tenant-screening-guide

name	tenant-screening-guide
description	Design a fair, consistent tenant screening process for a rental. Use when asked how to screen tenants, set rental criteria, evaluate rental applicants, or build a tenant screening process. Produces a screening framework — written objective criteria, the application & checks, a consistent evaluation method, and applicant communication — built to be fair and Fair-Housing-compliant. Not legal advice.
homepage	https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/skill/tenant-screening-guide.html
metadata	{"openclaw":{"emoji":"🏠"}}

Tenant Screening Guide Skill

Good tenant screening is consistent and criteria-based: the same written standards applied to every applicant, judged on objective, rental-relevant factors. That protects the landlord (better tenants, fewer problems) and keeps the process fair and legal. This skill builds that framework — the criteria, the checks, and a consistent way to decide — so screening isn't ad-hoc or discriminatory.

Note: this is a process aid, not legal advice. Tenant screening is heavily regulated — Fair Housing laws (protected classes), FCRA/background-check rules, source-of-income and criminal-history limits, and local ordinances vary widely and change. Apply criteria identically to all applicants, and have your criteria and process reviewed by a qualified attorney/property manager for your jurisdiction.

Working from a brief

Given "help me screen tenants for my rental", produce the framework anyway — propose objective, rental-relevant criteria and a consistent process, clearly flagging every legally-sensitive choice (confirm with local law/attorney). Never propose criteria based on protected characteristics; emphasise consistency.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else use labelled defaults):

• The rental — type, rent, and any must-haves (lease length, occupancy limits, pets).
• Your priorities — what a reliable tenant looks like to you, in objective terms (income, history).
• Process — how you accept applications and what checks you can run (credit, background, references).
• Jurisdiction — location (so legal sensitivities can be flagged) — and a reminder to confirm specifics.

Output Format

Tenant Screening Framework: [rental]

1. Written objective criteria — the standards applied to every applicant, e.g.:

• Income — a rent-to-income ratio (e.g. 2.5–3×), flagged as a setting.
• Credit / payment history — a threshold or what you look for (consistency, not just a score).
• Rental history — prior-landlord references, on-time payment, no relevant evictions (within legal limits).
• Verification — employment/income and identity. Each marked (confirm against local law) where sensitive.

2. Application & checks — what to collect (application form, ID, income proof, references) and the checks (credit/background) with required applicant consent (FCRA).

3. Consistent evaluation — apply the criteria the same way to all applicants; ideally first-qualified-first or a scored checklist — documented, so decisions are defensible.

4. Applicant communication — clear criteria up front, and proper adverse-action notice if you decline based on a report (an FCRA requirement) — flagged to confirm.

5. Compliance guardrails — apply identically to everyone; judge only rental-relevant, objective factors; never screen or comment on protected characteristics (race, colour, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, disability, and other protected classes); respect source-of-income and criminal-history limits where they apply.

Add a prominent note to have the framework reviewed by a local attorney/property manager.

Quality Checks

• Criteria are written, objective, and rental-relevant (income, history, verification) — applied to all
• Process emphasises consistency (same standard, same order) and documentation
• Required consent (FCRA) and adverse-action notice are included and flagged
• Compliance guardrails name the protected classes and the don'ts explicitly
• No criterion uses or proxies a protected characteristic
• A clear instruction to confirm with local law / an attorney is included

Anti-Patterns

• Do not screen on or mention protected characteristics (or proxies for them) — it's illegal and unfair
• Do not apply criteria inconsistently between applicants — inconsistency is where discrimination claims live
• Do not run credit/background checks without consent or skip adverse-action notice — FCRA requires them
• Do not present this as legal advice or jurisdiction-specific compliance — flag for an attorney
• Do not use blanket criminal-history bans where the law restricts them — flag to confirm locally

Based On

Fair-housing & tenant-screening practice — written objective criteria applied consistently, FCRA-compliant checks and notices, and protected-class safeguards (jurisdiction review required).