rag-mastery

name	rag-mastery
description	Consolidated master domain for rag mastery.
version	1
author	Antigravity

RAG-MASTERY

[!IMPORTANT] This skill MUST be executed strictly under the Omni-Architect Agent Protocol v1.0. All tool executions, code modifications, and communications MUST adhere to the 13 core protocols.

rag / SKILL.md

---

name: rag-implementation description: "Retrieval-Augmented Generation patterns including chunking, embeddings, vector stores, and retrieval optimization Use when: rag, retrieval augmented, vector search, embeddings, semantic search." source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)

RAG Implementation

You're a RAG specialist who has built systems serving millions of queries over terabytes of documents. You've seen the naive "chunk and embed" approach fail, and developed sophisticated chunking, retrieval, and reranking strategies.

You understand that RAG is not just vector search—it's about getting the right information to the LLM at the right time. You know when RAG helps and when it's unnecessary overhead.

Your core principles:

1. Chunking is critical—bad chunks mean bad retrieval
2. Hybri

Capabilities

• document-chunking
• embedding-models
• vector-stores
• retrieval-strategies
• hybrid-search
• reranking

Patterns

Semantic Chunking

Chunk by meaning, not arbitrary size

Hybrid Search

Combine dense (vector) and sparse (keyword) search

Contextual Reranking

Rerank retrieved docs with LLM for relevance

Anti-Patterns

❌ Fixed-Size Chunking

❌ No Overlap

❌ Single Retrieval Strategy

⚠️ Sharp Edges

Issue	Severity	Solution
Poor chunking ruins retrieval quality	critical	// Use recursive character text splitter with overlap
Query and document embeddings from different models	critical	// Ensure consistent embedding model usage
RAG adds significant latency to responses	high	// Optimize RAG latency
Documents updated but embeddings not refreshed	medium	// Maintain sync between documents and embeddings

Related Skills

Works well with: context-window-management, conversation-memory, prompt-caching, data-pipeline

rag / SKILL.md

---

name: rag-engineer description: "Expert in building Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. Masters embedding models, vector databases, chunking strategies, and retrieval optimization for LLM applications. Use when: building RAG, vector search, embeddings, semantic search, document retrieval." source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)

RAG Engineer

Role: RAG Systems Architect

I bridge the gap between raw documents and LLM understanding. I know that retrieval quality determines generation quality - garbage in, garbage out. I obsess over chunking boundaries, embedding dimensions, and similarity metrics because they make the difference between helpful and hallucinating.

Capabilities

• Vector embeddings and similarity search
• Document chunking and preprocessing
• Retrieval pipeline design
• Semantic search implementation
• Context window optimization
• Hybrid search (keyword + semantic)

Requirements

• LLM fundamentals
• Understanding of embeddings
• Basic NLP concepts

Patterns

Semantic Chunking

Chunk by meaning, not arbitrary token counts

- Use sentence boundaries, not token limits
- Detect topic shifts with embedding similarity
- Preserve document structure (headers, paragraphs)
- Include overlap for context continuity
- Add metadata for filtering

Hierarchical Retrieval

Multi-level retrieval for better precision

- Index at multiple chunk sizes (paragraph, section, document)
- First pass: coarse retrieval for candidates
- Second pass: fine-grained retrieval for precision
- Use parent-child relationships for context

Hybrid Search

Combine semantic and keyword search

- BM25/TF-IDF for keyword matching
- Vector similarity for semantic matching
- Reciprocal Rank Fusion for combining scores
- Weight tuning based on query type

Anti-Patterns

❌ Fixed Chunk Size

❌ Embedding Everything

❌ Ignoring Evaluation

⚠️ Sharp Edges

Issue	Severity	Solution
Fixed-size chunking breaks sentences and context	high	Use semantic chunking that respects document structure:
Pure semantic search without metadata pre-filtering	medium	Implement hybrid filtering:
Using same embedding model for different content types	medium	Evaluate embeddings per content type:
Using first-stage retrieval results directly	medium	Add reranking step:
Cramming maximum context into LLM prompt	medium	Use relevance thresholds:
Not measuring retrieval quality separately from generation	high	Separate retrieval evaluation:
Not updating embeddings when source documents change	medium	Implement embedding refresh:
Same retrieval strategy for all query types	medium	Implement hybrid search:

Related Skills

Works well with: ai-agents-architect, prompt-engineer, database-architect, backend

rag-eng / SKILL.md

---

name: rag-eng description: "Expert in building Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. Masters embedding models, vector databases, chunking strategies, and retrieval optimization for LLM applications. Use when: building RAG, vector search, embeddings, semantic search, document retrieval." source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)

RAG Engineer

Role: RAG Systems Architect

I bridge the gap between raw documents and LLM understanding. I know that retrieval quality determines generation quality - garbage in, garbage out. I obsess over chunking boundaries, embedding dimensions, and similarity metrics because they make the difference between helpful and hallucinating.

Capabilities

• Vector embeddings and similarity search
• Document chunking and preprocessing
• Retrieval pipeline design
• Semantic search implementation
• Context window optimization
• Hybrid search (keyword + semantic)

Requirements

• LLM fundamentals
• Understanding of embeddings
• Basic NLP concepts

Patterns

Semantic Chunking

Chunk by meaning, not arbitrary token counts

- Use sentence boundaries, not token limits
- Detect topic shifts with embedding similarity
- Preserve document structure (headers, paragraphs)
- Include overlap for context continuity
- Add metadata for filtering

Hierarchical Retrieval

Multi-level retrieval for better precision

- Index at multiple chunk sizes (paragraph, section, document)
- First pass: coarse retrieval for candidates
- Second pass: fine-grained retrieval for precision
- Use parent-child relationships for context

Hybrid Search

Combine semantic and keyword search

- BM25/TF-IDF for keyword matching
- Vector similarity for semantic matching
- Reciprocal Rank Fusion for combining scores
- Weight tuning based on query type

Anti-Patterns

❌ Fixed Chunk Size

❌ Embedding Everything

❌ Ignoring Evaluation

⚠️ Sharp Edges

Issue	Severity	Solution
Fixed-size chunking breaks sentences and context	high	Use semantic chunking that respects document structure:
Pure semantic search without metadata pre-filtering	medium	Implement hybrid filtering:
Using same embedding model for different content types	medium	Evaluate embeddings per content type:
Using first-stage retrieval results directly	medium	Add reranking step:
Cramming maximum context into LLM prompt	medium	Use relevance thresholds:
Not measuring retrieval quality separately from generation	high	Separate retrieval evaluation:
Not updating embeddings when source documents change	medium	Implement embedding refresh:
Same retrieval strategy for all query types	medium	Implement hybrid search:

Related Skills

Works well with: ai-agents-architect, prompt-engineer, database-architect, backend

rag-impl / SKILL.md

---

name: rag-impl description: "Retrieval-Augmented Generation patterns including chunking, embeddings, vector stores, and retrieval optimization Use when: rag, retrieval augmented, vector search, embeddings, semantic search." source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)

RAG Implementation

You're a RAG specialist who has built systems serving millions of queries over terabytes of documents. You've seen the naive "chunk and embed" approach fail, and developed sophisticated chunking, retrieval, and reranking strategies.

You understand that RAG is not just vector search—it's about getting the right information to the LLM at the right time. You know when RAG helps and when it's unnecessary overhead.

Your core principles:

1. Chunking is critical—bad chunks mean bad retrieval
2. Hybri

Capabilities

• document-chunking
• embedding-models
• vector-stores
• retrieval-strategies
• hybrid-search
• reranking

Patterns

Semantic Chunking

Chunk by meaning, not arbitrary size

Hybrid Search

Combine dense (vector) and sparse (keyword) search

Contextual Reranking

Rerank retrieved docs with LLM for relevance

Anti-Patterns

❌ Fixed-Size Chunking

❌ No Overlap

❌ Single Retrieval Strategy

⚠️ Sharp Edges

Issue	Severity	Solution
Poor chunking ruins retrieval quality	critical	// Use recursive character text splitter with overlap
Query and document embeddings from different models	critical	// Ensure consistent embedding model usage
RAG adds significant latency to responses	high	// Optimize RAG latency
Documents updated but embeddings not refreshed	medium	// Maintain sync between documents and embeddings

Related Skills

Works well with: context-window-management, conversation-memory, prompt-caching, data-pipeline

embeddings / SKILL.md

---

name: embeddings description: Select and optimize embedding models for semantic search and RAG applications. Use when choosing embedding models, implementing chunking strategies, or optimizing embedding quality for specific domains.

Embedding Strategies

Guide to selecting and optimizing embedding models for vector search applications.

Do not use this skill when

• The task is unrelated to embedding strategies
• You need a different domain or tool outside this scope

Instructions

• Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
• Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
• Provide actionable steps and verification.
• If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.

Use this skill when

• Choosing embedding models for RAG
• Optimizing chunking strategies
• Fine-tuning embeddings for domains
• Comparing embedding model performance
• Reducing embedding dimensions
• Handling multilingual content

Core Concepts

1. Embedding Model Comparison

Model	Dimensions	Max Tokens	Best For
text-embedding-3-large	3072	8191	High accuracy
text-embedding-3-small	1536	8191	Cost-effective
voyage-2	1024	4000	Code, legal
bge-large-en-v1.5	1024	512	Open source
all-MiniLM-L6-v2	384	256	Fast, lightweight
multilingual-e5-large	1024	512	Multi-language

2. Embedding Pipeline

Document → Chunking → Preprocessing → Embedding Model → Vector
                ↓
        [Overlap, Size]  [Clean, Normalize]  [API/Local]

Templates

Template 1: OpenAI Embeddings

from openai import OpenAI
from typing import List
import numpy as np

client = OpenAI()

def get_embeddings(
    texts: List[str],
    model: str = "text-embedding-3-small",
    dimensions: int = None
) -> List[List[float]]:
    """Get embeddings from OpenAI."""
    # Handle batching for large lists
    batch_size = 100
    all_embeddings = []

    for i in range(0, len(texts), batch_size):
        batch = texts[i:i + batch_size]

        kwargs = {"input": batch, "model": model}
        if dimensions:
            kwargs["dimensions"] = dimensions

        response = client.embeddings.create(**kwargs)
        embeddings = [item.embedding for item in response.data]
        all_embeddings.extend(embeddings)

    return all_embeddings

def get_embedding(text: str, **kwargs) -> List[float]:
    """Get single embedding."""
    return get_embeddings([text], **kwargs)[0]

# Dimension reduction with OpenAI
def get_reduced_embedding(text: str, dimensions: int = 512) -> List[float]:
    """Get embedding with reduced dimensions (Matryoshka)."""
    return get_embedding(
        text,
        model="text-embedding-3-small",
        dimensions=dimensions
    )

Template 2: Local Embeddings with Sentence Transformers

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
from typing import List, Optional
import numpy as np

class LocalEmbedder:
    """Local embedding with sentence-transformers."""

    def __init__(
        self,
        model_name: str = "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5",
        device: str = "cuda"
    ):
        self.model = SentenceTransformer(model_name, device=device)

    def embed(
        self,
        texts: List[str],
        normalize: bool = True,
        show_progress: bool = False
    ) -> np.ndarray:
        """Embed texts with optional normalization."""
        embeddings = self.model.encode(
            texts,
            normalize_embeddings=normalize,
            show_progress_bar=show_progress,
            convert_to_numpy=True
        )
        return embeddings

    def embed_query(self, query: str) -> np.ndarray:
        """Embed a query with BGE-style prefix."""
        # BGE models benefit from query prefix
        if "bge" in self.model.get_sentence_embedding_dimension():
            query = f"Represent this sentence for searching relevant passages: {query}"
        return self.embed([query])[0]

    def embed_documents(self, documents: List[str]) -> np.ndarray:
        """Embed documents for indexing."""
        return self.embed(documents)

# E5 model with instructions
class E5Embedder:
    def __init__(self, model_name: str = "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large"):
        self.model = SentenceTransformer(model_name)

    def embed_query(self, query: str) -> np.ndarray:
        return self.model.encode(f"query: {query}")

    def embed_document(self, document: str) -> np.ndarray:
        return self.model.encode(f"passage: {document}")

Template 3: Chunking Strategies

from typing import List, Tuple
import re

def chunk_by_tokens(
    text: str,
    chunk_size: int = 512,
    chunk_overlap: int = 50,
    tokenizer=None
) -> List[str]:
    """Chunk text by token count."""
    import tiktoken
    tokenizer = tokenizer or tiktoken.get_encoding("cl100k_base")

    tokens = tokenizer.encode(text)
    chunks = []

    start = 0
    while start < len(tokens):
        end = start + chunk_size
        chunk_tokens = tokens[start:end]
        chunk_text = tokenizer.decode(chunk_tokens)
        chunks.append(chunk_text)
        start = end - chunk_overlap

    return chunks

def chunk_by_sentences(
    text: str,
    max_chunk_size: int = 1000,
    min_chunk_size: int = 100
) -> List[str]:
    """Chunk text by sentences, respecting size limits."""
    import nltk
    sentences = nltk.sent_tokenize(text)

    chunks = []
    current_chunk = []
    current_size = 0

    for sentence in sentences:
        sentence_size = len(sentence)

        if current_size + sentence_size > max_chunk_size and current_chunk:
            chunks.append(" ".join(current_chunk))
            current_chunk = []
            current_size = 0

        current_chunk.append(sentence)
        current_size += sentence_size

    if current_chunk:
        chunks.append(" ".join(current_chunk))

    return chunks

def chunk_by_semantic_sections(
    text: str,
    headers_pattern: str = r'^#{1,3}\s+.+$'
) -> List[Tuple[str, str]]:
    """Chunk markdown by headers, preserving hierarchy."""
    lines = text.split('\n')
    chunks = []
    current_header = ""
    current_content = []

    for line in lines:
        if re.match(headers_pattern, line, re.MULTILINE):
            if current_content:
                chunks.append((current_header, '\n'.join(current_content)))
            current_header = line
            current_content = []
        else:
            current_content.append(line)

    if current_content:
        chunks.append((current_header, '\n'.join(current_content)))

    return chunks

def recursive_character_splitter(
    text: str,
    chunk_size: int = 1000,
    chunk_overlap: int = 200,
    separators: List[str] = None
) -> List[str]:
    """LangChain-style recursive splitter."""
    separators = separators or ["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " ", ""]

    def split_text(text: str, separators: List[str]) -> List[str]:
        if not text:
            return []

        separator = separators[0]
        remaining_separators = separators[1:]

        if separator == "":
            # Character-level split
            return [text[i:i+chunk_size] for i in range(0, len(text), chunk_size - chunk_overlap)]

        splits = text.split(separator)
        chunks = []
        current_chunk = []
        current_length = 0

        for split in splits:
            split_length = len(split) + len(separator)

            if current_length + split_length > chunk_size and current_chunk:
                chunk_text = separator.join(current_chunk)

                # Recursively split if still too large
                if len(chunk_text) > chunk_size and remaining_separators:
                    chunks.extend(split_text(chunk_text, remaining_separators))
                else:
                    chunks.append(chunk_text)

                # Start new chunk with overlap
                overlap_splits = []
                overlap_length = 0
                for s in reversed(current_chunk):
                    if overlap_length + len(s) <= chunk_overlap:
                        overlap_splits.insert(0, s)
                        overlap_length += len(s)
                    else:
                        break
                current_chunk = overlap_splits
                current_length = overlap_length

            current_chunk.append(split)
            current_length += split_length

        if current_chunk:
            chunks.append(separator.join(current_chunk))

        return chunks

    return split_text(text, separators)

Template 4: Domain-Specific Embedding Pipeline

class DomainEmbeddingPipeline:
    """Pipeline for domain-specific embeddings."""

    def __init__(
        self,
        embedding_model: str = "text-embedding-3-small",
        chunk_size: int = 512,
        chunk_overlap: int = 50,
        preprocessing_fn=None
    ):
        self.embedding_model = embedding_model
        self.chunk_size = chunk_size
        self.chunk_overlap = chunk_overlap
        self.preprocess = preprocessing_fn or self._default_preprocess

    def _default_preprocess(self, text: str) -> str:
        """Default preprocessing."""
        # Remove excessive whitespace
        text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text)
        # Remove special characters
        text = re.sub(r'[^\w\s.,!?-]', '', text)
        return text.strip()

    async def process_documents(
        self,
        documents: List[dict],
        id_field: str = "id",
        content_field: str = "content",
        metadata_fields: List[str] = None
    ) -> List[dict]:
        """Process documents for vector storage."""
        processed = []

        for doc in documents:
            content = doc[content_field]
            doc_id = doc[id_field]

            # Preprocess
            cleaned = self.preprocess(content)

            # Chunk
            chunks = chunk_by_tokens(
                cleaned,
                self.chunk_size,
                self.chunk_overlap
            )

            # Create embeddings
            embeddings = get_embeddings(chunks, self.embedding_model)

            # Create records
            for i, (chunk, embedding) in enumerate(zip(chunks, embeddings)):
                record = {
                    "id": f"{doc_id}_chunk_{i}",
                    "document_id": doc_id,
                    "chunk_index": i,
                    "text": chunk,
                    "embedding": embedding
                }

                # Add metadata
                if metadata_fields:
                    for field in metadata_fields:
                        if field in doc:
                            record[field] = doc[field]

                processed.append(record)

        return processed

# Code-specific pipeline
class CodeEmbeddingPipeline:
    """Specialized pipeline for code embeddings."""

    def __init__(self, model: str = "voyage-code-2"):
        self.model = model

    def chunk_code(self, code: str, language: str) -> List[dict]:
        """Chunk code by functions/classes."""
        import tree_sitter

        # Parse with tree-sitter
        # Extract functions, classes, methods
        # Return chunks with context
        pass

    def embed_with_context(self, chunk: str, context: str) -> List[float]:
        """Embed code with surrounding context."""
        combined = f"Context: {context}\n\nCode:\n{chunk}"
        return get_embedding(combined, model=self.model)

Template 5: Embedding Quality Evaluation

import numpy as np
from typing import List, Tuple

def evaluate_retrieval_quality(
    queries: List[str],
    relevant_docs: List[List[str]],  # List of relevant doc IDs per query
    retrieved_docs: List[List[str]],  # List of retrieved doc IDs per query
    k: int = 10
) -> dict:
    """Evaluate embedding quality for retrieval."""

    def precision_at_k(relevant: set, retrieved: List[str], k: int) -> float:
        retrieved_k = retrieved[:k]
        relevant_retrieved = len(set(retrieved_k) & relevant)
        return relevant_retrieved / k

    def recall_at_k(relevant: set, retrieved: List[str], k: int) -> float:
        retrieved_k = retrieved[:k]
        relevant_retrieved = len(set(retrieved_k) & relevant)
        return relevant_retrieved / len(relevant) if relevant else 0

    def mrr(relevant: set, retrieved: List[str]) -> float:
        for i, doc in enumerate(retrieved):
            if doc in relevant:
                return 1 / (i + 1)
        return 0

    def ndcg_at_k(relevant: set, retrieved: List[str], k: int) -> float:
        dcg = sum(
            1 / np.log2(i + 2) if doc in relevant else 0
            for i, doc in enumerate(retrieved[:k])
        )
        ideal_dcg = sum(1 / np.log2(i + 2) for i in range(min(len(relevant), k)))
        return dcg / ideal_dcg if ideal_dcg > 0 else 0

    metrics = {
        f"precision@{k}": [],
        f"recall@{k}": [],
        "mrr": [],
        f"ndcg@{k}": []
    }

    for relevant, retrieved in zip(relevant_docs, retrieved_docs):
        relevant_set = set(relevant)
        metrics[f"precision@{k}"].append(precision_at_k(relevant_set, retrieved, k))
        metrics[f"recall@{k}"].append(recall_at_k(relevant_set, retrieved, k))
        metrics["mrr"].append(mrr(relevant_set, retrieved))
        metrics[f"ndcg@{k}"].append(ndcg_at_k(relevant_set, retrieved, k))

    return {name: np.mean(values) for name, values in metrics.items()}

def compute_embedding_similarity(
    embeddings1: np.ndarray,
    embeddings2: np.ndarray,
    metric: str = "cosine"
) -> np.ndarray:
    """Compute similarity matrix between embedding sets."""
    if metric == "cosine":
        # Normalize
        norm1 = embeddings1 / np.linalg.norm(embeddings1, axis=1, keepdims=True)
        norm2 = embeddings2 / np.linalg.norm(embeddings2, axis=1, keepdims=True)
        return norm1 @ norm2.T
    elif metric == "euclidean":
        from scipy.spatial.distance import cdist
        return -cdist(embeddings1, embeddings2, metric='euclidean')
    elif metric == "dot":
        return embeddings1 @ embeddings2.T

Best Practices

Do's

• Match model to use case - Code vs prose vs multilingual
• Chunk thoughtfully - Preserve semantic boundaries
• Normalize embeddings - For cosine similarity
• Batch requests - More efficient than one-by-one
• Cache embeddings - Avoid recomputing

Don'ts

• Don't ignore token limits - Truncation loses info
• Don't mix embedding models - Incompatible spaces
• Don't skip preprocessing - Garbage in, garbage out
• Don't over-chunk - Lose context

Resources

• OpenAI Embeddings
• Sentence Transformers
• MTEB Benchmark