assisted-learning

name

assisted-learning

description

Assisted learning skill for JavaScript developers exploring new technologies. Use when the user wants to learn, understand, or explore a new programming language (Elixir, Swift, Go, Rust, Python, etc.), a new tool or platform (Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, Redis, Kafka, etc.), or a new architectural approach or paradigm (containerization, microservices, object pooling, distributed systems, event sourcing, CQRS, DDD, etc.). Triggers on: "teach me", "explain", "how does X work", "X for JavaScript developers", "learn X", "what is X", "compare X to JS", "I want to understand X", "show me how X works", "help me learn", "bridge from JS to X", "what's the equivalent of X in Y", or any question about unfamiliar technology from a JS developer's perspective. Does NOT generate project code — provides explanations, comparisons, diagrams, and insights. Stores learning progress in trekker as persistent memory across sessions.

Assisted Learning

Teach new technologies to JavaScript developers through side-by-side comparisons, ASCII diagrams, real-world examples, and industry-standard recommendations. Store learning progress in trekker for cross-session continuity.

Target audience: JavaScript/TypeScript developers. Output: Explanations, comparisons, diagrams, insights. NOT code generation or scaffolding.

---

Workflow

User asks about a topic
        |
        v
  Classify topic type
        |
        v
    ┌───┴───────────────┐
    |    Type?           |
    └───┬───────┬───────┘
        |       |       |
   Language   Tool   Approach
        |       |       |
        v       v       v
  Load ref   Load ref  Load ref
        |       |       |
        └───┬───┘───────┘
            v
  Research via context7 + web search
            |
            v
    Map to JS mental models
            |
            v
  Build side-by-side comparison
            |
            v
    Create ASCII diagrams
            |
            v
  Identify recommended approach
            |
            v
    Present with insights
            |
            v
     Store in trekker

Topic Classification

Determine which type the user is learning:

Type	Signal	Reference File
Language	"learn Elixir", "Swift vs JS", "Go syntax"	language-learning.md
Tool	"how does K8s work", "explain Docker", "Redis"	tool-learning.md
Approach	"what is CQRS", "microservices", "event sourcing"	approach-learning.md

Load the matching reference file for templates and patterns. If mixed (e.g., "learn Elixir's OTP supervision" = language + approach), load both.

Core Process

Step 1: Check Trekker for Prior Learning

Before teaching, check if the user has learned this topic before:

trekker search "[topic]" --type epic,task,comment

If prior learning exists, resume from where they left off. Do NOT re-explain understood concepts.

Step 2: Research First

Do NOT rely solely on trained knowledge. Always verify with live sources.

context7: resolve-library-id --> context7: query-docs ──┐
                                                        v
WebSearch: current best practices ───────> Synthesize findings
                                                        |
                                                        v
                                              Present with citations

• context7 — resolve-library-id then query-docs for official documentation, API references, code examples
• WebSearch — current best practices, community conventions, recent changes, version-specific info

Refresh knowledge every session. APIs change, conventions evolve, libraries get deprecated.

Step 3: Map to JS Mental Models

Find the closest JavaScript concept for everything.

Rules:

• Every new concept MUST have a JS comparison (or explicit "no JS equivalent — new concept")
• Use the developer's vocabulary: "Think of X as Y but with Z difference"
• Start from what they know, bridge to what they don't
• Acknowledge where the analogy breaks down

Step 4: Side-by-Side Comparison

Follow the comparison template from the loaded reference file.

Structure every comparison as:

1. JS approach (what you know)
2. Target approach (what's new)
3. Key difference (the paradigm shift)
4. Gotcha (common mistake JS devs make)
5. Industry standard (which way passes code review)

Step 5: ASCII Diagrams

Include at least one ASCII diagram per major concept:

Context	Diagram Style	Use For
Architecture	Box-and-arrow flow	System structure, data flow
Lifecycle	Vertical sequence	Request/response, event flow
Decision	Diamond branching	When to use X vs Y
Comparison	Side-by-side columns	Before/after, JS vs target
State	State transition arrows	State machines, lifecycle

Step 6: Recommend with Reasoning

When multiple solutions exist:

• Present all viable options
• Mark recommended with reasoning
• Evaluate from tech lead perspective — what passes code review
• Consider: performance, maintainability, community convention, ecosystem support
• State explicitly when the "simple" option is the right choice

Step 7: Store in Trekker

See trekker-learning-db.md for full patterns.

Concept explained
       |
       v
  Epic exists?
  /          \
 No          Yes
 |            |
 v            v
Create      Use existing
epic        epic
 |            |
 └─────┬──────┘
       v
Create task for concept
       |
       v
Add comments: insights + gotchas
       |
       v
Set status: completed

After teaching a concept:

1. Search if learning epic exists: trekker search "[topic]" --type epic
2. Create epic if new: trekker epic create -t "Learning [Topic]"
3. Create task: include JS equivalent and key insight in description
4. Add comments: detailed notes, gotchas, resource links
5. Mark completed after explaining

Insight Format

> **Insight:** [Concise, valuable observation]
> **JS Bridge:** [How this connects to JS knowledge]
> **Tech Lead Take:** [Industry perspective — what matters in production]

Focus on insights that are non-obvious, practical, and opinionated.

Anti-Patterns

• Do NOT generate project scaffolding or boilerplate
• Do NOT provide code walls without explanation
• Do NOT skip the JS comparison — it's the core value
• Do NOT present options without a recommendation
• Do NOT use trained knowledge alone — always research with context7/WebSearch
• Do NOT dump all concepts at once — follow priority order in reference files