Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
["Analyze code changes in pull requests to catch vulnerabilities early","Always check dependencies for CVEs via OSV.dev integration","Produce structured JSON output for automated pipelines","Flag LLM-specific risks (prompt injection, unsafe output handling)","Report precision and recall benchmarks when assessing coverage"]
error_handling
graceful
streaming
supported
verified
false
lastVerifiedAt
"2026-02-19T05:29:09.098Z"
source
builtin
trust_score
100
provenance_sha
bef705454e10ccb7
Gemini CLI Security Skill
AI-powered security analysis skill adapted from the Gemini CLI Security Extension (github.com/gemini-cli-extensions/security). Provides vulnerability detection across code and dependencies with 90% precision and 93% recall on TypeScript/JavaScript CVE datasets.
- Code vulnerability analysis (/security:analyze pattern)
- OSV.dev dependency scanning (/security:scan-deps pattern)
- Hardcoded credentials and secrets detection
- Injection attack detection (XSS, SQL, command, SSRF, template)
- Weak cryptography and insecure deserialization detection
- Authentication and session management flaw detection
- LLM-specific risks: prompt injection, unsafe output handling
- JSON output formatting for CI/CD pipeline integration
- GitHub Actions integration patterns for automated PR analysis
Overview
This skill adapts the Gemini CLI Security Extension's analysis methodology for the agent-studio framework. The original extension uses two MCP server patterns — a security analysis server and an OSV-Scanner integration — to provide dual-vector coverage. This skill implements equivalent analysis using native Claude Code tools (WebFetch for OSV.dev API, Grep/Bash for static analysis patterns).
Before merging pull requests to detect introduced vulnerabilities
During security reviews of new code changes
For dependency auditing against known CVE databases
For LLM-integrated applications requiring prompt injection defense review
As part of CI/CD pipeline security gates
Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT SECURITY ANALYSIS FOR AUTH/SECRETS/EXTERNAL-INPUT HANDLERS
All code paths handling authentication, hardcoded values, external input, or AI model outputs MUST be analyzed before production deployment.
Vulnerability Coverage
Category 1: Secrets Management
Pattern
Detection Method
Hardcoded API keys
Grep for key patterns + entropy analysis
Hardcoded passwords
Credential keyword detection
Private keys in source
PEM block / base64 key detection
Encryption keys
Symmetric key constant patterns
Category 2: Injection Attacks
Attack Type
Examples
SQL injection
String concatenation in queries
XSS
Unescaped user content in HTML/JS output
Command injection
Shell exec with user-controlled args
SSRF
User-controlled URLs in server requests
Template injection
Unsanitized user input in template engines
Category 3: Authentication Flaws
Flaw
Detection
Session bypass
Missing auth middleware
Weak tokens
Predictable token generation
Insecure password reset
Token-less or email-only resets
Missing MFA enforcement
Auth flows without 2FA checks
Category 4: Data Handling
Issue
Detection
Weak cryptography
MD5/SHA1 for secrets; DES/RC4 usage
Sensitive data in logs
PII/credential patterns in log statements
PII violations
Unencrypted PII storage or transmission
Insecure deserialization
Unsafe pickle/eval/deserialize calls
Category 5: LLM Safety (Novel)
Risk
Detection
Prompt injection
User content injected into LLM prompts without sanitization
Unsafe output handling
LLM output used in exec/eval/shell without validation
Insecure tool integration
Tool calls with unchecked LLM-provided parameters
Usage
Invocation
// From an agentSkill({ skill: 'gemini-cli-security' });
// With arguments via Bash integrationSkill({ skill: 'gemini-cli-security', args: 'src/ --scan-deps' });
Workflow Execution
# Analyze code in a directory
node .claude/skills/gemini-cli-security/scripts/main.cjs --target src/
# Scan dependencies for CVEs
node .claude/skills/gemini-cli-security/scripts/main.cjs --scan-deps
# JSON output for CI integration
node .claude/skills/gemini-cli-security/scripts/main.cjs --target . --json
# Scoped analysis with natural language
node .claude/skills/gemini-cli-security/scripts/main.cjs --target src/auth/ --scope "focus on token handling and session management"
Output Format
Default output (markdown report):
## Security Analysis Report### CRITICAL- [AUTH-001] Hardcoded API key found in src/config.ts:42
Pattern: `const API_KEY = "sk-..."`
Remediation: Move to environment variable
### HIGH- [INJ-002] SQL injection risk in src/db/users.ts:87
Pattern: String concatenation in query builder
Remediation: Use parameterized queries
### Dependencies- lodash@4.17.15 → CVE-2021-23337 (HIGH) - Prototype pollution
Fix: Upgrade to lodash@4.17.21+
JSON output (--json flag):
{"findings":[{"id":"AUTH-001","severity":"CRITICAL","category":"secrets","file":"src/config.ts","line":42,"description":"Hardcoded API key","remediation":"Move to environment variable"}],"dependencies":[{"package":"lodash","version":"4.17.15","cve":"CVE-2021-23337","severity":"HIGH","fix":"4.17.21"}],"summary":{"critical":1,"high":2,"medium":3,"low":0,"precision":0.9,"recall":0.93}}
OSV.dev Dependency Scanning
The skill integrates with the OSV.dev API (no authentication required) to check dependencies:
// OSV.dev batch query endpointWebFetch({
url: 'https://api.osv.dev/v1/querybatch',
prompt: 'Extract vulnerability IDs, severity, and affected versions for these packages',
});
Why native tools over MCP servers:
The original extension uses two MCP servers (security analysis server + OSV-Scanner binary). This skill uses native Claude Code tools instead:
WebFetch replaces OSV-Scanner for dependency CVE lookups (OSV.dev has a public REST API)
Grep/Bash replace the security analysis server for pattern-based detection
This approach works immediately without binary installation or session restart
Deviation from source: The original uses Gemini AI for code analysis; this skill uses the pattern-based detection methodology documented in the extension's benchmarking. The AI analysis component can be provided by the invoking agent (security-architect) rather than an embedded AI call.
Assigned Agents
Agent
Role
security-architect
Primary: comprehensive security audits
developer
Supporting: pre-commit security checks
code-reviewer
Supporting: PR review security layer
Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
New vulnerability pattern found -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
Issue with scanning -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
Decision about scope -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.