adversarial-review

Pressure-tests a claim, document, plan, or framework by fanning it out to several INDEPENDENT frontier models from different labs (adversarial mode), or models how a named opponent would attack a position (steel-man mode). Both consume a structured "thesis packet" whose required rails — artifact, precise question, frame, scoped evidence, named gaps, review axes, and an explicit sensitivity declaration — are enforced by a PRECISION GATE that refuses to run on vague input. A Claude model synthesizes the independent critiques into one map; you remain the final judge. USE WHEN you want an artifact stress-tested by diverse models across ANY discipline (strategy, technical design, governance/contracts, intellectual frameworks), or to war-game how an opponent would beat a position.