| name | spawn-team |
| description | Structured flow for a team lead to assemble a Claude Code agent team. 6 phases: task decomposition → lineup proposal (selected from role_archetypes) → plan-mode gating → adversarial check → user confirmation → spawn each teammate via the Agent tool (name must be <slug>-<role>; permission mode inherits the lead, not set per-teammate at spawn) + save team_recipe. After Phase 5 user confirmation, Phase 6 spawns immediately with no additional confirmation. The agent can invoke autonomously; if currently a flat workstation, it will first guide through /promote-to-team.
|
| disable-model-invocation | false |
| allowed-tools | Read Write Edit Glob Grep Agent |
| mode | interactive |
/spawn-team — Structured Agent Team Assembly
This skill helps a team lead decompose a complex task into a team lineup, then spawn each teammate via the Agent tool (with the name parameter).
⚠️ Teammate vs subagent: when calling the Agent tool, you must pass the name parameter to create a real teammate (one that joins the current session-level team and can exchange messages); without name you only get a regular subagent. name must be of the form <slug>-<role> and globally unique (see the Phase 3 naming convention).
About team_name (CC ≥2.1.178): do not pass team_name anymore — that parameter is now ignored. Each session auto-creates a unique session-level team at startup, and Agent(name=…) auto-joins the teammate into it; the teammate is auto-cleaned on exit.
mode field: currently only interactive is supported. A future autonomous mode will work with /loop for end-to-end automation, driven by a higher-capability model.
Identity precheck
First infer from conversation context: if you're already clear whether you're a team lead or a flat workstation, use it directly.
Only if unable to infer do the on-disk check:
- Locate the workstation directory corresponding to the current conversation
- Check whether the directory name ends with
_team AND has a roundtable/ subdirectory
Currently a flat workstation
Do not directly execute the spawn-team flow; instead:
- Explain to the user: "I'm currently a flat workstation; I need to first promote to team lead before assembling a team"
- Ask the user: "I suggest running
/promote-to-team first to upgrade, then we can come back to /spawn-team. Do you agree?"
- After natural-language user consent, the agent autonomously invokes
/promote-to-team
- After promotion, return to Phase 1 of this flow
Currently a team lead
Proceed directly to Phase 1.
Phase 1: Task context collection
Extract the task description the user gave from conversation context. If info is incomplete, ask the user follow-up questions:
- Goal: what is this task meant to achieve? What is the success criterion?
- Input: which existing files/data/code/prior outputs can we use?
- Output: in what form is the final artifact? Written where?
- Timing: is there a deadline? One-off or long-running?
- Constraints: what can't be touched? What rules must be followed?
- Risks: which step are you most worried will fail?
Organize answers into a structured task description as input to Phase 2.
Phase 2: Task decomposition
Break the task into parallel or sequenced sub-work-items. For each sub-item annotate:
- Type: write code / write config / environment config / container build / analysis / investigation / review / adversarial challenge / result reporting
- Dependencies: which other sub-items must complete first
- Parallelism: which sub-items can run concurrently
- Estimated context consumption (lead's judgment): high / medium / low
Key principle (rule 12): the lead does not do hands-on work. All hands-on sub-items go to teammates.
Phase 3: Lineup proposal
Consult the following resources:
- General subagents (
resources/agents/): tracker, investigator, reviewer, devil-advocate, git-repo-manager
- Role archetypes (
resources/role_archetypes/): coding (3) + config (2) + infra (2) + analysis (2)
- This team's existing custom teammates (
<SELF>_team/teammates/*.md): Tier 2 archive
Based on Phase 2 decomposition, assemble a 3–5 person team (max 5—more causes coordination cost to explode; if more than 5 are needed, explain why).
For each teammate output:
- Role name (
name, must be of the form <slug>-<role>, globally unique):
slug = this team's workstation name minus the _team suffix, a single token (no -/_). E.g. team workstation architect_team → slug architect.role = a short name for the teammate's responsibility, may contain hyphens. E.g. reviewer, plan-a-author.- Joined:
architect-reviewer, architect-plan-a-author.
- ⚠️ This naming is load-bearing: the idle checkpoint hook derives the workstation back from the name via
${name%%-*}_team (the slug must be a single token with no hyphen for the hook to split it correctly). Legacy nicknames (Fixer, Tracker) are tolerated only for existing teammates; every new spawn must use <slug>-<role>.
- Role source:
- Reference a general subagent (Claude Code auto-loads; specify by name at spawn)
- Reference a role archetype (fill the archetype markdown content into the spawn prompt, add project-specific details)
- Reference a team Tier 2 archive
- Fully original inline persona
- Model choice:
haiku (fast/cheap, good for mechanical polling, small edits) / sonnet (default, good for most coding/review) / opus (expensive, good for deep-reasoning architectural design)
- Plan-mode gating: YES means the teammate enters read-only plan mode first and submits a plan for lead approval before implementing; NO means direct execution
- Scope: which files/directories it can touch; forbidden list
- Deliverables: what this teammate must produce at the end (code / report / config / test results …)
Plan-mode gating decision principles
- Requires modifying core files or multi-file refactor → YES
- Result will affect other teammates' work → YES
- Single-file local edits, test scripts, read-only analysis → NO
- Adversarial review (devil-advocate / reviewer) → NO (read-only by nature)
Phase 4: Adversarial check (optional but recommended)
If the task is complex with unclear direction (e.g. no existing baseline, counterintuitive investigation results, architectural choice), suggest:
- Add a devil-advocate teammate to the team with explicit instruction to "find holes, challenge the plan, list failure paths, but do not veto—after exposing blind spots, decision authority returns to the lead"
- For investigations requiring "competing hypotheses", open 2-3 investigator teammates each holding different initial hypotheses and let them challenge each other (note: this significantly increases token consumption)
If the task path is clear (e.g. "rewrite this model's forward to support flash-attn"), do not add devil-advocate; proceed to Phase 5.
Phase 5: Display lineup to user + collect feedback
Show the full proposal to the user:
# Team Proposal — <task summary>
## Task decomposition
1. [Sub-item A] - deps: none, parallel with: B
2. [Sub-item B] - deps: none, parallel with: A
3. [Sub-item C] - deps: A, B
...
## Lineup (N members)
### Teammate 1: <nickname> — <source: subagent_name / role_archetype/xxx.md>
- Model: sonnet
- Plan-mode gating: YES (reason: ...)
- Scope: ...
- Forbidden: ...
- Deliverables: ...
### Teammate 2: ...
...
## Execution flow
- Phase 1 (parallel): Teammate 1 + Teammate 2 start
- Phase 2 (sequential): after Teammate 1/2 finish → Teammate 3 takes over
- Phase 3 (review): Reviewer reviews all outputs
Do you agree with this lineup? What to adjust (add/remove teammate, change model, change scope, change source)?
Iterate: adjust per user feedback until explicit user agreement. Do not pretend the user agreed—rule #11: when in doubt, ask.
Phase 6: Spawn Team + Save Recipe
6a. Prepare a spawn prompt for each teammate
For each teammate in the Phase 5 final lineup, prepare a separate prompt string containing:
You are <nickname>, a teammate on <team_name>.
## Role definition
<archetype content / referenced subagent persona / original inline persona>
## Current task
Goal: <specific task description>
Scope: <files/directories you may touch>
No-go zones: <files/directories strictly off-limits>
Deliverables: <what to produce when done>
Plan-mode gating: <yes/no; if yes, explain approval criteria>
## Collaboration
- Important milestones, completion notices, blockers → write to _agent_team_work_zone/<SELF>_team/roundtable/
frontmatter must include a kind field (TASK / DONE / ERR)
- Need to reach another teammate or the lead → use Claude Code's built-in mailbox (SendMessage)
## Workstation & persistence (Rule 13)
Your workstation: _agent_team_work_zone/<SELF>_team/teammates/<nickname>/
The lead has initialized 5 skeleton files (README / working-context.md / completed.md / TODO.md / commitments.md).
Before going idle, when prompted, and after task completion → call /checkpoint to update working-context.md.
This is the only bridge for recovering your state across sessions (Claude Code does not preserve teammate sessions).
If your workstation README has an old full rules section (heading matches `## Work Rules` or
`## 工作守则`, and it is NOT inside a <!-- TEAMMATE_RULES:START --> block), replace that old
section (from that heading through the next `## ` heading of the same level, or through end
of file — heading included) with the content of _agent_team_work_zone/resources/teammate_rules.md;
otherwise, if your workstation README has no <!-- TEAMMATE_RULES:START --> block, copy that
block from the same file and append it to the end of your own README (you may only edit your
own file).
6b. Initialize each teammate's workstation skeleton
For each teammate in the Phase 5 final version, create the workstation directory and 5 skeleton files (the 5 teammate self-maintained files mandated by Rule 13):
Path: _agent_team_work_zone/<SELF>_team/teammates/<teammate-name>/
6c. Write / update TEAMMATE_INFO.json
Path: _agent_team_work_zone/<SELF>_team/TEAMMATE_INFO.json
If the file already exists (team has previously run spawn-team), do not overwrite; append new members to active_teammates instead. If this is the first spawn-team or the file doesn't exist, initialize per schema v1 (see docs/teammate_info_schema.md).
Each new teammate's entry:
{
"name": "<teammate-name>",
"role_source": { "type": "...", "path": "..." },
"model": "<haiku|sonnet|opus>",
"plan_mode_gating": <true|false>,
"scope": "<scope summary>",
"spawned_at": "<ISO8601 current time>",
"last_checkpoint_at": null,
"revived_count": 0,
"status": "active"
}
Also update the top-level updated_at.
6d. Save team recipe audit record
Save the full spawn prompt + task context + lineup design to:
_agent_team_work_zone/<SELF>_team/team_recipes/<YYYYMMDD_HHMM>_<slug>.md
Format:
---
created: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
lead: <SELF>
task: <one-sentence task summary>
team_size: N
mode: interactive
---
# Team Recipe: <slug>
## Task context
<Phase 1 collection result>
## Task decomposition
<Phase 2 result>
## Lineup
<Phase 3 + Phase 5 final version>
## Adversarial check
<Phase 4: added devil-advocate / competing hypotheses? why>
## Spawn prompts (per teammate)
<Phase 6a prompt for each teammate>
## Notes
<Any experience worth reusing in future teams>
6e. Spawn each teammate via the Agent tool
Phase 5 user confirmation is the final authorization — do not ask again; start spawning immediately.
Call the Agent tool for each teammate:
Agent(
description="Spawn <name>: <one-line role>",
subagent_type="<see selection rules below>",
model="<haiku|sonnet|opus>", # from Phase 3 decision
name="<slug>-<role>", # ← required; without this it's just a subagent; must be <slug>-<role>, matching the workstation directory name
prompt="<prompt prepared for this teammate in 6a>"
)
CC ≥2.1.178: do not pass team_name (it is ignored). The teammate is auto-joined into the current session-level team by Agent(name=…).
Also do not pass mode: a teammate's permission mode cannot be set per-teammate at spawn — it inherits the lead's current permission mode (see "Permission mode vs teammateMode" below).
subagent_type selection rules:
role_source.type == "subagent" → subagent_type = role_source.subagent_name (e.g. "tracker", "reviewer")role_source.type == "archetype" / "tier2" / "inline" → subagent_type = "general-purpose" (role injected via prompt)
Spawn order: follow execution dependencies — teammates that can run in parallel may be spawned together in a single message with multiple Agent calls; those with ordering dependencies spawn sequentially.
After all spawns complete, output a brief confirmation:
✅ teammates/ workstation skeletons created (N teammates × 5 files)
✅ TEAMMATE_INFO.json initialized/appended (N active_teammates)
✅ team_recipes/<timestamp>_<slug>.md saved
✅ Team spawned: <nickname1>, <nickname2>... — standing by for first task
Terminal / tmux (only read if a spawn reports a tmux error, or you want to tune display/persistence)
tmux is not a requirement for agent teams — in-process mode runs the full team feature set in any terminal. This section is only relevant if you hit the errors below, or want to change display/persistence; the normal spawn flow needs none of it.
What the two tmux spawn errors mean (the hard version/environment check is handled by bootstrap.sh; this skill does not run checks itself):
Failed to create teammate pane: size invalid → you're inside tmux, but the tmux version is too old (< 3.0). Upgrade tmux ≥ 3.0 (3.6a verified), or exit tmux and use in-process.Could not determine current tmux pane/window → the tmux on PATH differs from the one owning the current session ($TMUX socket) — multiple tmux installs coexist. Point PATH at the tmux that started the current session.- bootstrap pre-empts and diagnoses both once you're inside tmux — if you see one, re-run bootstrap and follow its guidance.
Permission mode vs teammateMode (two different things, don't conflate):
- Permission mode (
default / acceptEdits / auto / plan / bypassPermissions): controls whether the teammate prompts for permission on tool calls. A teammate inherits the lead's permission mode at spawn — official docs state per-teammate modes cannot be set at spawn time (Agent(mode=…) has no effect on a teammate's permission mode). To start teammates in auto mode, put the lead itself in auto (Shift+Tab, or set permissions.defaultMode:"auto" in settings.json so the lead starts in auto and teammates inherit it); after spawn you can only change modes per-teammate by hand.
teammateMode (a settings.json field): controls only how the teammate is displayed in the terminal (pane-split vs in-process); nothing to do with permissions.
teammateMode (display mode, a settings.json field):
| Value | Behavior |
|---|
in-process | all teammates in the main terminal; ↑↓ to navigate + Enter to view/message; works in any terminal. Default (since CC v2.1.179) |
auto | inside a tmux session or iTerm2 → split panes; otherwise falls back to in-process |
tmux | enables split panes; auto-detects whether to use tmux or iTerm2 |
iterm2 (CC v2.1.186+) | explicitly use iTerm2 native split panes (requires it2 CLI) |
teammateMode is a user-level setting (~/.claude/settings.json); you can also use --teammate-mode to override for a single session; split panes require tmux or iTerm2.- Want split panes → use
auto (inside tmux/iTerm2) or tmux; idle teammates stay visible: one independent pane per teammate, so you can see who is working, stuck, or idle at a glance.
- Don't want panes split → use
in-process (works in any terminal, no loss of functionality). Don't hand-edit settings.json — re-run bootstrap.sh's "display mode selection" menu (it writes to the global ~/.claude/settings.json). See the tmux section of docs/user_manual.md.
Notes
- Rule 12 applies throughout: the lead does not do hands-on work; complex tasks must be teamed, not done solo
- Max 5: beyond that coordination overhead spikes significantly
- Dialogue is the black box: the user interacts with the lead in natural language only;
/spawn-team is invoked autonomously by the agent, and the user doesn't need to memorize commands
- Team recipe is a reusable asset: for future similar tasks, the lead can first check
team_recipes/ for precedent
- Agent tool must carry
name (<slug>-<role>): without name you only get a regular subagent that cannot join the team or exchange messages; team_name is ignored on CC ≥2.1.178 — don't pass it. Phase 5 user agreement = final authorization — call Agent directly, no second confirmation
mode: interactive annotation: the frontmatter position is reserved; when switching to autonomous in the future, extend this file's Phase 7 (start /loop + hook)
