concept-draft-review

name	concept-draft-review
description	Review upstream ConceptSpec drafts, issue notes promoted toward ConceptSpec, or early design memos before they are treated as stable grounding.

Concept Draft Review

Use this skill when an upstream ConceptSpec draft, issue note promoted toward ConceptSpec, or early design memo needs concept-level review before DFD, Process Map, DDL, RFBA, or implementation work.

This skill reviews upstream drafts. It does not replace existing ConceptSpec, package-spec, or logical-model review skills for approved or structured specs.

Purpose

• Check whether a draft is coherent enough to continue as upstream concept work.
• Find contradictions, missing definitions, boundary risks, relationship gaps, process connection gaps, and implementation leaks.
• Classify unknowns without forcing all draft uncertainty into immediate decisions.

Required Behavior

• Review consistency against existing Concept Specs, Package Scope, DFDs, Process Maps, and relationship metadata when available.
• Treat human-authored drafts and explicit human issue requirements as human-owned.
• Do not finalize domain authority.
• Do not promote a draft concept to authoritative status unless the issue explicitly asks for that.
• Do not create implementation plans or implementation tasks.
• Do not force every unknown into a decision.
• Classify unknowns as blocking, non-blocking, or acceptable.
• Allow draft work to continue with classified unresolved items when the intended process is not blocked.
• Block progress only when the desired process cannot be explained without the missing definition or decision.
• Omit empty output sections.

Review Dimensions

• contradictions
• missing definitions
• responsibility boundary problems
• relationship gaps
• process connection gaps
• implementation detail leaking into ConceptSpec
• unknowns that block the next artifact
• unknowns that can safely wait

Output Shape

Use this structure and omit empty sections:

# Concept Draft Review

## Status
ready-to-propose-promotion | draft-can-continue | needs-revision | needs-human-decision | blocked

## Existing Context Checked
- scope:
- concepts:
- DFDs:
- processes:
- relationship metadata:

## Findings

### Contradictions
- finding:
  why it matters:
  suggested direction:

### Missing Definitions
- finding:
  why it matters:
  suggested direction:

### Boundary Risks
- finding:
  why it matters:
  suggested direction:

### Relationship Gaps
- finding:
  why it matters:
  suggested direction:

### Process Connection Gaps
- finding:
  why it matters:
  suggested direction:

### Implementation Leaks
- finding:
  why it matters:
  suggested direction:

## Unresolved Register

### Decision Required Now
- decision:
  why it blocks:

### Decision Can Wait
- decision:
  why it can wait:
  revisit trigger:

### Acceptable Unknowns
- unknown:
  why it is acceptable:

## Suggested Next Artifact
- none | ConceptSpec update | concept-relationship metadata update | DFD draft | Process Map draft | feature-local spec | scope decision

Not Authority

The review may organize, classify, and propose. It must not approve the draft as authoritative ConceptSpec meaning by itself. ready-to-propose-promotion means ready for human promotion review, not AI approval.