superlore-canvas

name	superlore-canvas
description	Author rich, well-structured superlore Canvas diagrams — the `superlore-canvas` block in MDX that renders as a FigJam-grade interactive whiteboard AND a typed knowledge graph. Use whenever creating or editing a visual, diagram, whiteboard, board, architecture map, flow, mind-map, or brainstorm in a superlore knowledge base, or when asked to "visualize", "draw", "diagram", "map out", or "whiteboard" a concept.
metadata	{"author":"superlore","version":"1.0.0"}

Authoring superlore Canvas

A superlore Canvas is a whiteboard you write as data. You drop a fenced ```superlore-canvas block (a JSON object) into any .mdx file and it renders as a polished, interactive board — and the same JSON is the knowledge graph the MCP serves. So you are never drawing a picture an agent has to interpret; you are authoring { nodes, edges, groups } that is simultaneously the human view and the machine view. Author semantics, not pixels — colours, sizes and layout are auto-designed.

This is the move that extends FigJam: a FigJam board is pixels; a superlore Canvas is a typed graph (nodes, typed relations, sections) that happens to render beautifully. Lean into the structure.

The golden workflow — think before you draw

Do not start emitting nodes. Plan first, in this order:

1. What is the one thing this board must communicate? A system's shape? A decision? A flow? A brainstorm? The answer picks the layout and the story.
2. What are the sections? Almost every good board is organized into 2–6 sections (frames). Name them as the beats of the story (e.g. Ingress → Services → Data, or Symptoms → Hypotheses → Decision → Rollout). Sections are first-class — use them.
3. What goes in each section, and what kind is each thing? Pick the shape that means the thing (see the vocabulary). A datastore is a cylinder, a decision is a diamond, an idea is a sticky, an aside is an annotation.
4. How do things relate? Draw edges for real relationships and give the important ones a typed rel (depends-on, blocks, links…) — that is what makes the board queryable, not just pretty.
5. What's the register? A precise architecture diagram is clean (sketch off). A brainstorm or an explainer for the team is warmer (sketch: true).

Then write the JSON. Trust auto-layout: do not set x/y unless you genuinely need an exact placement — ELK lays everything out with no overlaps.

The spec (exact)

A board is a JSON object. Only nodes is required.

{
  "title": "Optional board title",
  // "auto" (default, tidy layered) | "flow" | "tree" | "free" (organic scatter)
  // | "board" (a poster of disconnected sections, placed in authored order — see Layouts)
  // | "manual" (FigJam-style absolute placement — honour every x/y/width/height)
  "layout": "auto",
  "direction": "right", // "right" (default) | "down"  — flow direction for auto-layout
  "height": 520, // optional px number or CSS string; otherwise the board hugs its content
  "sketch": false, // true → hand-drawn connectors + handwritten section titles + dotted sections
  "groups": [
    /* sections */
  ],
  "nodes": [
    /* the things */
  ],
  "edges": [
    /* the relationships */
  ],
}

Nodes

{
  "id": "api", // required, unique; referenced by edges + `to`
  "kind": "rounded", // see the vocabulary below (default "rounded")
  "label": "API gateway", // short text on the node
  "body": "line one\nline two", // longer text for `note` cards (\n = line break)
  "intent": "blue", // OPTIONAL colour — omit and auto-design picks a harmonious one
  "icon": "shield", // lucide icon name (kebab-case) — for `icon` kind or a leading glyph
  "src": "https://…/x.png", // image source for kind:"image"
  "hand": false, // true → render this node's text in the handwriting face (text/heading/note/sticky)
  "dashed": false, // true → dashed border (a tentative / proposed / optional box)
  "count": 3, // for kind:"stack" — how many cards read in the pile (2–4)
  "group": "ingress", // section membership (a group id)
  "to": ["svc", "db"], // sugar: outgoing edges to these ids (no labels)
  "x": 40,
  "y": 0,
  "width": 220,
  "height": 80, // OPTIONAL exact placement — overrides auto-layout (required in `manual`)
}

Node kinds — pick the one that carries meaning:

Kind	Use it for
rounded (default), rect, card	a service, component, step, generic box
circle, ellipse	a start/end, an actor, an endpoint
diamond	a decision / branch (the one "this matters" shape)
cylinder	a datastore — DB, cache, queue, bucket
sticky	an idea / note on a brainstorm (a wall of these reads as designed)
note	a titled multi-line note (label + body)
annotation	a handwritten margin aside — a caveat, a "watch this", a question
stack	a pile of cards — "many of these": records, stories, a dataset, a backlog (count)
heading	big free display text — a board title/verdict/question (hand → handwritten)
embed	a live superlore component — component + props (Timeline, Comparison, StatGrid, Board, Decision, KeyFacts, EntityCard, Releases, Roster, Schedule); its data rides into the graph
icon	an architecture component with a big glyph (icon: "cloud", "server", "shield"…)
image	an embedded image (src)
pill, text	a tag/label; or bare text (add a body for a multi-line aside paragraph)
process, document, parallelogram, trapezoid, callout	flowchart semantics (process, doc, I/O, manual op, speech bubble)
triangle, triangle-down, pentagon, hexagon, octagon, star, cross, arrow-left, arrow-right, chevron	basic shapes when you need a specific glyph

Intents (colour) — earn them, don't spray them. Omit intent and auto-design gives plain boxes a calm, harmonious hue and stickies a lively rotation, so a board with no colours still looks designed. Set intent to make a point: semantic — accent (the brand violet, for the key thing), success, warning, danger, info, neutral, muted; or a FigJam colour — gray, red, orange, yellow, green, teal, blue, purple, pink. Tip: give each section a colour family and let its cards share it.

Edges

{
  "from": "api",
  "to": "db",
  "label": "writes",
  "kind": "arrow",
  "intent": "blue",
  "rel": "depends-on",
}

• kind: arrow (default) · line (no head) · bidirectional · dashed (fallback/async/best-effort) · curved · sketch (hand-drawn).
• intent (optional colour): tint the connector + its arrowhead — a FigJam/semantic colour to read a flow by colour (e.g. the "happy path" in teal), or neutral for a strong foreground line. Omit for the calm default. Earn it like node colour; don't make a rainbow of arrows.
• rel (the important one): a typed relationship the knowledge graph keeps — links, depends-on, blocks, parent/child, part-of, owned-by, defines, mentions, supersedes/superseded-by, related, see-also. Use it on edges that carry real meaning; it's what lets an agent answer "what depends on X?" without reading the picture.
• Short edge labels (1–3 words) read best. Or use node to: sugar for unlabeled edges.

Groups (sections) — the backbone of a good board

{
  "id": "data",
  "label": "Data tier",
  "frame": true, // true → a titled section (pill-tab header, clear border); false/omit → a soft tinted region
  "dashed": true, // a dashed section border — a loose / working / proposed grouping
  "intent": "green", // optional; otherwise the section tints to the colour family of its contents
  "parent": "vpc", // nest this section inside another (sections within sections)
  "dotted": true, // a dotted ground inside the section (on by default when the board is `sketch`)
  // "x"/"y"/"width"/"height" — absolute placement/size (honoured in `manual` layout)
}

Put nodes in a section with the node's group field. Sections can nest (parent) — e.g. Cloud account → VPC → Subnet. Prefer frame: true for the main structural sections.

Layouts — not every board is one flow

• auto (default) / flow / tree — a tidy layered diagram from your edges. The everyday choice.
• free — an organic scatter (a wall of stickies). Brainstorms.
• board — a poster of disconnected sections. Each top-level section (and each ungrouped node) is laid out on its own, then the blocks are packed in the order you declare them, wrapping into rows. No edges between sections required. Reach for this when the board is several independent diagrams + notes + headings side by side (a review board, a "today → target" study). You author reading order; the poster falls out. Reorder the spec → the poster re-flows.
• manual — absolute placement. Every node x/y (and a frame's width/height) is honoured verbatim, FigJam-style; nothing moves. A frame with no explicit size hugs its members. Use it only when you need a hand-arranged board pixel-for-pixel; otherwise prefer board/auto so you author semantics, not coordinates.

Embedding a live component (kind: "embed")

A node can be a superlore component — a Comparison, StatGrid, Timeline, Board, Decision, KeyFacts, EntityCard, Releases, Roster, or Schedule — so a whiteboard can hold real, typed data beside the boxes. Give the node "component" (the name) and "props" (its authored data). The node sizes itself to the component, and the component's own knowledge rides into the canvas graph — so the MCP sees the comparison's cells or the timeline's items, not "a box".

{
  "id": "opts",
  "kind": "embed",
  "component": "Comparison",
  "props": { "options": ["A", "B"], "rows": [{ "criterion": "Managed", "cells": [true, false] }] },
}

Sketch mode — for brainstorms & team explainers

Set board-level "sketch": true and the whole board turns hand-drawn: connectors waver like a marker, section titles + edge labels render in a handwriting face, and sections get a dotted ground. It's one flag that turns a clean diagram into a FigJam-style whiteboard. Use it for ideation, explainers, and "let me walk you through this" boards; keep it off for precise reference diagrams. Per-edge "kind": "sketch" and per-group "dotted" still override.

Templates — start from a ready structure (prefer this)

When the ask matches a known framework, don't hand-build the frames — set template and drop your nodes into its named frames. You get the correct, designed structure (icons, colours, layout) for free, and it's reproducible. Add nodes with group: "<frame id>"; rename scaffold nodes by reusing their id.

{ "template": "swot", "nodes": [{ "kind": "sticky", "group": "strengths", "label": "…" }] }

template	Frame / node ids to fill
swot	strengths · weaknesses · opportunities · threats
business-model-canvas	partners activities resources value relationships channels segments costs revenue
lean-canvas	problem solution metrics uvp advantage lc-channels lc-segments lc-costs lc-revenue
2x2 (impact/effort)	quick-wins · big-bets · fill-ins · money-pits
user-journey	awareness · consideration · decision · onboarding · retention
rca	symptoms · hypotheses · cause · fix
system-architecture	frames client/edge/services/data; rename nodes svc-a,svc-b,db,…
okr-tree	rename nodes objective,kr1,kr2,kr3
org-chart	rename nodes ceo,cto,cpo,cro,eng,design,sales
mind-map	rename center,b1…b4 (hand-drawn)

Not a whiteboard? Use the right component instead of Canvas: a sprint/sales/hiring board or retro → <Board>; a RICE / ICE / RACI / decision matrix → <Comparison>; a roadmap → <Timeline>. Same typed knowledge graph, better fit.

Recipes (copy, then adapt)

1 — System architecture (clean, sectioned, typed)

Tiers as frames, the right shape per thing, typed rel on the meaningful edges.

{
  "title": "Checkout — request to settlement",
  "direction": "down",
  "groups": [
    { "id": "edge", "label": "Edge", "frame": true, "intent": "gray" },
    { "id": "svc", "label": "Services", "frame": true, "intent": "blue" },
    { "id": "data", "label": "Data", "frame": true, "intent": "green" }
  ],
  "nodes": [
    { "id": "client", "kind": "circle", "label": "Shopper" },
    { "id": "cdn", "kind": "icon", "icon": "globe", "label": "CDN + WAF", "group": "edge" },
    { "id": "gw", "kind": "icon", "icon": "shield", "label": "API gateway", "group": "edge" },
    { "id": "cart", "kind": "rounded", "label": "Cart service", "group": "svc" },
    { "id": "order", "kind": "rounded", "label": "Order service", "group": "svc" },
    { "id": "pay", "kind": "diamond", "label": "Payment authorized?", "group": "svc" },
    { "id": "db", "kind": "cylinder", "label": "Orders DB", "group": "data" },
    { "id": "cache", "kind": "cylinder", "label": "Redis", "group": "data" }
  ],
  "edges": [
    { "from": "client", "to": "cdn", "label": "HTTPS" },
    { "from": "cdn", "to": "gw" },
    { "from": "gw", "to": "cart", "rel": "links" },
    { "from": "cart", "to": "cache", "label": "read/write", "rel": "depends-on" },
    { "from": "gw", "to": "order", "rel": "links" },
    { "from": "order", "to": "pay" },
    { "from": "pay", "to": "db", "label": "yes", "rel": "depends-on" }
  ]
}

2 — Brainstorm / ideation board (warm, hand-drawn)

sketch: true, sticky notes for ideas, an annotation aside, a decision diamond.

{
  "title": "Cutting checkout p99 latency",
  "sketch": true,
  "direction": "down",
  "groups": [
    { "id": "symptoms", "label": "Symptoms", "frame": true, "intent": "red" },
    { "id": "options", "label": "Options", "frame": true, "intent": "purple" },
    { "id": "decision", "label": "Decision", "frame": true, "intent": "teal" }
  ],
  "nodes": [
    { "id": "slo", "kind": "card", "label": "p99 = 2.4s — SLO breached", "group": "symptoms" },
    { "id": "peak", "kind": "sticky", "label": "Worst at the 8pm sale peak", "group": "symptoms" },
    { "id": "idx", "kind": "sticky", "label": "Add composite index", "group": "options" },
    { "id": "batch", "kind": "sticky", "label": "Batch the line-item reads", "group": "options" },
    { "id": "cache", "kind": "sticky", "label": "Cache hot carts", "group": "options" },
    { "id": "aside", "kind": "annotation", "label": "cache adds invalidation risk — park it", "group": "options" },
    { "id": "pick", "kind": "diamond", "label": "Index + batch first?", "group": "decision" },
    { "id": "ship", "kind": "rounded", "label": "Ship index + batched reads", "group": "decision" }
  ],
  "edges": [
    { "from": "slo", "to": "idx", "label": "dig in" },
    { "from": "idx", "to": "pick" },
    { "from": "batch", "to": "pick" },
    { "from": "pick", "to": "ship", "label": "cheapest win" }
  ]
}

3 — Decision / trade-off flow

Question → options → criteria → outcome; the chosen path stands out.

{
  "title": "Pick a job queue",
  "direction": "down",
  "nodes": [
    { "id": "q", "kind": "diamond", "intent": "accent", "label": "Which queue?" },
    { "id": "a", "kind": "card", "intent": "blue", "label": "Managed (SQS)" },
    { "id": "b", "kind": "card", "intent": "purple", "label": "Self-host (Redis)" },
    { "id": "pick", "kind": "rounded", "intent": "green", "label": "Chosen: SQS" }
  ],
  "edges": [
    { "from": "q", "to": "a" },
    { "from": "q", "to": "b" },
    { "from": "a", "to": "pick", "label": "no ops", "rel": "links" }
  ]
}

4 — A poster of disconnected sections (layout: "board")

Several independent diagrams + notes + a heading on one surface, placed in the order you declare them. No edges between sections. Each section is laid out internally; the blocks wrap into rows.

{
  "title": "Search relevance — where we are",
  "layout": "board",
  "direction": "down",
  "groups": [
    { "id": "today", "label": "Today", "frame": true, "intent": "blue" },
    { "id": "gaps", "label": "Gaps", "frame": true, "dashed": true, "intent": "red" }
  ],
  "nodes": [
    { "id": "q", "kind": "rect", "group": "today", "label": "Query" },
    { "id": "bm25", "kind": "rect", "group": "today", "label": "BM25 ranker" },
    { "id": "store", "kind": "cylinder", "group": "today", "label": "Index" },
    { "id": "docs", "kind": "stack", "group": "today", "label": "Results" },

    { "id": "g1", "kind": "note", "intent": "red", "group": "gaps", "body": "No semantic recall — synonyms miss." },
    { "id": "g2", "kind": "note", "intent": "red", "group": "gaps", "body": "No personalization signal." },

    { "id": "ask", "kind": "heading", "label": "What if ranking were learned?" },
    { "id": "idea", "kind": "note", "intent": "gray", "hand": true, "body": "Add a vector recall stage, then a learned re-ranker over BM25 + embeddings." }
  ],
  "edges": [
    { "from": "q", "to": "bm25", "intent": "blue" },
    { "from": "bm25", "to": "store", "intent": "blue", "label": "lookup" },
    { "from": "store", "to": "docs", "intent": "blue" }
  ]
}

Quality bar (a board is good when…)

• It is organized by sections with clear, story-shaped names.
• Every node's kind carries meaning (decision=diamond, store=cylinder, idea=sticky, aside=annotation, component=icon).
• Colour is earned — sections share a family; the one key thing may use accent; the rest can be auto-coloured (omit intent).
• The important edges carry a typed rel so the graph is queryable.
• It reads as a story in the flow direction; nothing is orphaned.
• Brainstorms/explainers use sketch: true; reference diagrams stay clean.

Common mistakes

• Pixel-pushing. Don't set x/y/width/height unless you truly need an exact layout — let auto-layout work. Reserve explicit coordinates for the rare "place this exactly here" case.
• No sections. A flat soup of boxes reads as noise. Group into 2–6 frames.
• Spraying colour. A rainbow board looks undesigned. Omit intent to let auto-design harmonise, or give each section one family.
• Untyped relationships. Edges with no rel are just lines; add rel to the meaningful ones so the knowledge graph is real.
• Overcrowding. If a board has > ~25 nodes, split the concept across sections or multiple boards.
• Wrong register. A precise architecture diagram in sketch mode looks sloppy; a team explainer in clean mode looks cold. Match the mode to the intent.

Remember

The board is the knowledge graph. A great superlore Canvas is one where an agent calling get_component_data gets clean, typed { nodes, edges, groups } with real rels — and a human gets a board they actually want to read. Author for both at once.