Baseline the EFI System Partition and hunt malicious EFI binaries such as ESPecter, BlackLotus, Bootkitty, and Glupteba by mounting the ESP, hashing and verifying boot loaders, scanning with YARA, and flagging anomalous non-EFI files or out-of-band bootloader changes. Use during proactive threat hunts for firmware/bootkit persistence (MITRE ATT&CK T1542.003) or when investigating suspected UEFI-level compromise that survives OS reinstall.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Baseline the EFI System Partition and hunt malicious EFI binaries such as ESPecter, BlackLotus, Bootkitty, and Glupteba by mounting the ESP, hashing and verifying boot loaders, scanning with YARA, and flagging anomalous non-EFI files or out-of-band bootloader changes. Use during proactive threat hunts for firmware/bootkit persistence (MITRE ATT&CK T1542.003) or when investigating suspected UEFI-level compromise that survives OS reinstall.
The EFI System Partition (ESP) is a small FAT32-formatted partition that the platform firmware reads at power-on to locate and execute the operating system's boot loader. Because it executes before the operating system, kernel, and any EDR agent, the ESP is one of the most coveted persistence locations for advanced adversaries. UEFI bootkits that live on the ESP survive OS reinstallation, disk reformatting of the OS partition, and most endpoint defenses.
This skill follows the detection research published by Eclypsium ("Enhanced Threat Detection: Bootloaders, Bootkits, and Secure Boot", and the Bootkitty and Glupteba analyses) and aligns with the ESP-hunting methodology Rapid7 documented for Velociraptor (Windows.Forensics.UEFI, Windows.Detection.Yara.UEFI). The threat context is concrete and current:
ESPecter (ESET, 2021) — a UEFI bootkit that persists on the ESP as a patched Windows Boot Manager (bootmgfw.efi) plus malicious kernel-mode drivers. It marked the move of UEFI threats from SPI flash to the ESP, where they are far easier to deploy.
BlackLotus (2023) — the first in-the-wild UEFI bootkit able to bypass Secure Boot on fully patched Windows 11 by exploiting CVE-2022-21894 ("baton drop") and staging a vulnerable signed bootmgfw.efi on the ESP.
Bootkitty (2024) — the first UEFI bootkit targeting Linux, dropped onto the ESP.
Glupteba — commodity malware whose UEFI variant replaces software on the EFI partition.
The core detection insight from Eclypsium and Rapid7 is that the bootloader normally changes only during a vendor or OS update; an out-of-band change to ESP binaries, an unsigned or untrusted-signed boot loader, or any file in the ESP root that is not under the EFI/ directory is a high-fidelity indicator of compromise. This skill builds that baseline and hunts deviations from it.
When to Use
During proactive threat hunts for firmware/bootkit persistence (MITRE ATT&CK T1542.003 — Pre-OS Boot: Bootkit)
After an incident where an adversary achieved SYSTEM/root and may have established below-OS persistence
When validating Secure Boot posture across a fleet and confirming boot-chain integrity
As a periodic integrity check, comparing the current ESP contents against a trusted golden baseline
When triaging hosts that show measured-boot (TPM PCR) mismatches
Prerequisites
Administrative/root access to the target host (mounting and reading the ESP requires elevation)
Linux analysis tooling — install on Debian/Ubuntu:
A trusted golden baseline of EFI binary hashes for the OS/vendor versions in scope (build it once on a known-clean, freshly imaged host)
For Windows targets: WinPE or a forensic boot environment, or Velociraptor with the Windows.Forensics.UEFI artifact
Objectives
Mount and enumerate the ESP read-only without altering evidence
Inventory every EFI binary and compute cryptographic hashes
Verify Secure Boot signatures on each boot loader against trusted keys
Compare contents against a golden baseline to surface out-of-band changes
YARA-scan ESP binaries for known bootkit signatures
Flag anomalies: files outside EFI/, unsigned loaders, modified bootmgfw.efi/grubx64.efi, and tampered boot entries
Confirm measured-boot (TPM PCR 0/2/4) integrity where TPM is present
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
ID
Name
Relevance
T1542.003
Pre-OS Boot: Bootkit
Adversaries place malicious boot loaders on the ESP to execute before the OS and EDR, achieving stealthy, resilient persistence. This skill hunts exactly that artifact.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify and mount the ESP read-only
The ESP is a FAT32 partition, usually flagged EF00 (GPT) or esp,boot. Locate it and mount read-only to preserve evidence.
# Identify the ESP (type code EF00 / "EFI System")sudo lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,PARTTYPENAME,MOUNTPOINT
sudo fdisk -l | grep -i "EFI System"# Mount the ESP read-only (replace /dev/sda1 with the identified partition)sudomkdir -p /mnt/esp
sudo mount -o ro,umask=077 /dev/sda1 /mnt/esp
# Confirm the canonical layout: EFI/ should be the only top-level dirls -la /mnt/esp
Per Rapid7/Velociraptor guidance, the ESP root should contain only the EFI/ directory (and possibly a vendor System Volume Information). Anything else is suspicious.
# Any path in the ESP root NOT under EFI/ is a red flag
find /mnt/esp -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 ! -name 'EFI' ! -iname 'System Volume Information'# Hunt for boot binaries dropped outside expected vendor folders
find /mnt/esp -type f \( -iname '*.efi' -o -iname '*.sys' -o -iname '*.dll' \) -printf'%p\t%s bytes\t%TY-%Tm-%Td\n'
Step 3: Inventory and hash every EFI binary
Compute SHA-256 of all boot binaries for baseline comparison and threat-intel lookup.
# Recursively hash all EFI/PE binaries on the ESP
find /mnt/esp -type f \( -iname '*.efi' -o -iname '*.sys' \) -print0 \
| xargs -0 sha256sum | tee /tmp/esp_hashes.txt
# Quick triage on the primary loaderssha256sum /mnt/esp/EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi 2>/dev/null
sha256sum /mnt/esp/EFI/Boot/bootx64.efi 2>/dev/null
sha256sum /mnt/esp/EFI/*/grubx64.efi /mnt/esp/EFI/*/shimx64.efi 2>/dev/null
Submit unknown hashes to VirusTotal / the LOLDrivers and Binarly catalogs to identify known-vulnerable or malicious loaders (e.g., the BlackLotus-abused bootmgfw.efi builds).
Step 4: Verify Secure Boot signatures on each loader
A legitimate loader is signed by Microsoft UEFI CA (Windows/shim) or the distro vendor. Use sbverify to list/verify signatures and pesign for the certificate chain.
# List embedded signatures on a loader
sbverify --list /mnt/esp/EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
# Verify against the platform's db certificate (export it first)sudo efi-readvar -v db -o /tmp/db.esl # dump Secure Boot db
sbverify --cert /path/to/MicrosoftUEFICA.pem /mnt/esp/EFI/Boot/bootx64.efi
# Inspect the PE certificate chain
pesign -S -i /mnt/esp/EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
An unsigned loader, a loader signed by an unexpected/self-signed certificate, or a known-vulnerable signed binary staged by an attacker (BlackLotus technique) is a confirmed finding.
Step 5: Compare against the golden baseline
Diff the live ESP hash inventory against a trusted baseline captured from a clean image of the same OS/vendor build.
# Sort both inventories on the hash column and diff
awk '{print $1}' /tmp/esp_hashes.txt | sort > /tmp/live.sha256
sort baseline_esp_hashes.sha256 > /tmp/base.sha256
# Hashes present live but absent from the baseline = unexpected/new binariescomm -23 /tmp/live.sha256 /tmp/base.sha256
Because the bootloader changes only during legitimate updates, any new hash that does not correspond to a known patch is an actionable lead.
Step 6: YARA-scan ESP binaries for bootkit signatures
Run YARA rules for known bootkits (ESPecter, BlackLotus, Bootkitty, CosmicStrand) across the ESP — the same approach as Velociraptor's Windows.Detection.Yara.UEFI.
# Scan all ESP files recursively with a bootkit ruleset
yara -r -w bootkit_rules.yar /mnt/esp/
# Example: scan only the binaries collected in Step 3
yara -r bootkit_rules.yar /mnt/esp/EFI/
Source rules from the YARA-Rules project, Eclypsium/Binarly publications, and ESET's bootkit reports.
Step 7: Inspect and validate UEFI boot entries
ESPecter-class bootkits manipulate the boot order/entries. Enumerate NVRAM boot variables and confirm each points to an expected, signed loader.
# List boot entries and the current order (Bootkitty/ESPecter tamper here)sudo efibootmgr -v
# Confirm Secure Boot is enabled and look for revoked hashes in dbx
mokutil --sb-state
sudo efi-readvar -v dbx -o /tmp/dbx.esl
A boot entry referencing a file outside \EFI\ or a loader whose hash appears in dbx (revoked) but is still present indicates tampering.
Step 8: Validate measured boot against TPM PCRs (where available)
Measured boot records the boot-chain components into TPM PCRs (notably PCR 0, 2, 4). A bootkit that alters loaders changes these measurements.
# Read PCRs that cover firmware and the boot loadersudo tpm2_pcrread sha256:0,2,4,7
# Parse the TCG event log to see what was measured into each PCRsudo tpm2_eventlog /sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements
Compare measured values against the host's known-good attestation baseline; an unexplained PCR 4 change correlates with a modified boot loader.
Step 9: Document findings and preserve evidence
# Make a forensic image of the ESP for offline analysis before remediationsudoddif=/dev/sda1 of=/evidence/esp_$(hostname)_$(date +%F).img bs=4M conv=noerror,syncsha256sum /evidence/esp_*.img > /evidence/esp_image.sha256
sudo umount /mnt/esp
Record every anomalous binary (path, hash, signature status, baseline diff result, YARA match) in the case file before any cleanup.
Tools and Resources
Tool
Purpose
Source
sbsigntool (sbverify)
List/verify Secure Boot signatures on EFI binaries
