ai-generated-business-code-review

name	ai-generated-business-code-review
description	Use when reviewing or scoring AI-generated business/application code quality in any language, especially when a numeric score, risk level, or must-fix checklist is requested, or when C++ code must comply with OpenHarmony C++ and security standards

AI Business Code Review

Overview

Review AI-generated business/application code for correctness, robustness, maintainability, performance, and security. Output a 0-10 score, a risk level, and a must-fix checklist. For C++ code, REQUIRED: use openharmony-cpp and openharmony-security-review as hard constraints.

When to Use

• AI-generated business/app code review or quality evaluation
• Need scoring, risk level, or must-fix checklist
• C++ business code must meet OpenHarmony coding/security requirements

Workflow

1. Identify language and code type (business vs test). If test code, use ai-generated-ut-code-review instead.
2. For C++: load and apply openharmony-cpp + openharmony-security-review as mandatory constraints.
3. Inspect behavior vs requirements, edge cases, error handling, resource management, and security.
4. Score by rubric, assign risk level, list must-fix items with concrete evidence (file/line or snippet).

Scoring (0-10)

Each dimension 0-2 points. Sum = total score.

Dimension	0	1	2
Correctness	Wrong/missing key behavior	Partial/assumptions	Meets requirements
Robustness	Crashes/leaks/unchecked errors	Some edge handling	Solid edge/error handling
Maintainability	Hard to read/modify	Mixed quality	Clear structure & naming
Performance	Inefficient hot paths	Acceptable but improvable	Efficient for expected load
Security	Clear vulnerabilities	Weak validation/unsafe	Safe-by-default, validated

Risk Levels

• Blocker: security漏洞、严重逻辑错误、或违反 C++ 强制规范
• High: 关键路径缺失、异常处理不完整、明显资源泄漏
• Medium: 维护性或性能风险显著
• Low: 轻微问题或风格一致性

Must-Fix Checklist

• 外部输入有明确校验与错误反馈
• 关键异常路径可达且可观测（日志/错误码/异常）
• 资源释放或 RAII 保证（C++）
• C++ 场景满足 openharmony-cpp 与 openharmony-security-review

AI-Generated Code Pitfalls (Check Explicitly)

• 需求误解、隐含前提错误
• 只覆盖 happy-path，忽略异常/边界
• 吞异常或默认值不合理
• 复制粘贴造成重复与不一致
• 过度复杂化或抽象错误

Output Format (Required, Semi-fixed)

• Score: x/10 — Correctness x, Robustness x, Maintainability x, Performance x, Security x
• Risk: Low/Medium/High/Blocker — 简述风险原因（1 行）
• Must-fix:
  • [动作 + 证据]
  • [动作 + 证据]
• Key Evidence:
  • 引用具体函数/类/路径（1-2 条）
• Notes:
  • 最小修复建议或替代方案（1-2 行）

Rules:

• C++ 必须在 Key Evidence 或 Must-fix 中明确指出违反 openharmony-cpp/openharmony-security-review 的点
• 至少 2 条证据；证据不足需说明并降分
• 禁止只给总体评价

Common Mistakes

• 只给总体评价，不给证据
• 忽略 C++ 强制规范
• 将风格问题当作阻断风险

Example (Concise)

Score: 6/10 (Correctness 1, Robustness 1, Maintainability 1, Performance 1, Security 2) Risk: High Must-fix:

• Missing input validation in createUser() (null/empty, length, format)
• Error path swallows exceptions without logging Key Evidence:
• createUser() accepts raw input without checks
• catch block is empty in persistUser() Notes:
• Add explicit validation and return structured errors.