| name | nette-architecture |
| description | Invoke before designing presenters, modules, or application structure in web application. Use when asking about directory structure (app/ folder organization), presenter organization (modules, Admin/Front/Api, BasePresenter), domain-driven placement (Core/ vs Model/), component and factory placement, presenter lifecycle (action/render/template), CLI tasks, Accessory placement, project skeleton, or refactoring architecture. Also trigger when starting a new Nette project. |
For new projects, see the project skeleton reference.
For the #[Requires] attribute (HTTP method/AJAX restrictions on actions), see the reference.
Application Architecture
Presenter Lifecycle
Understanding the request flow is essential for placing logic correctly:
startup() – runs first, use for access checks and early redirects
action<Name>() – processes the request (data writes, redirects). Signals (handle<Name>()) also run in this phase.
beforeRender() – runs before every render, use for shared template variables
render<Name>() – prepares data for the template (read-only, no redirects)
- Template – renders the HTML output
The key insight: actions and signals do things (write, redirect), renders prepare views (read). Mixing these responsibilities leads to redirect-after-render bugs and untestable presenters.
Directory Structure
The application follows domain-driven organization. The reason: when code is grouped by domain (products, orders, customers), related files are close together and changes to one feature don't scatter across multiple directories.
- App: The main application namespace (
App\)
- Bootstrap: Application initialization and configuration
- Core: Infrastructure concerns (routing, integrations)
- Entity: Database entities (see nette-database skill for entity design)
- Model: Business logic services organized by domain
- Presentation: UI layer organized by modules
- Tasks: Command-line executable tasks
Evolution Strategy
Start minimal -> Grow organically -> Refactor when painful
Start with flat structure – create subdirectories only when you have 5+ related files or clear implementation variants. The threshold exists because below 5 files, subdirectories add navigation overhead without improving discoverability.
Don't architect for theoretical future complexity. Address actual complexity when it emerges with clear user needs driving structural decisions.
When refactoring to deeper structure: Move files one domain at a time. Create the new subdirectory, move related presenters/services into it, update namespaces, and verify. Don't reorganize everything at once.
Configuration
- config/common.neon: Main application configuration
- config/services.neon: Service definitions and auto-wiring configuration
For DI configuration details (service registration, autowiring, parameters), see the nette-configuration skill.
Core vs Model Decision Matrix
The distinction matters because Core/ code is reusable across projects while Model/ code is specific to your business. This affects testability, replaceability, and team ownership.
Use Core/ for:
- Technology-agnostic infrastructure (MyExplorer, RouterFactory, QueueMailer)
- External service integrations (SentryLogger, AI/, GoogleSearch/)
- Framework extensions and utilities
- Code that could be moved to another project unchanged
Use Model/ for:
- Business domain logic (CatalogService, CustomerService, OrderService)
- Domain-specific operations and rules
- Entity-specific processing logic
- Code that knows about your business concepts (products, orders, customers)
Model Layer Principles
app/Model/
├── CatalogService.php ← Main domain services at root
├── CustomerService.php
├── OrderService.php
├── mails/ ← Email templates (specialized assets)
├── Payment/ ← Implementation variants
│ ├── CardOnlinePayment.php
│ ├── BankTransferPayment.php
│ └── CashPayment.php
└── exceptions.php ← Domain exceptions
Naming convention: mails/ is lowercase because it contains non-PHP assets (email templates). Payment/ is uppercase because it contains PHP classes following PSR-4.
Service placement rules:
- Main domain coordinator services directly in Model/
- Implementation variants get subdirectories when 3+ implementations exist
- Specialized assets (templates, exceptions) in focused locations
Module Structure
Modules group presenters by user audience and access requirements. Admin, Front, and Api have different authentication, layouts, and URL patterns – that's why they're separate modules, not just for organization.
app/Presentation/
├── Accessory/ ← UI shared across entire application
│ ├── LatteExtension.php
│ └── TemplateFilters.php
├── Admin/
│ ├── BasePresenter.php ← Admin-specific functionality
│ ├── Auth/ ← Authentication
│ ├── Catalog/ ← Product management
│ │ ├── Brand/
│ │ ├── List/ ← Overview/utility presenters
│ │ └── Product/
│ └── Fulfill/ ← Order processing
└── Front/
├── Customer/
└── Listing/
Keep presenters flat until complexity demands structure:
# Start simple
Dashboard/DashboardPresenter.php
# Grow when needed
Admin/Catalog/Product/ProductPresenter.php
Admin/Catalog/Brand/BrandPresenter.php
Admin/Catalog/List/ListPresenter.php
Create nested structure when:
- Single functional area has 4+ presenters
- Clear sub-domains emerge (Product management, Order fulfillment)
- Shared logic between related presenters
Presenter Directory Contents
Each presenter directory contains the presenter class, its templates, and its local components:
Product/
├── ProductPresenter.php
├── default.latte
├── edit.latte
└── ProductFormFactory.php ← Form factory used only by this presenter
For template organization details (layouts, partials, @-prefixed files), see the latte-templates skill.
Base Presenter Strategy
Create BasePresenter for each major module only when needed:
Admin\BasePresenter – authentication checks, admin-specific setup
- Contains common
startup() checks, beforeRender() template variables
Avoid deep inheritance – prefer composition over inheritance chains deeper than BasePresenter -> SpecificPresenter. Deep chains make it hard to understand which method runs when and create fragile coupling between unrelated presenters.
Component, Factory, and Accessory Placement
Where to place components, form factories, Latte extensions, and other shared code follows a proximity principle – keep code close to where it's used:
In the presenter directory – used by one presenter only:
Product/
├── ProductPresenter.php
├── ProductFormFactory.php ← Only ProductPresenter uses this
└── edit.latte
In Module/Accessory/ – shared across presenters within one module:
Admin/
├── Accessory/
│ ├── DataGridFactory.php ← Used by multiple Admin presenters
│ └── AdminFilters.php ← Admin-specific template helpers
├── Product/
└── Order/
In Presentation/Accessory/ – shared across modules:
Presentation/
├── Accessory/
│ ├── LatteExtension.php ← App-wide Latte filters/functions
│ ├── NavigationFactory.php ← Used in Admin and Front
│ └── TemplateFilters.php
Form factories that encapsulate form creation with validation and callbacks are preferred over building forms directly in presenters when the same form appears in multiple places. For form factory implementation patterns, see the nette-forms skill.
When to Create New Module
Create module when:
- You have 5+ related presenters
- Functionality has distinct user base (Admin vs Front vs Api)
- Different authentication/authorization requirements
- Separate URL structure patterns
Avoid modules for:
- Single presenter with single purpose
- Artificial separation without clear user/functional boundaries
Tasks and Command Organization
app/Tasks/
├── Maintenance/ ← Cleanup, optimization
├── Integration/ ← External data sync
└── Scheduled/ ← Recurring operations
Task responsibility boundaries:
- Tasks handle execution context (CLI arguments, error handling, scheduling)
- Business logic stays in Model services
- Tasks coordinate, services execute
This separation means business logic is testable without CLI context and reusable from presenters or other entry points.
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
Don't create directories prematurely – a directory with one file is harder to navigate than a flat list. Wait until you have actual complexity (5+ related files), not anticipated complexity.
Don't separate by technical layer – Services/, Repositories/, Controllers/ separation forces you to jump between directories for every feature change. Domain organization keeps related code together.
Don't create deep hierarchies – prefer descriptive names over nested structure (OrderFulfillmentService vs Fulfill/Order/Service). Deep nesting increases cognitive load and makes imports longer without adding clarity.
Don't duplicate Base presenter logic – if two modules need the same functionality, extract it to a trait or a shared service. Copying leads to divergence and bugs when one copy gets updated but not the other.
Online Documentation
For detailed information, use WebFetch on these URLs: