analyze

name	analyze
description	Use when deep investigation is needed — project structure, requirement gaps, or root cause diagnosis. Supports --delegate.
argument-hint	[--delegate] [investigation target or question]

Deep Analysis & Investigation

You are the Analyze orchestrator. Agent protocols provide the investigation methodology — you execute them and record output. Never generate findings without an agent protocol. | Argument | Mode | |----------|------| | `` | Self-execute on current host (default) | | `--delegate` | Delegate to the other host (Codex when current is Claude, Claude when current is Codex; current host comes from SessionStart `Current host:`) | | `--delegate ` | Same with prompt |

Strip the --delegate flag before passing the prompt to the execution path. </Argument_Routing>

Phase 1 — Create Analysis File

Write CORAL_PROJECT/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{topic}.md with header:

# Analysis: {topic}
Date: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Question: {user's original request}

• Topic: 2-4 word kebab-case (e.g., auth-flow-gaps, ci-pipeline-root-cause)
• Collision: same date + topic → append -2, -3

Phase 2 — Investigation Steps

For each step in the table below, in order:

1. Evaluate — check "Needed when" against the user's request AND prior findings. Skip if unneeded.
2. Scope — determine target files/modules. Never run unscoped. If a step discovers new facets, carry them into subsequent step evaluation.
3. Execute — run via active mode (see Mode below).
4. Post-process — apply quality gates:
   • Verify CRITICAL/HIGH file:line references (Read cited location, drop incorrect)
   • Drop speculative findings without code evidence. Findings about unchanged code: downgrade and move to ### Peripheral Findings
   • Tag provenance (code trace / test behavior / git history / inference / assumption). Assumption-only → downgrade one level
   • Record finding flow: "N initial → M after gates → K verified [code: X, inference: Y, assumption: Z]"
5. Append — write under the step's output section heading.

Wait for each step's result before evaluating the next. At least one step must run.

Mode

Self-execute (default): Spawn Agent({ subagent_type: "coral:<agent>", prompt: "--deep " + prompt }). Wait for the agent to return its findings. You (the executor) post-process and append the result to the file after each step completes.

Delegate (--delegate): run coral-cli <other-host> <role_name> -i "<--deep prompt>" --work-dir "<work_dir>" -d where <other-host> is the non-current host (Codex if current is Claude; Claude if current is Codex) with scope, work_dir, and analysis file content so far. Run one step at a time — do NOT launch steps in parallel. Each step's output informs the next step's scope and "Needed when" evaluation. Each step is a fresh call (no session continuity — each agent has a different role). After each launch: capture job from Job <job> <launchState> (session <session>), then run coral-cli wait jobs <job> --embed → the terminal output always includes Result path: <path>; read that path for the full artifact and treat inline preview text as optional convenience. On error, abort the chain and report the error. You (the executor) post-process and append the result to the file after each step completes.

Steps

Step	Agent file	Needed when	Output section
1 — Project Scan	coral:scanner	Project structure, architecture, dependencies, or systemic process issues are relevant	## Scan Report
2 — Gap Analysis	coral:gap-finder	Requirement gaps, acceptance criteria, API contracts, or scope risks — from the user's request OR gaps discovered in Step 1	## Gap Analysis
3 — Root Cause Diagnosis	coral:debugger	Bugs, errors, crashes, or unexpected behavior — from the user's request OR symptoms surfaced in prior steps	## Root Cause Diagnosis

Phase 3 — Synthesis Review

Always runs. Read the full analysis file, then:

1. Finding flow summary — counts per step: initial → filtered → verified
2. Thematic grouping (≥2 steps) — group related findings across steps into 2-4 themes. Do NOT restate findings step-by-step. Single step: skip grouping.
3. Unanswered aspects — parts of the user's question no step addressed
4. Cross-step consistency (≥2 steps) — contradictions or reinforcements

Synthesis is meta-verification of existing findings — do NOT re-run agent investigation. If issues found: investigate directly, append under ## Synthesis Review. If clean: append only the finding flow summary.

Phase 4 — Present

Show the saved file path, then summarize key findings inline. <Error_Policy> If an agent file cannot be read, report the error to the user. Do not fall back to inline analysis. </Error_Policy>