| name | literature-search |
| description | Academic literature search best practices and strategies. |
| metadata | {"nanobot": {"always": true}} |
Literature Search Skill
This skill guides you on how to effectively search for academic papers.
Core Principles
- Use English keywords — Academic databases are primarily English-based. Even for Chinese queries, translate to English for searching.
- Start broad, then narrow — Begin with 2-3 core keywords, then add constraints (year, method, dataset).
- Exploit multiple sources — arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, PubMed each have strengths.
Keyword Construction
Basic Rules
- Use specific technical terms over general words: "transformer efficiency" beats "fast neural network"
- Include method + task + dataset when possible: "LoRA fine-tuning LLaMA CommonsenseQA"
- Use abbreviations AND full names in OR queries: "(LLM OR large language model)"
Advanced arXiv Query Syntax
cat:cs.CL AND ("chain of thought" OR CoT) AND NOT survey
cat:cs.CL — Computational Linguistics category
AND / OR / AND NOT — Boolean operators
"exact phrase" — Phrase search
au:Smith_J — Author search
Example Queries by Intent
| User Intent | Search Query |
|---|
| "LLM推理加速" | cat:cs.CL AND ("inference acceleration" OR "speculative decoding" OR "KV cache" OR "quantization") AND "large language model" |
| "Transformer效率" | cat:cs.LG AND ("transformer efficiency" OR "linear attention" OR "flash attention" OR "sparse attention") |
| "多模态融合" | cat:cs.CV AND ("multimodal fusion" OR "vision language model" OR "cross-modal") |
| "图神经网络综述" | cat:cs.LG AND ("graph neural network" OR GNN) AND (survey OR review) |
Search Strategy Workflow
Step 1: Quick Scan (5 minutes)
- Search with 2-3 core keywords,
max_results=10
- Read titles and abstracts only
- Goal: understand the terminology landscape
Step 2: Targeted Search (10 minutes)
- Refine keywords based on Step 1 findings
- Add year constraint if needed:
submittedDate:[20240101 TO 20241231]
- Search with
max_results=20
- Identify 3-5 most relevant papers
Step 3: Snowballing
- For each key paper, use
get_related_papers or citation_graph
- Check references (what they built upon) and citations (who built upon them)
- This often finds the most impactful papers missed by keyword search
Source-Specific Tips
arXiv
- Strengths: Latest preprints, CS/Physics/Math heavy
- Best for: Cutting-edge methods, benchmark papers
- Tip: Use
export.arxiv.org API for structured results; check announce_type for updates
Semantic Scholar
- Strengths: Citation counts, influential citations, author disambiguation
- Best for: Finding highly-cited foundational papers
- Tip: Filter by "highly influential" citations rather than raw count
Google Scholar
- Strengths: Broadest coverage, includes books/theses
- Best for: Interdisciplinary topics, finding older foundational work
- Tip: Use "Cited by" and "Related articles" features
Common Pitfalls
- ❌ Using too many AND terms → zero results
- ❌ Searching only in Chinese → misses 90% of literature
- ❌ Ignoring publication year → wasting time on outdated methods
- ❌ Not checking citations → missing follow-up improvements