Builds vendor-agnostic detection rules using the Sigma rule format for threat detection across SIEM platforms including Splunk, Elastic, and Microsoft Sentinel. Use when creating portable detection logic from threat intelligence, mapping rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or converting community Sigma rules into platform-specific queries using sigmac or pySigma backends.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Builds vendor-agnostic detection rules using the Sigma rule format for threat detection across SIEM platforms including Splunk, Elastic, and Microsoft Sentinel. Use when creating portable detection logic from threat intelligence, mapping rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or converting community Sigma rules into platform-specific queries using sigmac or pySigma backends.
SOC engineers need to create detection rules portable across multiple SIEM platforms
Threat intelligence reports describe TTPs requiring new detection coverage
Existing vendor-specific rules need standardization into a shareable format
The team adopts Sigma as a detection-as-code standard in CI/CD pipelines
Do not use for real-time streaming detection (Sigma is for batch/scheduled searches) or when the target SIEM has native detection features that Sigma cannot express (e.g., Splunk RBA risk scoring).
Prerequisites
Python 3.8+ with pySigma and appropriate backend (pySigma-backend-splunk, pySigma-backend-elasticsearch, pySigma-backend-microsoft365defender)
from sigma.rule import SigmaRule
from sigma.validators.core import SigmaValidator
rule = SigmaRule.from_yaml(open("rule.yml").read())
validator = SigmaValidator()
issues = validator.validate_rule(rule)
for issue in issues:
print(f"{issue.severity}: {issue.message}")
Step 3: Convert to Target SIEM Query
Convert to Splunk SPL:
from sigma.rule import SigmaRule
from sigma.backends.splunk import SplunkBackend
from sigma.pipelines.splunk import splunk_windows_pipeline
pipeline = splunk_windows_pipeline()
backend = SplunkBackend(pipeline)
rule = SigmaRule.from_yaml(open("rule.yml").read())
splunk_query = backend.convert_rule(rule)
print(splunk_query[0])
Output:
TargetImage="*\\lsass.exe" (GrantedAccess="*0x1010*" OR GrantedAccess="*0x1038*"
OR GrantedAccess="*0x1fffff*" OR GrantedAccess="*0x40*")
NOT (SourceImage="*\\svchost.exe") NOT (SourceImage="*\\csrss.exe")
NOT (SourceImage="*\\wininit.exe")
Convert to Elastic Query (Lucene):
from sigma.backends.elasticsearch import LuceneBackend
from sigma.pipelines.elasticsearch import ecs_windows_pipeline
pipeline = ecs_windows_pipeline()
backend = LuceneBackend(pipeline)
elastic_query = backend.convert_rule(rule)
print(elastic_query[0])
Track detection coverage using the ATT&CK Navigator:
import json
# Generate ATT&CK Navigator layer from Sigma rules
layer = {
"name": "SOC Detection Coverage",
"versions": {"attack": "14", "navigator": "4.9", "layer": "4.5"},
"domain": "enterprise-attack",
"techniques": []
}
# Parse Sigma rules directory for technique tagsimport os
from sigma.rule import SigmaRule
for root, dirs, files in os.walk("sigma/rules/windows/"):
for f in files:
if f.endswith(".yml"):
rule = SigmaRule.from_yaml(open(os.path.join(root, f)).read())
for tag in rule.tags:
ifstr(tag).startswith("attack.t"):
technique_id = str(tag).replace("attack.", "").upper()
layer["techniques"].append({
"techniqueID": technique_id,
"color": "#31a354",
"score": 1
})
withopen("coverage_layer.json", "w") as f:
json.dump(layer, f, indent=2)
Step 5: Test Rule Against Sample Data
Create test data and validate the rule catches the expected events:
# Use sigma test framework
sigma test rule.yml --target splunk --pipeline splunk_windows
# Or manually test in Splunk with sample data# Upload Sysmon process_access log with known Mimikatz signature
Validate false positive rate by running against 7 days of production data in a non-alerting saved search.
Step 6: Deploy to Production SIEM
Deploy the converted query as a scheduled search or correlation rule:
Splunk ES Correlation Search:
| tstats summariesonly=true count from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
where Processes.process_name="*\\lsass.exe"
by Processes.src, Processes.user, Processes.process_name, Processes.parent_process_name
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| where count > 0
Elastic Security Rule (TOML format):
[rule]name = "LSASS Memory Access - Credential Dumping"description = "Detects suspicious access to LSASS process memory"risk_score = 73severity = "high"type = "eql"query = '''
process where event.action == "access" and
process.name == "lsass.exe" and
not process.executable : ("*\\svchost.exe", "*\\csrss.exe")
'''[rule.threat]framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"[[rule.threat.technique]]id = "T1003"name = "OS Credential Dumping"
