release

name	release
description	Picks up after /build to publish a GitHub release. Pre-flights the staged artifacts, drafts release_notes.md from commits since the last tag, tags master, then hands the gh release create upload command to the user. Stops short of running the upload — that's user-driven.
triggers	["/release","cut release","publish release","release notes"]

Purpose

Picks up where /build ended: an exe + a distribution zip exist under dist-release/, smoke-tested. This skill orchestrates the publish flow — pre-flight checks, release-notes drafting, and tag creation — then hands off to the user to run the actual gh release create upload.

The split: /build produces the artifacts, /release prepares the metadata and ceremony, the user runs the upload command. Keeps every step the user explicitly drives in the user's hands.

Required input

Version (e.g. 0.5.3, v0.5.3, 0.5.3b).

• If the user didn't provide a version, ask for it first. The version must match the /build artifact already on disk — verify by checking that dist-release/JRE-PA-Simulator-v<version>-distribution.zip exists. If the file isn't there, halt and direct user to run /build <version> first.
• Same parsing rules as /build: strip leading v, preserve subversion letter (a/b/c are sub-revisions, not betas).
• Version must match an existing zip — never guess; never invent a "next" version.

Process

Step 1 — Confirm version

If not provided, ask: "What version are we releasing? (must match the zip in dist-release/)". Wait for answer.

Step 2 — Pre-flight checks

Run these as a batch and surface any failures before drafting notes. Halt on first failure — don't proceed to notes when the build state is wrong.

2a. Build artifacts present

$zip = "dist-release\JRE-PA-Simulator-v$VERSION-distribution.zip"
$exe = "dist\JRE-PA-Simulator.exe"
if (-not (Test-Path $zip)) { throw "Missing $zip — run /build $VERSION first." }
if (-not (Test-Path $exe)) { throw "Missing $exe — run /build $VERSION first." }
Get-Item $zip, $exe | Format-Table Name, @{N='Size(MB)';E={[math]::Round($_.Length/1MB,1)}}, LastWriteTime -AutoSize

Sanity-check the zip's LastWriteTime is recent (within the last hour, say). A stale zip from a prior version with the same filename is a real failure mode — if the user re-ran /build mid-session and forgot, you'd ship stale bits.

2b. Embedded version matches

The /build skill writes version_info.txt with the version. Cross-check:

Select-String -Path "version_info.txt" -Pattern "FileVersion.*'$VERSION'" -Quiet

If false → version_info.txt was last written by a different version. Halt; tell user to re-run /build $VERSION.

2c. Branch + clean tree

$branch = git branch --show-current
if ($branch -ne "master") { throw "Releases tag master; current branch is $branch." }
$dirty  = git status --porcelain
if ($dirty) { throw "Working tree is dirty:`n$dirty`nCommit or stash first; release tags a specific SHA." }

2d. Up to date with origin

git fetch origin master
$ahead  = git rev-list --count origin/master..master
$behind = git rev-list --count master..origin/master
if ($behind -gt 0) { throw "Local master is $behind commits behind origin. Pull first." }
# $ahead > 0 is fine — local has unpushed commits the tag will include + push.

2e. Tag doesn't already exist

if (git tag -l "v$VERSION") { throw "Tag v$VERSION already exists. Bump version or delete the tag (`git tag -d`, `git push origin :refs/tags/v$VERSION`)." }

2f. GitHub auth ready

gh auth status 2>&1

If not logged in → halt; tell user to gh auth login.

Step 3 — Survey commits since last release

Find the previous tag and list commits in scope:

$prevTag = (git tag -l "v*" | Sort-Object {[Version]($_ -replace '^v','' -replace '[a-z]$','')} | Select-Object -Last 1)
git log --oneline "$prevTag..master"

Surface this list to the user before drafting — gives them a chance to flag commits they don't want in the notes.

Read the commits CAREFULLY — reconstruct the timeline, don't skim. A large release (50+ commits) is not licence to judge from subjects at a glance. Read the messages (bodies where they matter) to build the shape of the release: which commits are iterations of ONE body of work (many feat(setup) commits = one first-release feature, not many); what is a genuine fix to a PRE-EXISTING shipped feature versus polish on something new this release; and what a later commit superseded. That timeline judgment is what sets correct weighting and categorization — skimming is exactly what produces a one-line blurb for a huge feature and a "Fixes" bucket full of a new feature's internals. Per principles.md § "Verify before claiming" ("deriving release/history facts: read the commit messages in range").

Step 4 — Draft release_notes.md

Filter criterion (copied here verbatim from /build skill so the rule lives where it's applied):

Include a change in user-facing release notes iff the artifact it affects ships inside the distribution zip.

What ships: the exe, fonts/, data/** (excluding data/_*), audio/** (excluding audio/_*/), ocr_templates/. Anything that lands in dist-release/JRE-PA-Simulator/ qualifies.

What does not ship: README*.md (repo-only), CLAUDE.md, .claude/**, .github/**, memory/**, pyproject.toml, test/preview harnesses, the mock route catalog (audio/_mock/**). Changes to these are invisible to end users of the exe → omit.

Mixed commits (one commit touches both shipped and repo-only paths): report only the shipped-facing portion.

Format — match the prior release. Read the previous release's notes via gh release view v<prev> or check past release_notes.md in git history (git log --all -- release_notes.md); the v0.5.2 layout uses ### Program / ### Data sections + a distribution footer.

Structure:

## v<VERSION> Release

### Program

- **<headline feature>.** One-paragraph user-facing description. No internal jargon ("apply per-N text scaling tier", "Rule 4 fallback") — describe what the user sees.

- **<next program change>.** …

### Data

# Group by ROUTE, not by change-type. One bolded route name per bullet,
# its changes after. (Not "Translations: …" / "Audio cleanup: …" across lines.)
- **<Route name>.** What changed for this route (new translations, audio trim, …).

- **<Another route>.** …

---

**Distribution:** `JRE-PA-Simulator-v<VERSION>-distribution.zip` is self-contained — extract and run. The standalone `JRE-PA-Simulator.exe` is also attached for users who already have `fonts/`, `data/`, `audio/`, and `ocr_templates/` folders alongside it.

Each bullet starts with a bolded headline noun followed by . then the description. Terse — 1–3 sentences.

Voice — professional and factual, never editorial (standing user preference). Complete, plain sentences that state what a feature is and does. No marketing register, hype, flourishes, or commit-message fragments. Explain a feature the way you would to a person — contrast old→new only where it clarifies a capability ("you used to press a key for each announcement; now the app plays them automatically"). See user-level ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md § Language and tone.

Image-first. If a feature can be shown, embed a screenshot (committed under assets/, referenced by a tag-pinned raw URL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/<owner>/<repo>/<tag>/assets/<file>) and CUT the prose that narrates what the image shows. Reserve prose for what an image cannot convey: logic/behavioural changes, opt-in requirements, localization.

A first release of a component has no baseline. When a feature ships for the FIRST time (e.g. the TIMS setup interface in v0.6.0), describe it at a high level — do NOT itemize its internal behaviours or polish (button-press feedback, a pre-selected sole option, a toggle label, the default language) as "changes" or "fixes". There is no prior version to compare against, so those read as noise. Report detail only as a change relative to what users already had.

Weight matches work; categorize by feature, not a "Fixes" bucket. A large body of work must not be compressed below a minor item. Polish that is part of a new feature belongs under that feature (or is omitted per the first-release rule). A standalone Fix — X bullet is reserved for a change to a PRE-EXISTING shipped feature (e.g. the E235-1000 8-station view), never to something new this release.

Don't:

• Include refactor / cleanup commits (clip-rect, helper consolidation) unless they fix a visible regression. Internal hygiene is invisible to end users.
• Cite commit hashes or PR numbers (links rot; the GitHub release page shows the diff already).
• Mention WIP docs, memory logs, daily-log entries, skill updates, or rule codifications.
• List individual data tweaks (per-station JA fix, single-station populated) unless aggregate-newsworthy. Roll up: "27 new translations" / "12 stations populated."
• Lead with implementation jargon. "GOLDEN-rule row-grouping" → "Per-station transfer-info display showing connecting lines."
• Narrate prior behavior or the bug's backstory. Users don't care what it used to do — state only what they get now. "English lower LCD used to show Japanese; now renders English" → "English lower LCD." Drop the "previously / now-fixed" framing entirely.
• Over-explain a user-facing change with internal mechanics. Once the headline conveys the capability, stop — trim supporting clauses that only describe how it works.

Distribution footer — update if the bundled folder list changed since the prior release. v0.5.3 ships ocr_templates/ for the first time → mention it in the footer.

Step 5 — Hard stop for user review

Print the drafted release_notes.md and wait for explicit user approval before proceeding.

Drafted release_notes.md is below — review and confirm. Reply "ship it" /
"go" / "approved" to proceed; or tell me what to change. Until you do, no
tag is created and no upload is queued.

Don't tag, don't push, don't run gh in this step — the user owns the publish decision.

Step 6 — Tag (after user approval)

git tag -a "v$VERSION" -m "v$VERSION"
git push origin "v$VERSION"
git push origin master

Push the tag AND any unpushed master commits — the tag annotates a specific SHA, and that SHA must be on origin or gh release create --verify-tag will fail.

Step 7 — Hand off to user for upload

Print the exact gh release create command for the user to copy-paste. Do not run it — release upload is the user's call.

Format rule — emit a SINGLE LINE with the version literal already substituted. No backticks, no backslashes, no shell variables. The user runs git ops in Git Bash; backtick-continuations (PowerShell line break) are eaten by Bash and cause only the first line to execute, creating an empty release. A single line works in PowerShell, Git Bash, and cmd identically. Substituting the literal (v0.5.3 not v$VERSION) avoids variable-expansion mismatch between shells.

Tag v<VERSION> pushed. Run this to publish the release (works in PowerShell or Git Bash):

gh release create v<VERSION> --title "v<VERSION>" --notes-file release_notes.md --verify-tag "dist/JRE-PA-Simulator.exe" "dist-release/JRE-PA-Simulator-v<VERSION>-distribution.zip"

After it succeeds, view the release at:
https://github.com/ksleungac/pids-jre-simulator/releases/tag/v<VERSION>

<VERSION> is the literal value resolved in Step 1 — substitute before printing.

Out of scope

• Building: that's /build. If artifacts are missing, halt; direct user.
• Running gh release create: user runs it. Skill stops at handing off the command.
• Modifying pyproject.toml / source for version bump: not needed; version is a build-time label only (per /build skill's stance).
• Post-release announcements (YouTube, Twitter, etc.): user-driven.

Why these choices

• Skill stops before upload, not before tag. Tagging is reversible (git tag -d + git push origin :refs/tags/...); uploading creates a public artifact users may have downloaded by the time you notice a problem. The split puts the irreversible step in user hands.
• Notes are drafted, not auto-generated. release.ps1's auto-generation produces commit-subject-shaped bullets that read like git log, not like user-facing notes. The skill's draft is a starting point for the user to edit; the criterion (ships-in-zip) is the filter, not the formatting.
• Cross-check the prior release's structure. v0.5.2's release_notes.md is the format reference; staying consistent across releases makes the GitHub release page predictable for the public audience.
• No re-build. /build already produced the artifacts and the user smoke-tested them. Re-building under release.ps1 wastes time AND introduces a non-zero risk of "the binary that was tested isn't the binary that ships" — the skill ships the exact bytes the user verified.