| name | speq-implement |
| description | Orchestrate implementation of reviewed plans according to the spec deltas. Arg: <plan-name>. |
| model | sonnet |
Spec Implementer (Orchestrator)
Orchestrate implementation of plans in specs/_plans/<plan-name>.
Orchestration (reading tasks.md, dispatching sub-agents, verifying results) is tool-call heavy but not reasoning-heavy. The sub-agents do the heavy lifting — each pins its own model and effort in its frontmatter:
| Sub-agent | When used |
|---|
implementer-agent | Standard tasks (default) |
implementer-expert-agent | Tasks tagged [expert] in tasks.md |
code-reviewer | Final review of all changed files |
Get plan name from user prompt or ask if none specified.
Required Skills
Invoke before starting:
/speq-code-tools — Semantic code navigation and editing
/speq-ext-research — Library documentation and research
/speq-code-guardrails — TDD cycle and quality standards
/speq-cli — spec discovery
/speq-writing-guardrails — Prose style for artifacts and GitHub text
Subagents (implementer-agent, implementer-expert-agent, code-reviewer) must also invoke their required skills.
Orchestrator Role
The main agent acts as orchestrator:
- Creates and maintains
tasks.md for persistence
- Spawns sub-agents for parallel task groups
- Updates task status after sub-agent completion
- Never implements directly — delegates all coding work
- Rotates sub-agents to maintain fresh context windows
Context Window Management
Strategy: Rotate sub-agents to maintain fresh context.
| Setting | Default | Description |
|---|
max_tasks_per_agent | 5 | Tasks before considering rotation |
checkpoint_interval | 2-3 | Tasks between progress reports |
Rotation workflow:
- Sub-agent completes tasks, updates tasks.md after each
- Sub-agent reports checkpoint after 2-3 tasks
- If max_tasks reached OR sub-agent reports "ROTATION NEEDED":
- Read tasks.md for current state
- Note completed tasks from sub-agent return
- Spawn fresh agent with remaining tasks
- Continue until group complete
Workflow
Phase 0: Load Project Hook (orchestrator)
Check for .speq/implement-hook.md in the repo root.
- Present: read it. Announce "Loaded project hook: .speq/implement-hook.md". Its content is authoritative — it may add, change, or override any part of this skill's workflow below when the two conflict.
- Absent: continue normally, no mention.
Note it (not its full content) as a Project Hook: line in every sub-agent brief below — implementer-agent, implementer-expert-agent, and code-reviewer read it themselves from that path when noted.
Phase 1: Load Plan
Read: specs/_plans/<plan-name>/plan.md
Extract: feature specs, implementation tasks, parallelization groups, verification commands.
Phase 2: Create Tasks
Decompose the plan into a Work Breakdown Structure in specs/_plans/<plan-name>/tasks.md.
Format:
# Tasks: <plan-name>
## Phase 2: Implementation (Group A)
- [ ] 2.1 <task from plan>
- [ ] 2.2 <task from plan> [expert]
## Phase 2: Implementation (Group B)
- [ ] 2.3 <task from plan>
## Phase 3: Verification
- [ ] 3.1 Run test suite
- [ ] 3.2 Run linter
Status markers:
[ ] pending
[~] started
[x] completed
Difficulty tags:
[expert] — tagged by planner-agent during planning. Routes the task to implementer-expert-agent. Preserve the tag through every status transition.
- untagged — routed to
implementer-agent. Most tasks are untagged.
If the plan did not tag any tasks but you encounter a task that clearly warrants expert reasoning (e.g. concurrency, cross-file refactor, novel algorithm), you MAY add [expert] when materializing tasks.md. Do this sparingly — over-tagging wastes tokens.
Also create runtime tasks:
For each task in tasks.md:
TaskCreate(subject, description, activeForm)
Phase 3: Implement (Orchestrated)
For each parallel group in plan's ## Parallelization:
- Partition tasks by tag — Split the group into
expert_tasks (tagged [expert]) and standard_tasks (untagged)
- Mark started — Update tasks.md:
[ ] → [~]
- Spawn subagent(s) — Route by tag:
- Standard tasks →
implementer-agent
- Expert tasks →
implementer-expert-agent
- Spawn in parallel when both exist and they touch disjoint files; otherwise sequence expert first (they often set up invariants the standard tasks rely on)
- Await completion — Each sub-agent returns with results or rotation signal
- Handle rotation — If a sub-agent signals rotation, spawn fresh agent of the SAME type with remaining tasks of that tag
- Mark completed — Update tasks.md:
[~] → [x] (preserve [expert] tag)
- Update TaskTools —
TaskUpdate(taskId, status: "completed")
- Next group — Proceed to next parallel group
Standard subagent invocation:
Delegate to implementer-agent — Implement <group-name> standard tasks
## Your Tasks (standard)
{standard_task_list}
## Context
- Plan: specs/_plans/{plan_name}/plan.md
- Tasks file: specs/_plans/{plan_name}/tasks.md
- Update tasks.md after each task completion (preserve task numbering)
- Report checkpoint after every 2-3 tasks
- Project Hook: <if active, ".speq/implement-hook.md — read it and apply it"; otherwise omit this line>
Expert subagent invocation:
Delegate to implementer-expert-agent — Implement <group-name> expert tasks
## Your Tasks (expert — reasoning-heavy)
{expert_task_list}
## Context
- Plan: specs/_plans/{plan_name}/plan.md
- Tasks file: specs/_plans/{plan_name}/tasks.md
- Preserve the [expert] tag when updating status markers
- Checkpoint after every 1-2 tasks (expert tasks are heavier)
- Report key reasoning / invariants applied
- Project Hook: <if active, ".speq/implement-hook.md — read it and apply it"; otherwise omit this line>
Phase 4: Code Review
After implementation completes, review all changed files.
- Collect changed files —
git diff --name-only <base>...HEAD
- Spawn code-reviewer agent:
Delegate to code-reviewer — Review implementation quality
## Changed Files
{changed_files_list}
## Context
- Plan: specs/_plans/{plan_name}/plan.md
- Review for: guardrail violations, dead code, obsolete tests, bad comments, optimizations, YAGNI/over-engineering
- Structure findings using the **Pyramid Principle**: group by theme, lead each group with the key finding, support with evidence.
- Project Hook: <if active, ".speq/implement-hook.md — read it and apply it"; otherwise omit this line>
- Process findings — If findings exist:
- Create fix tasks in
tasks.md for every finding
- Tag a fix task
[expert] when the finding involves subtle correctness, concurrency, or cross-file reasoning
- Route fix tasks by tag:
implementer-agent for untagged, implementer-expert-agent for [expert]
- Proceed to verification — Phase 5 verifies all tests pass
Phase 5: Verification
5a. Automated Checks
Execute commands from plan's ## Verification > Checklist:
- Build → exit 0
- Test → 0 failures
- Lint → 0 errors
- Format → no changes
5b. Scenario Coverage Audit
Cross-reference plan's ## Verification > Scenario Coverage against test results:
- Every listed scenario → corresponding test exists and passes
- Flag any scenario without a passing test as incomplete
5c. Manual Verification
Execute each step from plan's ## Verification > Manual Testing:
- Run documented commands against the built software
- Capture actual output as evidence for the verification report
- Mark pass/fail per feature
Update tasks.md verification tasks as completed.
Phase 6: Verification Report
Generate using references/verification-template.md. Structure the report BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): lead with pass/fail verdict and summary before evidence details.
Save to: specs/_plans/<plan-name>/verification-report.md
Phase 7: Completion
✓ All tasks in tasks.md marked [x]
✓ Code review passed (or findings fixed)
✓ Verification passed
✓ Report generated
Ready for: /speq-record <plan-name>
Context Recovery
If context is lost or compacted:
- Read
specs/_plans/<plan-name>/tasks.md
- Identify incomplete tasks (
[ ] or [~])
- Resume from first incomplete task
- Continue orchestration workflow
References
| File | Use When |
|---|
references/tdd-cycle-checklist.md | Sub-agent TDD reference |
references/task-flow.md | Task lifecycle management |
references/verification-template.md | Phase 6 report generation |