DesignCrowd (designcrowd.com) platform help — a HUMAN crowdsourcing custom-design contest marketplace (a 99designs/Designhill/Crowdspring peer), NOT an AI/DIY logo maker: write a brief, pay upfront, 25-100+ real designers submit competing designs across 60+ categories (logo, web, print, merch); pick a winner who transfers FULL COPYRIGHT + pro source files. One-time per project (best-effort) + a NON-REFUNDABLE posting fee + a percentage project fee; the money-back guarantee EXCLUDES the posting fee and guaranteed projects (the #1 billing complaint). Crowdsourcing means variable quality + a real plagiarism risk — run reverse-image + USPTO/EUIPO clearance first. UI-only — NO self-serve API (white-label/wholesale + affiliate are reseller, not automation). Use for how contests work, pricing/posting-fee/refund, copyright & source files, plagiarism/quality risk, contest-vs-1-to-1, or API/automation. Do NOT use to validate the idea (/sales-idea-validation) or for a free/cheap DIY logo (/sales-hatchful).
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
DesignCrowd (designcrowd.com) platform help — a HUMAN crowdsourcing custom-design contest marketplace (a 99designs/Designhill/Crowdspring peer), NOT an AI/DIY logo maker: write a brief, pay upfront, 25-100+ real designers submit competing designs across 60+ categories (logo, web, print, merch); pick a winner who transfers FULL COPYRIGHT + pro source files. One-time per project (best-effort) + a NON-REFUNDABLE posting fee + a percentage project fee; the money-back guarantee EXCLUDES the posting fee and guaranteed projects (the #1 billing complaint). Crowdsourcing means variable quality + a real plagiarism risk — run reverse-image + USPTO/EUIPO clearance first. UI-only — NO self-serve API (white-label/wholesale + affiliate are reseller, not automation). Use for how contests work, pricing/posting-fee/refund, copyright & source files, plagiarism/quality risk, contest-vs-1-to-1, or API/automation. Do NOT use to validate the idea (/sales-idea-validation) or for a free/cheap DIY logo (/sales-hatchful).
argument-hint
[describe what you need help with in DesignCrowd]
license
MIT
version
1.0.1
tags
["sales","branding","pre-launch","platform"]
DesignCrowd Platform Help
DesignCrowd (designcrowd.com) is a crowdsourcing custom-design contest marketplace — you post a brief,
pay upfront, and a global pool of real freelance designers (1.3M+ registered) submit competing custom
designs; you review the entries and pick a winner, who hands over the final files. It spans 60+ design
services (logo, web/landing pages, print, packaging, merch, illustration, social/marketing graphics). It's a peer
of 99designs / Designhill / Crowdspring (contest marketplaces) — not the budget logo-maker cluster
(Hatchful / DesignEvo / Namecheap / LOGO.com), which are DIY/AI tools you operate yourself. Design is downstream
of a locked name, which is downstream of a validated idea, so validate demand first (/sales-idea-validation → a
real behavior test) and settle the name (/sales-namelix) before you pay real designers to brand it.
The first fact that frames every answer — it's HUMAN crowdsourcing, not AI/DIY. You write a brief and 25–100+
real designers compete for your money with original, custom work; the winner transfers full copyright +
professional/source files to you. The trade: custom human design + real ownership (a genuine edge over
shared-template makers, where every buyer starts from the same template) — but it costs hundreds of dollars,
not $0, takes days, not minutes, quality varies designer-to-designer, and crowdsourcing carries a real
plagiarism/stolen-design risk (reviewers report winning entries later found copied). Want a free/cheap DIY logo
in minutes? Wrong tool — use the logo-maker cluster. Want custom human work you fully own? Right one.
The second fact — one-time per project, but three charges stack, and the guarantee has carve-outs. A project is
a one-time buy (no subscription), but the price is package + posting fee + a percentage fee: logo packages
run ~$109–$739 (best-effort — more designs/designers at higher tiers), plus a NON-REFUNDABLE posting fee
(~$29–$129) and a ~4% project fee, plus optional upgrades (~$30–$150 — top designers, private/blind
project, express 3-day turnaround). There is a money-back guarantee, but it excludes the posting fee,
the ~4% fee, and "guaranteed" projects (refund window reported — sources conflict). This
carve-out is the (PissedConsumer ~1.7★). All pricing .
30 or 60 days
#1 source of billing complaints
best-effort → verify at
designcrowd.com
Step 1 — Gather context
If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated platform knowledge.
Ask only what you can't infer:
What do you want from DesignCrowd?
A) Understand how a contest works (brief → competing entries → pick a winner → get files)
B) Pricing — packages, the non-refundable posting fee, the ~4% fee, and upgrades
C) A refund / money-back guarantee question (and what it excludes)
D) Copyright & files — what you own and which source/pro files you receive
E) Quality / plagiarism — dealing with weak or stolen entries
F) Contest vs 1-to-1 — a crowd of designers vs hiring one directly
What are you designing, and how custom does it need to be? A generic mark you'll DIY → the logo cluster is
cheaper/faster; a custom, owned design you'll build a business on → a contest fits.
Skip-ahead: a name (not a design) → /sales-namelix; the validate-before-building method or a branding-tool
comparison across the market → /sales-idea-validation; a free/cheap DIY logo → /sales-hatchful (free PNG) or
/sales-namecheap-logo-maker (free SVG) — route in Step 2.
Step 2 — Route or answer directly
If the user's question is about…
Route to
Generating the business name itself (not the design)
/sales-namelix {question}
The validate-before-building method, or comparing branding/design tools across the market
/sales-idea-validation {question}
A free DIY logo (Namecheap gives free vector SVG; DesignCrowd is paid human work)
/sales-namecheap-logo-maker {question}
A free usable PNG logo in minutes (vs paying real designers)
/sales-hatchful {question}
A cheap one-time AI logo (vs a $100s+ human contest)
/sales-designevo {question}
Building the wider social/marketing creative or a design system at scale
/sales-canva {question}
When routing, give the exact command: "This is a {domain} question — run: /sales-namelix {original question}"
Otherwise, answer DesignCrowd–specific questions using Step 3.
Step 3 — DesignCrowd reference
Read references/platform-guide.md for the full reference — the brief → contest → pick winner → download
workflow and every module's automation tag; the complete pricing anatomy (packages, the non-refundable posting
fee, the ~4% fee, upgrades, and how the money-back guarantee's carve-outs work); contest vs 1-to-1
project; the copyright + source-files transfer (what you own and receive) and the plagiarism/originality
risk with how to defend against it; the quality-variance playbook (writing a tight brief, using upgrades); and
the no-self-serve-API reality (why generation can't be scripted, and what the white-label/wholesale + affiliate
programs actually are).
Answer using only the relevant section — don't dump the full reference.
Step 4 — Actionable guidance
Lead with the model: it's human crowdsourcing, not a DIY tool. Set expectations up front — you write a brief,
pay upfront, and 25–100+ real designers submit competing custom designs; you pick a winner and receive the
files. The upside is custom work + full ownership; the cost is money (hundreds), time (days), variable
quality, and plagiarism risk. If they wanted a free/instant logo, redirect to the logo-maker cluster.
Break the price into its three parts — and name the non-refundable posting fee. Quote it as package
($109–$739) + a NON-REFUNDABLE posting fee ($29–$129) + a ~4% project fee, plus optional upgrades
(~$30–$150: top designers, private/blind project, express turnaround). Higher packages buy more designs/more
designers, not different ownership. Flag every figure as best-effort → confirm at designcrowd.com.
Explain the money-back guarantee honestly — the carve-outs are the trap. There is a guarantee, but it
refunds the project budget only — not the posting fee, not the ~4% fee, and "guaranteed" projects are
excluded (refund window reported 30 or 60 days — verify). Nearly all "they kept my money" complaints trace to
these exclusions, so tell users the posting fee is spent the moment they launch.
The ownership is real — but originality is on you. On selection the winner transfers full copyright + the
professional/source files (a genuine edge over shared-template makers). But crowdsourced entries can be
copied/stock-traced — so before you rely on the mark, run a reverse-image search on the winning design and
a USPTO/EUIPO clearance + distinctiveness check, and grab the domain + handles. Copyright transfer ≠ a
registered trademark.
Fix quality variance with the brief, not hope. The lever on a crowdsourcing contest is the brief: be
specific (audience, style references, colors, what to avoid), give prompt feedback/ratings to steer the crowd,
and consider an upgrade (top designers / higher budget) to attract stronger entries. A vague brief is the #1
cause of "the designs were all bad."
Contest vs 1-to-1 — pick by how much exploration you want. A contest maximizes variety (many directions
fast); a 1-to-1 project (hire one designer directly) maximizes depth/iteration. Suggest a contest for
exploration/early brand, 1-to-1 for a refined revision with someone specific.
There is NO self-serve public API — don't plan a pipeline around it. It's a human-in-the-loop marketplace
with no documented REST endpoints, no webhooks, no Zapier/Make, no MCP. The white-label/wholesale program
(rebranded pages/PDFs/emails for agencies reselling design) and the affiliate program are reseller/partner
programs, not an automation API — don't conflate them or invent endpoints. For programmatic generation at
volume, use an image-generation service with a documented API; DesignCrowd is for human, custom, one-off work.
If you discover a gotcha or tip not in references/learnings.md, append it there with today's date.
Gotchas
Best-effort from research (2026-07) — pricing/fees/guarantee terms move and sources conflict; the live pricing page
404'd to automated fetch, so figures came from third-party pricing writeups + reviews. Verify at designcrowd.com.
It's human crowdsourcing, not AI/DIY — say this first. You pay real designers to compete; the payoff is custom
work + ownership, the cost is money/time/variable quality. Not the tool for a free or instant logo.
Three charges stack, and the posting fee is non-refundable. Package ($109–$739) + a non-refundable posting
fee (~$29–$129) + a ~4% fee, plus optional upgrades ($30–$150). The posting fee is spent at launch.
The money-back guarantee excludes the posting fee, the ~4% fee, and guaranteed projects. This carve-out is the
#1 billing complaint (~1.7★ consumer reviews). Refund window reported 30 or 60 days — confirm live.
You get full copyright + source files — but not a cleared trademark, and not guaranteed originality. Run a
reverse-image search on the winning design and a USPTO/EUIPO clearance before relying on the mark;
crowdsourced entries have a real plagiarism risk.
A vague brief is why the designs were bad. Specific brief + prompt feedback + (optional) a top-designers upgrade is the fix, not re-launching.
NO self-serve API, webhooks, Zapier/Make, or MCP. The white-label/wholesale + affiliate programs are
reseller/partner, not automation — don't invent endpoints. For volume generation, use an image-generation API.
Related skills
/sales-namelix — Generate the business name first (design is the hand-off from the name)
/sales-hatchwise — The other big contest marketplace — but with ALL-INCLUSIVE pricing ("no hidden fees," the tier price IS the winner's prize) instead of DesignCrowd's stacked posting fee + ~4% fee; also runs naming contests. The direct comparison for a buyer weighing contest sites
/sales-idea-validation — The validate-before-building method and the full naming/branding landscape (validate and name before you pay real designers to brand it; also covers ownership-vs-trademark and print-readiness)
/sales-namecheap-logo-maker — The free DIY peer that even gives free vector SVG — the go-to when you want a logo without paying a human contest (DesignCrowd is custom human work you pay for)
/sales-hatchful — A free DIY logo maker (free PNG) — contrast with DesignCrowd's paid human contest; use it when a fast placeholder is enough
/sales-design-com — DesignCrowd's OWN AI subsidiary/successor (sister to BrandCrowd) — the same company's AI/DIY subscription brand kit; if someone says "DesignCrowd's AI tool," that's the skill they want
/sales-designevo — A cheap one-time AI/template logo maker (~$25–$50) — contrast the per-logo cost of a DIY tool vs a $100s+ human crowdsourcing contest
/sales-canva — Once the design's done, build the wider marketing/social creative and design system at scale
/sales-do — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do -a claude-code
Examples
Example 1: "Is DesignCrowd free? How much does a logo actually cost?" (model / pricing)
User says: "I want a logo on DesignCrowd — it looks cheap. What will I actually pay?"
Skill does: Explains it's a human crowdsourcing contest (you pay upfront, designers compete), not a
free/DIY tool. Breaks cost into package ($109–$739) + a NON-REFUNDABLE posting fee ($29–$129) + a ~4% fee, plus
optional upgrades (~$30–$150); notes higher packages buy more designs/designers, not different ownership, and
the posting fee is spent at launch (excluded from the guarantee). Flags figures best-effort → designcrowd.com;
if they wanted free/instant, points to /sales-hatchful or /sales-namecheap-logo-maker.
Result: The user sees the three stacked charges and picks a contest budget — or switches to a free DIY tool.
Example 2: "I won my contest — is the logo mine, and how do I know it isn't stolen?" (ownership / plagiarism / references)
User says: "My DesignCrowd contest is done. Do I own the logo, and could the designer have copied it?"
Skill does: Confirms the winner transfers full copyright + professional/source files (a real edge over
shared-template makers), but warns copyright transfer ≠ a registered trademark and crowdsourced entries carry
a plagiarism/stock-tracing risk — so before relying on the mark, run a reverse-image search on the winning
design + a USPTO/EUIPO clearance, and grab the domain + handles.
Result: The user secures the files, verifies originality, and plans proper trademark clearance.
Example 3: "How do I call the DesignCrowd API to launch contests from my app?" (developer/automation)
User says: "Is there a DesignCrowd API so I can create briefs and pull finished files programmatically?"
Skill does: States DesignCrowd has no self-serve public API — a human-in-the-loop marketplace with no
documented REST endpoints, webhooks, Zapier/Make, or MCP, so contests cannot be scripted; clarifies the
white-label/wholesale and affiliate programs are reseller/partner, not automation, and doesn't invent
endpoints. For programmatic generation at volume, suggests an image-generation service with a documented API.
Result: The user avoids building on a nonexistent API and picks a workable path.
Troubleshooting
"DesignCrowd looked cheap but I was charged extra fees"
Symptom: The final charge was higher than the package price you expected.
Cause: A project is package + a non-refundable posting fee (~$29–$129) + a ~4% project fee, plus any
upgrades you added (top designers / private / express, ~$30–$150). The package price alone isn't the total.
Solution: Before launching, add up all three parts + upgrades. The posting fee is non-refundable and
spent at launch, so decide on upgrades up front. Confirm current figures at designcrowd.com (best-effort).
"I asked for a refund and they kept part of my money"
Symptom: You invoked the money-back guarantee but didn't get everything back.
Cause: The guarantee refunds the project budget only — it excludes the posting fee and the ~4% fee, and
"guaranteed" projects are excluded entirely (refund window reported 30 or 60 days — sources conflict).
Solution: Expect the posting fee + 4% fee to be non-refundable. Check whether you chose a guaranteed
project (no refund). Request the refund within the window and keep records; verify the current policy on-site.
"The designs I got were low quality / all looked bad"
Symptom: The competing entries were weak, generic, or off-brief.
Cause: On a crowdsourcing contest, entry quality tracks the brief and the incentive — a vague brief or low
budget attracts weaker entries; quality also varies designer-to-designer.
Solution: Tighten the brief (audience, style references, colors, what to avoid), give prompt
feedback/ratings to steer the crowd mid-contest, and consider an upgrade (top designers / higher budget); or use
a 1-to-1 project for depth with one designer. (Is-there-an-API? see Example 3 / Step 4 — UI-only; use an image-generation API for volume.)
