architecturestandards

name	architecture/standards
description	BMAD Architecture methodology, quality standards, and reference data for creating architecture decision documents

BMAD Architecture Standards

Philosophy: Architecture for AI Agent Consistency

A BMAD Architecture Document serves two audiences simultaneously:

1. Human stakeholders - Technical leads, architects, and developers who need clear architectural guidance and rationale
2. LLM downstream consumers - AI agents handling implementation, code generation, and development who need precise, unambiguous patterns to follow

The architecture document ensures all AI agents implement consistently — preventing conflicts in naming, structure, communication patterns, and process decisions.

Core Quality Standards

Decision Completeness

Every architectural decision must be:

• Explicit - No implicit assumptions or "standard practice" shortcuts
• Versioned - Specific technology versions, not "latest"
• Rationale-backed - Why this choice was made
• Scoped - What components/areas it affects

Pattern Specificity

Implementation patterns must be concrete enough that two independent AI agents would produce compatible code:

• Naming conventions with examples (good and bad)
• Structure patterns with exact file/directory paths
• Communication patterns with payload formats
• Process patterns with error handling approaches

Structure Concreteness

Project structure must be:

• Complete directory trees, not generic placeholders
• Technology-specific, not abstract
• Mapped to requirements/epics
• Include all configuration, source, test, and build files

What Makes a Good Architecture Document

Required Document Sections

1. Project Context Analysis - Requirements overview, scale assessment, constraints
2. Starter Template Evaluation - Technology domain, starter selection, rationale
3. Core Architectural Decisions - Data, auth, API, frontend, infrastructure decisions with versions
4. Implementation Patterns - Naming, structure, format, communication, process patterns
5. Project Structure - Complete directory tree, boundaries, requirement mapping
6. Architecture Validation Results - Coherence, coverage, readiness assessment

Anti-Patterns to Detect and Fix

• Decisions without version numbers
• Generic structure placeholders instead of specific trees
• Missing rationale for technology choices
• Patterns without concrete examples
• Inconsistent naming across different pattern categories
• Requirements not mapped to architectural components

Reference Data

For project classification and starter template guidance:

• references/project-types.csv - Project type detection signals and typical starters
• references/domain-complexity.csv - Domain complexity levels and suggested workflows