Implement cloud DLP using Amazon Macie, Google Cloud DLP API, Microsoft Purview, Azure Information Protection, and Nightfall AI to discover, classify, label, de-identify, and protect sensitive data (PII, PHI, financial data) across cloud storage, databases, and pipelines. Use for GDPR/HIPAA/PCI DSS data-discovery, cloud data governance, or CI/CD DLP scanning; not for endpoint, email, or network-level DLP.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Implement cloud DLP using Amazon Macie, Google Cloud DLP API, Microsoft Purview, Azure Information Protection, and Nightfall AI to discover, classify, label, de-identify, and protect sensitive data (PII, PHI, financial data) across cloud storage, databases, and pipelines. Use for GDPR/HIPAA/PCI DSS data-discovery, cloud data governance, or CI/CD DLP scanning; not for endpoint, email, or network-level DLP.
When compliance frameworks (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS) require automated sensitive data discovery and protection
When building data governance programs that classify and label data across cloud storage
When implementing data loss prevention controls for cloud-based data pipelines
When auditing cloud environments for unprotected sensitive data (PII, PHI, financial data)
When integrating DLP scanning into CI/CD pipelines to prevent sensitive data from reaching production
Do not use for endpoint DLP (use Microsoft Purview or Symantec DLP agents), for email DLP (use Microsoft 365 DLP or Google Workspace DLP), or for network-level data exfiltration prevention (use VPC endpoint policies and network firewalls).
Prerequisites
Amazon Macie enabled with appropriate S3 bucket permissions
Google Cloud DLP API enabled (gcloud services enable dlp.googleapis.com)
Azure Information Protection or Microsoft Purview configured
IAM permissions for DLP service administration and data access
Knowledge of data sensitivity categories relevant to the organization (PII, PHI, PCI, proprietary)
Workflow
Step 1: Deploy Amazon Macie for S3 Data Discovery
Enable Macie and configure automated sensitive data discovery jobs for S3 buckets.
Set up sensitivity labels and DLP policies in Microsoft Purview for Azure resources.
# Connect to Microsoft Purview compliance
Connect-IPPSSession
# Create sensitivity labels
New-Label -DisplayName "Confidential - PII" \
-Name "Confidential-PII" \
-Tooltip "Contains personally identifiable information" \
-ContentType "File, Email"
New-Label -DisplayName "Highly Confidential - Financial" \
-Name "HighlyConfidential-Financial" \
-Tooltip "Contains financial data subject to PCI DSS" \
-ContentType "File, Email"
# Create auto-labeling policy for Azure Storage
New-AutoSensitivityLabelPolicy -Name "Auto-Label-PII" \
-ExchangeLocation All \
-SharePointLocation All \
-OneDriveLocation All \
-Mode Enable
New-AutoSensitivityLabelRule -Policy "Auto-Label-PII" \
-Name "Detect-SSN" \
-ContentContainsSensitiveInformation @{
Name = "U.S. Social Security Number (SSN)";
MinCount = 1;
MinConfidence = 85
} \
-ApplySensitivityLabel "Confidential-PII"
# Azure: Configure DLP policy for Storage accounts
az security assessment create \
--name "storage-sensitive-data" \
--assessed-resource-type "Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts"# Enable Microsoft Defender for Storage with sensitive data threat detection
az security pricing create --name StorageAccounts --tier standard \
--subplan DefenderForStorageV2 \
--extensions '[{"name":"SensitiveDataDiscovery","isEnabled":"True"}]'
Step 5: Integrate DLP into Data Pipelines
Add DLP scanning to ETL and data pipeline workflows to prevent sensitive data leakage.
# pipeline_dlp_gate.py - DLP gate for data pipelinesimport boto3
import json
macie_client = boto3.client('macie2')
s3_client = boto3.client('s3')
defscan_pipeline_output(bucket, prefix):
"""Scan pipeline output data for sensitive content before promotion."""
job_response = macie_client.create_classification_job(
jobType='ONE_TIME',
name=f'pipeline-scan-{prefix}',
s3JobDefinition={
'bucketDefinitions': [{
'accountId': boto3.client('sts').get_caller_identity()['Account'],
'buckets': [bucket]
}],
'scoping': {
'includes': {
'and': [{
'simpleScopeTerm': {
'key': 'OBJECT_KEY',
'comparator': 'STARTS_WITH',
'values': [prefix]
}
}]
}
}
},
managedDataIdentifierSelector='ALL'
)
return job_response['jobId']
defcheck_scan_results(job_id):
"""Check if DLP scan found sensitive data."""
response = macie_client.list_findings(
findingCriteria={
'criterion': {
'classificationDetails.jobId': {'eq': [job_id]},
'severity.description': {'eq': ['High', 'Critical']}
}
}
)
returnlen(response.get('findingIds', [])) > 0defgate_decision(bucket, prefix):
"""DLP gate: block pipeline if sensitive data found."""
job_id = scan_pipeline_output(bucket, prefix)
has_sensitive_data = check_scan_results(job_id)
if has_sensitive_data:
return {
'decision': 'BLOCK',
'reason': 'Sensitive data detected in pipeline output',
'action': 'Apply de-identification before promoting to production'
}
return {'decision': 'ALLOW', 'reason': 'No sensitive data detected'}
Step 6: Monitor DLP Findings and Generate Reports
Aggregate DLP findings across cloud providers and generate compliance reports.
# Macie: Get finding statistics
aws macie2 get-finding-statistics \
--group-by "severity.description" \
--finding-criteria '{"criterion":{"category":{"eq":["CLASSIFICATION"]}}}'# Macie: List findings by sensitivity type
aws macie2 list-findings \
--finding-criteria '{
"criterion": {
"classificationDetails.result.sensitiveData.category": {"eq": ["PERSONAL_INFORMATION"]},
"severity.description": {"eq": ["High"]}
}
}' \
--sort-criteria '{"attributeName": "updatedAt", "orderBy": "DESC"}'# GCP DLP: List job results
gcloud dlp jobs list --project=PROJECT_ID --filter="state=DONE" \
--format="table(name, createTime, inspectDetails.result.processedBytes, inspectDetails.result.totalEstimatedTransformations)"# Export Macie findings to S3 for compliance reporting
aws macie2 create-findings-report \
--finding-criteria '{"criterion":{"category":{"eq":["CLASSIFICATION"]}}}' \
--sort-criteria '{"attributeName":"severity.score","orderBy":"DESC"}'
Key Concepts
Term
Definition
Data Loss Prevention
Security controls and technologies that detect and prevent unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data from cloud environments
Amazon Macie
AWS service using machine learning to discover, classify, and protect sensitive data stored in S3 buckets
Google Cloud DLP
GCP API for inspecting, classifying, and de-identifying sensitive data across Cloud Storage, BigQuery, and Datastore
Data De-identification
Transforming sensitive data using masking, tokenization, encryption, or redaction to remove identifying characteristics while preserving utility
Sensitivity Label
Classification tag applied to data (Confidential, Highly Confidential) that triggers DLP policy enforcement and access controls
Custom Data Identifier
Organization-specific pattern (regex or keyword) added to DLP services to detect proprietary sensitive data formats
Tools & Systems
Amazon Macie: ML-powered sensitive data discovery and classification for S3 with automated finding generation
Google Cloud DLP API: Programmable API for inspecting, classifying, de-identifying, and redacting sensitive data
Microsoft Purview: Data governance platform with sensitivity labeling, auto-classification, and DLP policy enforcement
Azure Information Protection: Data classification and labeling service integrated with Microsoft 365 and Azure storage
Nightfall AI: Third-party cloud DLP tool supporting scanning across SaaS applications and cloud infrastructure
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Discovering PII in an Unprotected S3 Data Lake
Context: A compliance audit reveals that the analytics team's S3 data lake contains customer PII (names, emails, SSNs) in CSV files without encryption or access controls. The organization must classify all data and implement DLP controls.
Approach:
Enable Macie and create a one-time classification job against the data lake bucket
Review Macie findings to identify which objects contain PII and what types
Create custom data identifiers for organization-specific formats (employee IDs, account numbers)
Implement a weekly scheduled Macie job for ongoing discovery
Build a data pipeline gate that scans new data before promotion to the data lake
Apply de-identification transforms (masking SSNs, tokenizing emails) for analytics use cases
Configure S3 bucket policies to restrict access to classified data to authorized roles only
Pitfalls: Macie charges per GB scanned. Large data lakes can generate significant costs. Use scoping rules to focus on high-risk object types (CSV, JSON, Parquet) and exclude known-safe formats (compressed archives, binary files). De-identification must preserve data utility for analytics while removing re-identification risk.
Output Format
Cloud DLP Compliance Report
==============================
Organization: Acme Corp
Scan Period: 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-23
Environments: AWS (12 buckets), GCP (3 datasets), Azure (5 storage accounts)
DATA DISCOVERY SUMMARY:
Total objects/records scanned: 2,847,000
Objects with sensitive data: 45,200 (1.6%)
Unique sensitivity categories: 8
SENSITIVE DATA FINDINGS:
PII (names, emails, phone): 23,400 objects
Financial (credit cards, bank): 8,700 objects
Health (PHI, medical records): 3,200 objects
Credentials (API keys, tokens): 1,400 objects
Government ID (SSN, passport): 5,800 objects
Custom (employee ID, account): 2,700 objects
FINDINGS BY SEVERITY:
Critical: 1,400 (exposed credentials)
High: 14,200 (unprotected PII/PHI)
Medium: 18,600 (standard PII)
Low: 11,000 (non-sensitive patterns)
PROTECTION STATUS:
Data with encryption at rest: 78%
Data with access controls: 65%
Data with sensitivity labels: 12%
Pipeline data with DLP gates: 30%
REMEDIATION ACTIONS:
Objects quarantined: 1,400
De-identification applied: 8,200
Access controls tightened: 14,200
Sensitivity labels applied: 45,200
