fixup-commit
Creates a fixup commit and performs autosquash rebase
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Menü
Creates a fixup commit and performs autosquash rebase
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
| name | fixup-commit |
| description | Creates a fixup commit and performs autosquash rebase |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
指定した対象コミットに対して fixup コミットを作成し、autosquash 付きの対話的リベースを実行する。
fixup 対象のコミットハッシュ。
$ARGUMENTS
引数が提供されていない場合、対象コミットハッシュをユーザーに確認する。
git status
git diff
git diff --cached
git log --oneline -10
git log --format="%H %s" -1 <target-commit>
次の情報を表示し、ユーザーの承認を得る:
Fixup Commit Plan:
Target commit: <commit-hash>
Commit message: <commit-message>
Files to be included in fixup:
- <file1>
- <file2>
- ...
This will:
1. Stage all changes (if not already staged)
2. Create a fixup commit for the target
3. Run interactive rebase with autosquash
Proceed? (y/n)
重要: 明示的な承認 (y) を待ってから進めること。
ユーザー承認後:
git add -A
git commit --fixup=<target-commit>
# Show rebase plan (for verification)
GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="cat" git rebase -i --autosquash main --no-edit 2>/dev/null || true
# Execute rebase with autosquash
git rebase -i --autosquash main
git log --oneline -10
Generic thinking protocol for deriving optimal solutions through iterative self-checking. Invoke BEFORE searching within the given problem space whenever the user asks for advice, judgment, evaluation, or choice. Reframes the problem, generates options, evaluates trade-offs, runs a self-answer check (does this answer the user's actual question at the right granularity, reach upstream, match expectations, offer non-obvious value?), and loops back to upstream tracing or same-level reframing if the check fails — until convergence. Applies across any domain — technical, process, organizational, decision-making, career. Triggers when the user uses evaluation or reconsideration language ("which is best", "root cause", "is this really needed", "sustainable long-term", "ほんとうに", "そもそも", "最善は", "根本は", "筋が良い"), when validating the soundness of someone's proposal from multiple perspectives, when the problem spans multiple layers (tech / process / org / regulation / UX / cost), or when clear trade-offs exist.
Review the local diff with flat-perspective sub-agents, fix findings in a loop, then create a PR via the create-pr skill once the review is clean
計画や設計について、ユーザーを徹底的に問い詰めて一緒に詰める。実装・着手の前に計画をストレステストしたいとき、または「詰めて」「グリルして」「問い詰めて」「ツッコんで」「設計レビューして」「ほんとうにこれでいい?」などのトリガー表現が出たときに必ず使う。
.claude/rules/ 配下のルールファイル (*.md) を新規作成・編集するときに、適切なメカニズム選択と paths スコープを保証する。ルールを書く前・書いた後に必ず適用する。
Orchestrate Epic issue as team leader. Delegate sub-issues to member agents in isolated worktrees. Members run in background and communicate via SendMessage.
Fetch a GitHub issue with its sub-issues, walk up to the parent Epic, list sibling issues under that Epic, fetch the body of each sibling issue, attach the implementing PR for each closed sibling with body and diff summary, gather related code, and present as a Japanese summary so the reader can grasp the whole task context including the actual contents of siblings and their PRs