Uses Microsoft RESTler to perform stateful REST API fuzzing: compiles an OpenAPI/Swagger spec into a RESTler grammar, configures authentication, and runs test/fuzz-lean/fuzz modes that generate request sequences exercising producer-consumer dependencies, then flags 500 errors, auth bypasses, resource leaks, and injection bugs. Use when fuzzing REST APIs for stateful bugs or running RESTler-based automated API security testing.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Uses Microsoft RESTler to perform stateful REST API fuzzing: compiles an OpenAPI/Swagger spec into a RESTler grammar, configures authentication, and runs test/fuzz-lean/fuzz modes that generate request sequences exercising producer-consumer dependencies, then flags 500 errors, auth bypasses, resource leaks, and injection bugs. Use when fuzzing REST APIs for stateful bugs or running RESTler-based automated API security testing.
Performing automated security testing of REST APIs using their OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
Discovering bugs that only manifest through specific sequences of API calls (stateful testing)
Finding 500 Internal Server Error responses that indicate unhandled exceptions or crash conditions
Testing API input validation by fuzzing parameters with malformed, boundary, and injection payloads
Running continuous security regression testing in CI/CD pipelines for API changes
Do not use against production environments without explicit authorization and monitoring. RESTler creates and deletes resources aggressively during fuzzing.
Prerequisites
Written authorization specifying the target API and acceptable testing scope
OpenAPI/Swagger specification (v2 or v3) for the target API
API authentication credentials (tokens, API keys, or OAuth credentials)
Isolated test/staging environment (RESTler can create thousands of resources per hour)
Workflow
Step 1: RESTler Installation and Setup
# Clone and build RESTler
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer.git
cd restler-fuzzer
# Build RESTler
python3 ./build-restler.py --dest_dir /opt/restler
# Verify installation
/opt/restler/restler/Restler --help# Alternative: Use pre-built release# Download from https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer/releases
Step 2: Compile the API Specification
# Compile the OpenAPI spec into a RESTler fuzzing grammar
/opt/restler/restler/Restler compile \
--api_spec /path/to/openapi.yaml
# Output directory structure:# Compile/# grammar.py - Generated fuzzing grammar# grammar.json - Grammar in JSON format# dict.json - Custom dictionary for fuzzing values# engine_settings.json - Engine configuration
# config.json - Compilation config
Custom dictionary for targeted fuzzing (dict.json):
{"restler_fuzzable_string":["fuzzstring","' OR '1'='1","\" OR \"1\"=\"1","<script>alert(1)</script>","../../../etc/passwd","${7*7}","{{7*7}}","a]UNION SELECT 1,2,3--","\"; cat /etc/passwd; echo \"","AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"],"restler_fuzzable_int":["0","-1","999999999","2147483647","-2147483648"],"restler_fuzzable_bool":["true","false","null","1","0"],"restler_fuzzable_datetime":["2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","0000-00-00T00:00:00Z","9999-12-31T23:59:59Z","invalid-date"],"restler_fuzzable_uuid4":["00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000","aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa"],"restler_custom_payload":{"/users/{userId}":["1","0","-1","admin","' OR 1=1--"],"/orders/{orderId}":["1","0","999999999"]}}
# Test mode: Quick validation that all endpoints are reachable
/opt/restler/restler/Restler test \
--grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
--no_ssl \
--target_ip target-api.example.com \
--target_port 443
# Review test resultscat Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json
# Parse test resultsimport json
withopen("Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json") as f:
summary = json.load(f)
print("Test Mode Summary:")
print(f" Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}")
print(f" Successful (2xx): {summary.get('num_fully_valid', 0)}")
print(f" Client errors (4xx): {summary.get('num_invalid', 0)}")
print(f" Server errors (5xx): {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}")
# Identify uncovered endpoints
covered = summary.get('covered_endpoints', [])
total = summary.get('total_endpoints', [])
uncovered = set(total) - set(covered)
if uncovered:
print(f"\nUncovered endpoints ({len(uncovered)}):")
for ep in uncovered:
print(f" - {ep}")
Step 5: Run Fuzz-Lean Mode
# Fuzz-lean: One pass through all endpoints with security checkers enabled
/opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz-lean \
--grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
--target_ip target-api.example.com \
--target_port 443 \
--time_budget 1 # 1 hour max# Checkers automatically enabled in fuzz-lean:# - UseAfterFree: Tests accessing resources after deletion# - NamespaceRule: Tests accessing resources across namespaces/tenants# - ResourceHierarchy: Tests child resources with wrong parent IDs# - LeakageRule: Tests for information disclosure in error responses# - InvalidDynamicObject: Tests with malformed dynamic object IDs
Step 6: Run Full Fuzzing Mode
# Full fuzz mode: Extended fuzzing for comprehensive coverage
/opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz \
--grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
--target_ip target-api.example.com \
--target_port 443 \
--time_budget 4 \
--enable_checkers UseAfterFree NamespaceRule ResourceHierarchy LeakageRule InvalidDynamicObject PayloadBody
# Analyze fuzzing results
python3 <<'EOF'
import json
import os
results_dir = "Fuzz/ResponseBuckets"
bugs_dir = "Fuzz/bug_buckets"# Parse bug bucketsif os.path.exists(bugs_dir):
for bug_file in os.listdir(bugs_dir):
if bug_file.endswith(".txt"):
with open(os.path.join(bugs_dir, bug_file)) as f:
content = f.read()
print(f"\n=== Bug: {bug_file} ===")
print(content[:500])
# Parse response summary
summary_file = os.path.join(results_dir, "runSummary.json")
if os.path.exists(summary_file):
with open(summary_file) as f:
summary = json.load(f)
print(f"\nFuzz Summary:")
print(f" Duration: {summary.get('time_budget_hours', 0)} hours")
print(f" Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}")
print(f" Bugs found: {summary.get('num_bugs', 0)}")
print(f" 500 errors: {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}")
EOF
Key Concepts
Term
Definition
Stateful Fuzzing
API fuzzing that maintains state across requests by using responses from earlier requests as inputs to later ones, enabling testing of multi-step workflows
Producer-Consumer Dependencies
RESTler's inference that a value produced by one API call (e.g., a created resource ID) should be consumed by a subsequent call
Fuzzing Grammar
Compiled representation of the API specification that defines how to generate valid and invalid requests for each endpoint
Checker
RESTler security rule that tests for specific vulnerability patterns like use-after-free, namespace isolation, or information leakage
Bug Bucket
RESTler's categorization of discovered bugs by type and endpoint, grouping similar failures for efficient triage
Garbage Collection
RESTler's periodic cleanup of resources created during fuzzing to prevent resource exhaustion on the target system
Tools & Systems
RESTler: Microsoft Research's stateful REST API fuzzing tool that compiles OpenAPI specs into fuzzing grammars
Schemathesis: Property-based API testing tool that generates test cases from OpenAPI/GraphQL schemas
Dredd: API testing tool that validates API implementations against OpenAPI/API Blueprint documentation
Fuzz-lightyear: Yelp's stateless API fuzzer focused on finding authentication and authorization vulnerabilities
API Fuzzer: OWASP tool for API endpoint fuzzing with customizable payload dictionaries
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Microservice API Fuzzing Campaign
Context: A fintech company has 12 microservice APIs with OpenAPI specifications. Before a major release, the security team runs RESTler fuzzing against each service in the staging environment to catch bugs.
Approach:
Collect OpenAPI specs for all 12 services and compile each into a RESTler grammar
Configure authentication for each service with service-specific credentials
Run test mode on each service to validate endpoint reachability and fix grammar issues
Run fuzz-lean mode (1 hour per service) to identify quick wins
Find 23 bugs in fuzz-lean mode: 8 unhandled 500 errors, 5 use-after-free patterns, 4 namespace isolation failures, 6 information leakage in error responses
Run full fuzz mode (4 hours per service) on the 5 services with the most bugs
Discover 47 additional bugs including a critical authentication bypass where deleting a user and reusing their token still allows access
Generate bug reports and track remediation through JIRA integration
Pitfalls:
Running RESTler against production without understanding that it creates and deletes thousands of resources
Not configuring authentication correctly, causing RESTler to only test unauthenticated access
Using the default dictionary without adding application-specific injection payloads
Not setting a time budget, allowing RESTler to run indefinitely
Ignoring the compilation warnings that indicate endpoints RESTler cannot reach due to dependency issues
Output Format
## RESTler API Fuzzing Report
**Target**: User Service API (staging.example.com)
**Specification**: OpenAPI 3.0 (42 endpoints)
**Duration**: 4 hours (full fuzz mode)
**Total Requests**: 145,832
### Bug Summary
| Category | Count | Severity |
|----------|-------|----------|
| 500 Internal Server Error | 12 | High |
| Use After Free | 3 | Critical |
| Namespace Rule Violation | 5 | Critical |
| Information Leakage | 8 | Medium |
| Resource Leak | 4 | Low |
### Critical Findings
**1. Use-After-Free: Deleted user token still valid**
- Sequence: POST /users -> DELETE /users/{id} -> GET /users/{id}
- After deleting user, GET with the deleted user's token returns 200
- Impact: Deleted accounts can still access the API
**2. Namespace Violation: Cross-tenant data access**
- Sequence: POST /users (tenant A) -> GET /users/{id} (tenant B token)
- User created by tenant A is accessible with tenant B's credentials
- Impact: Multi-tenant isolation breach
**3. 500 Error: Unhandled integer overflow**
- Request: POST /orders {"quantity": 2147483648}
- Response: 500 Internal Server Error with stack trace
- Impact: DoS potential, information disclosure via stack trace
### Coverage
- Endpoints covered: 38/42 (90.5%)
- Uncovered: POST /admin/migrate, DELETE /admin/cache,
PUT /config/advanced, POST /webhooks/test
