments, progress monitoring probes, benchmark screeners, or teacher-created assessments. Trigger this skill whenever the user pastes or uploads student data, wants to make sense of assessment results, needs to present data to parents or staff, wants to identify students for intervention, asks what the data means, wants a data summary for an IEP or team meeting, needs to track progress over time, or asks about data trends. Also trigger when the user says "help me understand this data", "what does this tell me?", "who needs intervention?", or "how do I explain this to parents?" Works with pasted tables, uploaded .xlsx or .csv files, or verbal descriptions of data. Always applies FERPA anonymization before producing outputs unless user confirms safe context.
Student Data Dashboard
Purpose
Transform raw student assessment data into clear, actionable insights that
drive instructional decisions — without requiring the educator to be a data
analyst. Every output should answer the only question that ultimately matters:
What does this tell me about what students need next?
Data philosophy: Data is a means, not an end. Assessment data is a proxy
for student understanding — useful when it informs instruction, harmful when
it becomes the primary lens through which students are seen.
What You Need From the User
Gather before generating. Ask for anything missing:
The data (required): Pasted table, uploaded file, or verbal description
Time point: Beginning-of-year / Mid-year / End-of-year / Progress monitoring
Purpose of this analysis: Class-level instruction planning / Individual
student IEP data / Team meeting presentation / Parent communication /
Identifying intervention students?
Data Interpretation Workflow
Step 1 — Intake and Audit
Before interpreting, check data integrity:
Are there missing data points? Flag them explicitly.
Are column headers clear? If not, ask for clarification.
Are all students/rows de-identified? If names are present, apply
anonymization before proceeding (or prompt user to do so).
What is the assessment's unit of measure? (percentile, scaled score,
lexile, grade equivalent, raw score, benchmark category)
Step 2 — Score Translation
Translate raw scores into educator-meaningful language:
Measure Type
Translation Approach
Percentile rank
"This score is higher than X% of students nationally at this time of year"
Benchmark category
Use the tool's category language (Well Below / Below / At / Above) + what it means for instruction
Scaled score / RIT
Compare to normative growth expectation for this time of year
Grade equivalent
Use with caution — note limitations (GE of 5.2 does not mean student reads like a 5th grader)
Lexile
Connect to text complexity ranges for grade level
Common assessment reference norms — See references/assessment-norms.md
for benchmark cut scores, national norms, and growth targets for DIBELS,
NWEA MAP, iReady, and STAR.
Step 3 — Class-Level Summary
For class or group data, generate:
Distribution Summary
CLASS DATA SUMMARY — [Assessment] | [Grade] | [Date]
Total students assessed: [N]
Performance Distribution:
Well Below Benchmark: [N] ([%]) ← Priority for Tier 2/3 intervention
Below Benchmark: [N] ([%]) ← Monitor; some may need Tier 2
At Benchmark: [N] ([%]) ← Core instruction meeting needs
Above Benchmark: [N] ([%]) ← Consider enrichment/extension
Class median: [score] | National 50th percentile: [score]
Class average: [score]
Instructional Grouping Suggestion
Based on the distribution, suggest flexible instructional grouping:
Which students need intensive (Tier 3) support?
Which students need supplemental (Tier 2) support?
Which students are ready for enrichment?
What skill areas are most common across struggling students?
Class-Level Instructional Implications
What does this data collectively suggest about the core instructional program?
If >20% of students are below benchmark: consider core program review
If a specific subgroup shows consistent gap: name it and suggest targeted response
If high variance: differentiation and flexible grouping are the priority
Step 4 — Individual Student Profile
For individual or small group data:
STUDENT PROFILE — [Pseudonym] | [Grade] | [Date]
Assessment: [Name]
Score: [X] | Benchmark Category: [Category]
Compared to grade-level benchmark: [X points above/below]
Compared to last assessment: [+/- X] ([growth / concern / stable])
SKILL AREA BREAKDOWN:
[Subtest 1]: [Score] — [At/Below/Above] expected range
[Subtest 2]: [Score] — [At/Below/Above] expected range
[etc.]
INSTRUCTIONAL PRIORITY:
Primary need: [skill area]
Recommended focus: [specific skill target]
Suggested next step: [brief instructional recommendation]
Step 5 — Progress Monitoring Trend Analysis
For repeated-measure data (progress monitoring over time):
Calculate growth rate (score per week or per month)
Compare to expected growth rate for the intervention goal
Generate a brief trend statement:
Adequate Progress: "Student's growth rate ([X] points/week) meets
the target of [Y] points/week. Continue current intervention."
Insufficient Progress: "Student's growth rate ([X] points/week)
falls below the target of [Y] points/week. Consider adjusting
intervention intensity, duration, or approach."
Plateau: "Student's scores have been stable for [X] weeks without
growth. This warrants a team review and possible program change."
If the user has chart/graph data or wants visualization, generate an
ASCII trend chart or export-ready data table:
Plain-language summary (no jargon). See references/parent-data-language.md
for tested parent-friendly framing.
Template:
"[Student pseudonym]'s recent reading assessment tells us [plain-language
summary of performance]. Compared to what we expect at this point in the
year, [student] is [at / working toward / exceeding] the goal. Here is
what we are doing to support [him/her/them], and here is what you can do
at home."
For Team/IEP Meeting
Brief data summary table + one paragraph of interpretive narrative. Format
the narrative around three questions: What does the data show? What does
it mean? What are we going to do about it?
For Administrative / Board Presentation
Anonymized class or grade-level aggregate only. Highlight trends, growth
rates, and action plans. Avoid individual student data in any non-IEP
administrative presentation.
Assessment Literacy Notes
Include these clarifications when the context suggests the user may benefit:
On percentile ranks: A percentile rank of 40 does not mean a student
got 40% correct. It means the student performed higher than 40% of the
normative sample. Percentile ranks do not move on an equal-interval scale —
a 10-point gain at the 50th percentile is different from a 10-point gain
at the 5th percentile.
On grade equivalents: A 3rd grader with a grade equivalent of 5.2 does
not read like a 5th grader. GE scores mean the student scored as well as
the average 5th grader, month 2, would score on a 3rd grade test. GE
scores should not be used to place students in grade-level texts.
On growth scores: Growth without context is misleading. A student who
grew 8 points may be making excellent progress or inadequate progress
depending on the expected growth for that starting point and time of year.
Always compare growth to a benchmark growth target.
Reference Files
references/assessment-norms.md — Benchmark cut scores, national norms,
and growth targets for DIBELS 8th Ed, NWEA MAP, iReady, STAR, and common
state assessments
references/parent-data-language.md — Tested plain-language templates
for communicating assessment data to families
