| name | translation-quality-mqm |
| description | MQM(Multidimensional Quality Metrics) Translation Quality Framework, error classification , severity weight, score calculation Formula quality-reviewer Extended Skill. 'MQM ', 'Translation Quality ', 'error classification', 'Translation QA', 'Quality ric' etc. Translation Qualityof Verification . , Translation Localization application of . |
Translation Quality MQM — Translation Quality Assessment Framework
MQM error classification, severity system, and score calculation formulas used by the quality-reviewer agent when verifying translation quality.
subject Agent
quality-reviewer — of MQM Framework Translation Quality in apply.
MQM error classification
1: vs (7 )
| | description | weight |
|---|
| Accuracy (Accuracy) | ACC | Source text ofof before | x2.0 |
| Fluency (Fluency) | FLU | Target languageof | x1.5 |
| Terminology (Terminology) | TER | Terminology Consistencyand Accuracy | x1.5 |
| Style (Style) | STY | Text typein Writing style | x1.0 |
| to (Locale) | LOC | Localization | x1.5 |
| Design (Design) | DES | , Layout, | x0.5 |
| **** (Verity) | VER | relationship, Accuracy | x2.0 |
2: type
ACC (Accuracy)
| type | description | when |
|---|
| ACC-ADD | andTranslation | Source textin Information | "good" → " " |
| ACC-OMI | omission | Source text Information Translation | omission |
| ACC-MIS | mistranslation | of | "decrease" → "" |
| ACC-UNT | Translation | Source text vsto | Translation subject |
| ACC-AMB | duringof | Translation | |
FLU (Fluency)
| type | description |
|---|
| FLU-GRA | | , , when, |
| FLU-PUN | | , , |
| FLU-SPE | customized | , |
| FLU-REG | language etc. | Formality level |
| FLU-AWK | | |
TER (Terminology)
| type | description |
|---|
| TER-INC | Terminology | Glossaryand Translation |
| TER-DNT | DNT | Translation Terminology Translation |
| TER-WRG | Terminology | Industry standardsand Terminology |
LOC (to)
| type | description |
|---|
| LOC-DAT | Date Format | Date application |
| LOC-NUM | number Format | , |
| LOC-CUR | Currency Format | Currency , |
| LOC-UNI | Units of measurement | /, / |
| LOC-CUL | | and conflict expression |
severity etc.
| etc. | | | |
|---|
| **** (Critical) | CRI | 25 | of before , , expression |
| major (Major) | MAJ | 10 | of , |
| **** (Minor) | MIN | 1 | Style , |
score calculation Formula
when = SUM(per severity x weight)
= when / x 1000
Quality etc.:
0~5 → Excellent (Publishing )
5~15 → Good ( after Publishing)
15~30 → Acceptable ( )
30~50 → Poor (vs )
50+ → Reject (Translation )
Quality
# Translation Quality
## summary
- Source text language / Target language: [X → Y]
- : [N]
- : MQM v3.0
- : [X.X] / etc.: [Excellent|Good|Acceptable|Poor|Reject]
## distribution
| | CRI | MAJ | MIN | during |
|------|-----|-----|-----|----------|
| Accuracy (ACC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fluency (FLU) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Terminology (TER) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Style (STY) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| to (LOC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Design (DES) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| (VER) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| **** | 0 | 0 | 0 | **0** |
## detailed
| # | | Source text | Translated text | | severity | Suggestion |
|---|------|------|--------|---------|--------|----------|
| 1 | p.3 L12 | ... | ... | ACC-MIS | MAJ | ... |
## (Positive Findings)
- [ ]
##
1. [ ]
2. [ ]
per during Verification
| Verification | per of |
|---|
| **** | ACC Accuracy, VER | Terminology Accuracy, |
| of | ACC Accuracy, TER Terminology | of Terminology, / Accuracy |
| **** | FLU Fluency, STY Style | , Tone & voice |
| /IT | TER Terminology, ACC Accuracy | UI , Preservation |
| **** | FLU Fluency, LOC to | ric , |
| **** | ACC Accuracy, VER | number, Currency, |
languageper major
→
| description | correct |
|---|
| vsto Translation | to before |
| and Translation | "~ during" | |
| and | | |
| Translation | "the/a" "/of"to | vs |
→
| description | correct |
|---|
| level | when Selection | Audiencein |
| to | Verification |
| vsto | |
