my-analyze

model	opus
name	my-analyze
description	Compare research, specs, plans, and related artifacts to find contradictions, coverage gaps, scope drift, and implementation-readiness risks.

Analyze

Audit consistency across artifacts before implementation. This is not a code review; it checks whether the written plan still matches the research, spec, decisions, and constraints.

Load Rules

Read:

• ~/.claude/rules/question-policy.md
• ~/.claude/rules/context-checkpoint.md

Use ~/.agents/rules/ when running through Codex. For complex multi-artifact comparisons or workflow-stage runs, read references/protocol-index.md.

Flow

1. Resolve artifacts from $ARGUMENTS, workflow ledger, or recent research/spec/plan directories.
2. Require at least two artifacts; if only one exists, recommend my-clarify.
3. Read artifacts fully and ledger decisions.
4. Compare:
   • research findings vs spec claims
   • spec acceptance criteria vs plan phases
   • non-goals vs proposed implementation
   • risks vs validation strategy
   • assumptions vs unresolved decisions
5. Classify gaps as blocking, important, or minor.
6. Save report when appropriate and append path to workflow ledger.

Output

Return consistency findings with artifact references, why each matters, recommended fix, and whether implementation should proceed.