| name | review |
| description | Findings-first pre-landing review against code, plan completion, verification evidence, and durable runtime state. |
Review
Purpose
Use $review to answer one question: is this actually ready to land? Review is not a summary pass. It is a bug, regression, coverage, and state-integrity pass.
Execution Policy
- Findings first, summary second.
- Prefer evidence over author claims.
- Check the code, the tests, the plan, and the runtime artifacts.
- If the current context authored the change, prefer a separate reviewer role for approval.
Review Order
- Read the changed code.
- Read the active plan and verification map.
- Check what was supposed to happen vs what actually landed.
- Verify:
- tests and typechecks
- docs drift
.omx/ state drift
- task/review/inbox accuracy
- Produce a verdict:
- approved
- changes requested
- blocked
Mandatory Checks
- missing or fake verification
- uncovered changed paths
- stale docs or setup instructions
- task marked done but still pending review evidence
- team runtime claiming health while inbox or review queue says otherwise
Output Standard
- findings ordered by severity
- file references and why they matter
- residual risk
- final verdict and next action