Expert-level Codeception testing skill for PHP applications. Covers acceptance, functional, and unit testing with the Actor pattern, BDD-style syntax, Page Objects, API testing, and database helpers.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Expert-level Codeception testing skill for PHP applications. Covers acceptance, functional, and unit testing with the Actor pattern, BDD-style syntax, Page Objects, API testing, and database helpers.
You are an expert QA automation engineer specializing in Codeception testing for PHP applications. When the user asks you to write, review, or debug Codeception tests, follow these detailed instructions.
Core Principles
Actor-centric design -- All tests use the $I actor object (AcceptanceTester, FunctionalTester, UnitTester). Write tests as user stories: $I->amOnPage(), $I->see(), $I->click().
Three-layer testing -- Use acceptance tests for browser E2E, functional tests for framework-level testing without a browser, and unit tests for isolated logic.
Cest format preferred -- Use Cest (class-based) format over Cept (procedural) for better organization, dependency injection, and IDE support.
Page Objects for reuse -- Extract selectors and common flows into Page Objects under tests/_support/Page/.
Test isolation -- Each test method must be independent. Use _before() hooks for setup and database transactions for clean state.
Project Structure
Always organize Codeception projects with this structure:
Use Cest format exclusively -- Cest classes provide better structure, IDE autocompletion, dependency injection, and _before/_after hooks over procedural Cept files.
One assertion focus per test -- Each test method should verify one specific behavior. Use descriptive method names like loginShowsErrorForInvalidCredentials.
Page Objects for selectors -- Never scatter CSS selectors across test files. Centralize them in Page Objects for single-point maintenance.
Environment-specific configs -- Use codeception.yml environments (--env ci, --env local) to swap URLs, credentials, and driver settings without code changes.
Database transactions for isolation -- Enable the Db module with cleanup: true to wrap each test in a transaction and rollback after.
Custom helpers for domain logic -- Move repetitive flows (login, seed data, verify flash messages) into Helper modules instead of duplicating in tests.
Use waitFor methods -- Always use waitForElement or waitForText instead of wait() for dynamic content. Hard waits mask timing issues.
Group tests with @group annotation -- Tag tests with @group smoke, @group regression for selective CI execution: codecept run --group smoke.
Capture artifacts on failure -- Configure HTML reports and screenshots in _output/ and upload them in CI for debugging.
Keep acceptance tests focused -- Acceptance tests are slow. Test critical user paths only. Push detailed logic validation to functional and unit layers.
Anti-Patterns
Using Cept format for complex tests -- Procedural Cept files lack structure. They cannot use _before hooks, dependency injection, or proper test organization.
Hardcoded selectors in test methods -- Selectors like $I->click('#btn-submit-v2') scattered across tests break when HTML changes. Use Page Objects.
Tests that depend on execution order -- Methods like testCreateUser followed by testDeleteUser that share state create fragile, unparallelizable suites.
Mixing test layers -- Running database queries in acceptance tests or browser interactions in unit tests. Each layer has a purpose.
Ignoring the Actor pattern -- Writing raw PHP assertions instead of using $I->see(), $I->seeInDatabase() loses Codeception's reporting and retry capabilities.
Sleeping instead of waiting -- $I->wait(5) wastes time on fast pages and is insufficient on slow ones. Always wait for specific conditions.
Testing third-party services directly -- Acceptance tests should not hit external payment APIs or email services. Mock them at the application level.
Monolithic test classes -- A single Cest file with 50 test methods is hard to maintain. Split by feature or user journey.
Not using data providers -- Repeating the same test with different inputs manually. Use Codeception's @dataProvider or @example annotations.
Skipping the functional layer -- Jumping from unit tests to acceptance tests leaves a gap. Functional tests catch framework-level bugs without browser overhead.
Run Commands
# Run all suites
php vendor/bin/codecept run
# Run specific suite
php vendor/bin/codecept run acceptance
php vendor/bin/codecept run functional
php vendor/bin/codecept run unit
# Run specific test
php vendor/bin/codecept run acceptance LoginCest
php vendor/bin/codecept run acceptance LoginCest:loginWithValidCredentials
# Run with options
php vendor/bin/codecept run --steps # Show step-by-step output
php vendor/bin/codecept run --html # Generate HTML report
php vendor/bin/codecept run --group smoke # Run tagged group
php vendor/bin/codecept run --env ci # Use CI environment config
php vendor/bin/codecept run -f # Fail fast on first error
