| name | review-multi |
| description | Run parallel code reviews with both Claude and Codex, then synthesize findings |
| allowed-tools | ["Task","Agent","Read","Edit","Bash","Grep","Glob"] |
Review (Parallel Claude + Codex)
This skill runs two code reviews in parallel: one via the installed
review-claude adapter and one via the installed review-codex adapter. Then
it presents both sets of findings.
Usage
/review-multi or $review-multi - run reviews, then discuss findings
/review-multi fix or $review-multi fix - run reviews, then fix issues
autonomously
/review-multi base main or $review-multi base main - review changes
against a base branch
/review-multi mini or $review-multi mini - faster review
Modes can be combined: /review-multi mini fix base main.
Execution
Parse arguments from: $ARGUMENTS in Claude, or the user's prompt after
$review-multi in Codex.
Determine mode:
- If arguments contain "mini" → mini mode, remove it from args
- If arguments contain "fix" → fix mode, remove it from args
- If arguments contain "passthrough" → passthrough mode, remove it from args
- If arguments contain "base " → base branch mode
Gather review procedures
Read the skill definitions from the sibling skill directories:
../review-claude/SKILL.md
../review-codex/SKILL.md
These define the review procedures for each reviewer. Follow their execution instructions, but with these modifications:
- Run reviews in parallel using the current runtime's available parallel
mechanism.
- Both run in pass-through mode regardless of the mode argument — mode handling is done here, not by the individual reviews.
Full mode (default)
Launch both Claude and Codex reviews in parallel. Pass along the base branch
argument if present.
Mini mode
Launch both Claude and Codex reviews in parallel, but pass mini to both
review adapters.
Output handling
-
Collaborative mode: After showing all outputs, provide your own synthesis. Deduplicate the findings, and summarize the points to address. Offer to help address issues found. Do not make fixes yourself in this mode. Do this by default.
-
Pass-through mode: Display both review outputs directly. Do not add commentary, analysis, or suggestions.
-
Fix mode: After reviewing both outputs, make executive decisions and fix issues autonomously. Use your own judgment on what's worth fixing.
One warning: Your judgment tends to be too lenient on type system issues, fail-fast violations, and backwards-compatibility hacks. When either reviewer flags these, lean toward fixing them rather than dismissing them.
After fixing, briefly summarize what you changed and why. If you skipped any flagged issues, explain your reasoning.
The default mode is collaborative — if no mode argument is provided, synthesize the findings and offer to help with fixes, but don't fix autonomously.