strategic-proposal

name	strategic-proposal
description	Spawn 5 domain experts to propose roadmap items, then an AI council drafts a roadmap, a Strategic Critic challenges it, and the council finalizes with revisions. Updates the pinned roadmap issue and /roadmap page data. TRIGGER when: asked to build roadmap, prioritize features, strategic proposal, "what should we build next", or rank product priorities.

Strategic Proposal

Spawn 5 specialized expert sub-agents in parallel, each proposing roadmap items from their domain. An Expert AI Council drafts the roadmap, a Strategic Critic challenges it with adversarial backpressure, and the Council finalizes with revisions. The result is published as a pinned GitHub issue and written to src/data/roadmap.ts.

Core principle: SIGNAL OVER FEATURES. Items require evidence of user demand before entering "Build Now" phase. Infrastructure prerequisites are exempt. The Critic ensures the council isn't inflating signal or sandbagging complexity.

Decision Flow

flowchart TD
    A["Guard: gh auth status"] --> B{Authenticated?}
    B -->|No| SKIP["Log: SKIP — gh not authenticated"]
    SKIP --> MEM_SKIP[Memory Protocol]
    MEM_SKIP --> Z_SKIP[HEARTBEAT_OK]

    B -->|Yes| C["Gather context: IDENTITY, MEMORY, schema, routes, issues"]
    C --> D["Compose Current State Briefing"]
    D --> E["Spawn 5 experts IN ONE MESSAGE (parallel sonnet)"]

    E --> E1["Expert: Product"]
    E --> E2["Expert: Docs"]
    E --> E3["Expert: Security"]
    E --> E4["Expert: Registry"]
    E --> E5["Expert: Agent Systems"]

    E1 & E2 & E3 & E4 & E5 --> F["Strategic Council DRAFT (opus)"]
    F --> CRITIC["Strategic Critic (sonnet)<br>Challenge signal, feasibility,<br>phase assignments, dependencies"]
    CRITIC --> F2["Strategic Council FINAL (opus)<br>Incorporate critique, revise or defend"]
    F2 --> G["Find/create pinned issue (label: roadmap)"]
    G --> H["Update pinned issue body"]
    H --> I["Write roadmap data to src/data/roadmap.ts"]
    I --> MEM_OP[Memory Protocol]
    MEM_OP --> Z_OP["Report: roadmap updated"]

Instructions

1. Guard: gh CLI authentication

gh auth status 2>&1

If this fails, log [strategic-proposal] SKIP: gh CLI not authenticated → Memory Protocol → HEARTBEAT_OK. Stop.

2. Gather context

Read the following to build the briefing:

• IDENTITY.md — stack, mission, URLs
• MEMORY.md — past decisions, lessons learned
• Makefile, scripts/, install/ — orchestrator entrypoints and provisioning surface
• apps/docs/ — documentation site source
• Open issues: gh api "repos/ryaneggz/open-harness/issues?state=open&per_page=50"
• Repo stats: gh api repos/ryaneggz/open-harness --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count, forks: .forks_count}'

3. Compose the Current State Briefing

Assemble a structured markdown briefing to pass to ALL 5 experts:

## Current State Briefing

### Product Vision
1. Document Open Harness — the parent framework for AI agent sandboxes
2. Let users promote their forks — fork registry/showcase
3. End goal: curate Docker registries with monthly licensing — SaaS marketplace

### App State
- Routes: [list from step 2]
- Prisma models: [list or "none"]
- Auth: none
- API routes: none

### Infrastructure
- Docker Compose + opt-in PostgreSQL 16 overlay
- CI/CD: GitHub Actions (lint, format, type-check, build, test, E2E)
- Release: CalVer → GHCR Docker image
- Agent: 8 skills, 7 sub-agents, 4 heartbeats, memory protocol

### Community Signal
- Stars: [N], Forks: [N], Watchers: [N]
- Open issues: [N] (list titles + reaction counts)
- Recent fork activity: [list]

### Gaps
1. User accounts + auth (CRITICAL)
2. Fork registry data model (CRITICAL)
3. Docker registry integration (HIGH)
4. Subscription/licensing model (HIGH)
5. Open Harness documentation (HIGH)
6. Testing (MEDIUM — 2 tests total)
7. Observability (MEDIUM — no health endpoint)
8. Agent autonomy gap (MEDIUM — plans but no implementation)

4. Spawn 5 expert sub-agents in ONE message (parallel)

Launch 5 Agent tool calls in a single message for parallel execution:

Expert	Agent file	Perspective	Model
Product	.claude/agents/expert-product.md	Data models, APIs, features	sonnet
Docs	.claude/agents/expert-docs.md	Documentation, fork showcase UX	sonnet
Security	.claude/agents/expert-security.md	Auth, headers, access control	sonnet
Registry	.claude/agents/expert-registry.md	Docker registry, licensing	sonnet
Agent Systems	.claude/agents/expert-agent-systems.md	Agent autonomy, Ralph loop	sonnet

Pass each expert the Current State Briefing + instruction to read their agent definition file and follow its output format.

Experts operate independently — they do NOT see each other's proposals.

5. Strategic Council DRAFT

Launch a single Agent tool call using the council agent (.claude/agents/strategic-council.md):

Pass the council:

• All 5 expert proposals
• The Current State Briefing
• Instruction to query actual signal data (repo stats, issue reactions, fork activity)
• Instruction to produce a DRAFT roadmap (the council's first pass — not final)

Save the council's draft output for the next step.

6. Strategic Critic review

Launch a single Agent tool call using the strategic critic (.claude/agents/strategic-critic.md):

Pass the critic:

• The council's DRAFT roadmap
• The Current State Briefing
• Instruction to query actual signal data independently (verify, don't trust the council)
• Instruction to challenge every "Now" phase assignment, every signal claim, and every complexity estimate

The critic provides adversarial backpressure — its job is to find what's weak in the draft and force revision.

7. Strategic Council FINAL

Launch a second Agent tool call using the council agent (.claude/agents/strategic-council.md):

Pass the council:

• Its own DRAFT roadmap from step 5
• The critic's review from step 6
• Instruction: incorporate valid criticisms and revise, or explicitly defend against each challenge
• Every challenge from the critic MUST be addressed — either the item moves phase, the score changes, or the council explains why the critic is wrong
• The output is the FINAL roadmap — this is what gets published

The council's final output becomes the pinned issue body.

8. Find or create the pinned roadmap issue

Search for existing:

gh api "repos/ryaneggz/open-harness/issues?state=open&labels=roadmap&per_page=10" \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.title == "Product Roadmap")] | first'

If none exists:

gh label create roadmap --repo ryaneggz/open-harness \
  --description "Product roadmap tracking" --color "0075ca" 2>/dev/null || true

gh issue create --repo ryaneggz/open-harness \
  --title "Product Roadmap" --label roadmap \
  --body "<council output>"

Then pin it: gh issue pin <NUMBER> --repo ryaneggz/open-harness

If it already exists, update:

gh issue edit <NUMBER> --repo ryaneggz/open-harness --body "<council output>"

9. Write roadmap data to docs/roadmap.md

Parse the council's FINAL roadmap table and write it to docs/roadmap.md as a single markdown table (one row per roadmap item). If the file does not exist yet, create it with a brief intro section followed by the table.

10. Memory Improvement Protocol

a) Log — append to memory/YYYY-MM-DD/log.md where today = date -u +%Y-%m-%d:

## Strategic Proposal — HH:MM UTC
- **Result**: OP | SKIP
- **Item**: Pinned roadmap issue #<NUMBER>
- **Action**: [roadmap created/updated with N items: X now, Y next, Z later]
- **Duration**: ~Xs
- **Observation**: [one sentence — what signal was strongest, what surprised you]

See context/rules/memory.md for the canonical Memory Improvement Protocol.

b) Report:

• HEARTBEAT_OK (if skipped)
• Full report: pinned issue # + top 3 "Now" items + signal summary

Reference

Key Resources

Resource	Path
Expert: Product	.claude/agents/expert-product.md
Expert: Docs	.claude/agents/expert-docs.md
Expert: Security	.claude/agents/expert-security.md
Expert: Registry	.claude/agents/expert-registry.md
Expert: Agent Systems	.claude/agents/expert-agent-systems.md
Strategic Council	.claude/agents/strategic-council.md
Strategic Critic	.claude/agents/strategic-critic.md
Roadmap data	docs/roadmap.md
Identity	IDENTITY.md
Memory	MEMORY.md
Daily Logs	memory/YYYY-MM-DD/log.md