question-me

name	question-me
description	Resolve material decisions with evidence-first questions when explicit or delegated by $he-plan.

Question Me

Boundary

• Evidence = current state; user = desired state.
• Research objective gaps only; never plan/implement.
• Never infer material outcome/UX/default/policy/security/privacy/data-loss/irreversible intent.
• Reversible engineering detail = agent-owned + excluded from the decision inventory.
• Delegated scope = exact Feature Brief alignment boundary.

Route

Invocation	Load	Completion
Feature Brief alignment delegated by $he-plan	feature-brief.md	Material decisions settled + readiness returned
Direct question request	direct.md	Every material decision accounted

Admission

• Decision status = settled | objective-gap | user-decision | contradiction.
• Inspect available code/tests/schema/contracts/config/history/runtime/notes; objective gap → bounded $research first.
• Ask only desired intent + priority + scope + success + trade-off + unresolved evidence conflict.
• Current behavior may be accidental → ask whether to preserve it.
• Recorded answer → reuse; contradiction → show claims/evidence → request resolution.
• Dependent → one question; independent → one bounded batch; choice → 2–3 exclusive consequences + Other.
• Unlimited material questions; zero repeated, speculative, or downstream-premature questions.

Question

• Every user-facing question = one bullet; dependent decisions never share a bullet.

### Evidence
- <verified current fact + path/URL>

### Unresolved
- <decision or contradiction>

### Why it matters
- <material consequence>

### Questions
- **Q1. <one clear question>?**
  - **Option 1:** <choice + consequence>
  - **Option 2:** <choice + consequence>
  - **Other:** <unlisted choice>

### Recommendation
- **Option:** <recommended choice>
- **Reason:** <evidence-backed reason>
- **Trade-off:** <cost>
- **Status:** Awaiting approval.

• Omit options when the answer is inherently open-ended.
• Recommendation = unapproved until explicit acceptance.
• Ambiguous/partial answer → record confirmed portion only → ask the smallest unresolved remainder.
• User correction changing accepted outcome/risk → restate exact delta + downstream impact before continuing.
• Clear correction to reversible engineering detail → record + continue without approval.

Return

• Direct invocation → verified facts + accepted/delegated decisions + pending decisions + contradictions + assumptions requiring confirmation + next question.
• Complete only when every material unknown is approved, delegated, proven irrelevant, or explicitly deferred with consequence.
• Any unresolved material decision → CONCERNS; never claim alignment.