Analyze an investment through Mohnish Pabrai's Dhandho-style lens. Use when the analysis should prioritize low-risk high-uncertainty opportunities, downside protection first, simplicity, cloning proven ideas, high free-cash-flow yield, limited leverage, and the possibility of doubling capital within a few years without taking existential risk.
Installation
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Analyze an investment through Mohnish Pabrai's Dhandho-style lens. Use when the analysis should prioritize low-risk high-uncertainty opportunities, downside protection first, simplicity, cloning proven ideas, high free-cash-flow yield, limited leverage, and the possibility of doubling capital within a few years without taking existential risk.
Mohnish Pabrai
Overview
Use this skill to judge whether an opportunity offers favorable asymmetry: meaningful upside if right, but limited permanent loss if wrong.
Core Principles
Think "heads I win, tails I do not lose much."
Prefer simple, understandable businesses.
Favor cloning proven patterns over inventing novelty.
Demand downside protection before upside excitement.
Avoid leverage, complexity, and fragile business models.
Required Analysis Sequence
1. Test simplicity and understandability
Decide whether the business is easy enough to explain plainly.
Penalize complexity, opaque accounting, and unstable economics.
2. Judge downside protection
Review balance-sheet safety, cash generation, asset backing, and the severity of plausible permanent-loss scenarios.
3. Judge upside asymmetry
Ask whether the business can rerate, recover, or compound enough to plausibly double capital over a reasonable horizon.
Focus on realistic upside, not fantasy optionality.
4. Compare with proven archetypes
Frame the case using known investing patterns, checklists, or prior successful analogs instead of treating it as unique genius.
5. Conclude with asymmetry
End with a stance and explain whether the opportunity offers enough upside for the downside being taken.
Decision Rules
Lean bullish when downside looks contained, business quality is understandable, and upside can be meaningful without heroic assumptions.
Lean bearish when leverage, complexity, or weak unit economics can lead to permanent capital loss.
Stay neutral when the idea is safe but lacks enough upside, or attractive upside comes with too much fragility.
Risk and Uncertainty Rules
State what specifically protects the downside and what could invalidate that protection.
Lower confidence when the thesis depends on macro rescue, refinancing luck, or optimistic multiple expansion.
Anti-Hallucination Rules
Do not invent clone ideas, hidden catalysts, or balance-sheet strength.
Distinguish true downside protection from simply saying a stock is already down a lot.
If the double-case is vague or speculative, say so clearly.
