Package conversation research into a GSD-ready mission package. Produces a three-stage Vision → Research → Mission pipeline as a LaTeX PDF following GSD/NASA SE methodology, designed to be handed to gsd-skill-creator for execution. Use this skill when the user has been discussing, researching, or brainstorming a topic and then asks to turn it into a research mission, research pack, mission package, or says 'package this as a mission', 'make this a research pack', 'turn this into a mission for skill-creator', 'create a research mission from this', or 'use the research mission skill'. The skill harvests findings, sources, and structure from the current conversation and any prior research, then produces the complete pipeline document. Also trigger if the user asks to 'create a research mission on [topic]' cold — in that case, conduct web research first, then package.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Package conversation research into a GSD-ready mission package. Produces a three-stage Vision → Research → Mission pipeline as a LaTeX PDF following GSD/NASA SE methodology, designed to be handed to gsd-skill-creator for execution. Use this skill when the user has been discussing, researching, or brainstorming a topic and then asks to turn it into a research mission, research pack, mission package, or says 'package this as a mission', 'make this a research pack', 'turn this into a mission for skill-creator', 'create a research mission from this', or 'use the research mission skill'. The skill harvests findings, sources, and structure from the current conversation and any prior research, then produces the complete pipeline document. Also trigger if the user asks to 'create a research mission on [topic]' cold — in that case, conduct web research first, then package.
version
1.0.0
format
"2025-10-02T00:00:00.000Z"
triggers
["the user has been discussing, researching, or brainstorming a topic and then asks to turn it into a research mission, research pack, or mission package, or says 'package this as a mission'","if the user asks to 'create a research mission on [topic]' cold — in that case, conduct web research first, then package"]
updated
"2026-04-25T00:00:00.000Z"
status
ACTIVE
Research Mission Generator
Package conversation research into publication-quality GSD mission packages. Produces a three-stage pipeline (Vision → Research → Mission) as a LaTeX PDF, ready for handoff to gsd-skill-creator.
Primary Workflow
The typical pattern is:
User has a conversation — discussion, brainstorming, web research, thinking time, or any exploration of a topic
User says "turn this into a research mission" — triggering this skill
Skill harvests the conversation — extracting findings, sources, structure, and insights already developed
Skill fills gaps — conducting additional web research only where the conversation left holes
Skill produces the package — three-stage LaTeX PDF + .tex source + index.html
User hands package to gsd-skill-creator — for execution via Claude Code
The skill is a structuring and packaging tool, not a from-scratch generator. The intellectual work has already happened in conversation. This skill gives it bones.
When to Use
Primary triggers (conversation already happened):
"Turn this into a research mission"
"Package this as a mission for skill-creator"
"Make this a research pack"
"Use the research mission skill on what we've discussed"
"Create a mission package from this conversation"
"Structure this for GSD"
Secondary trigger (cold start — research needed first):
"Create a research mission on [topic]"
"I want a deep research study into [topic]"
In this case, conduct 3–6 web searches first (see Step 2b below), then proceed with packaging.
Workflow
Step 1: Harvest the Conversation
Scan the current conversation (and any referenced past conversations) to extract:
Element
Where to Find It
Fallback
Topic & scope
User's original question or framing
Ask user
Key findings
Research results, web search outputs, discussion points
Conduct web research
Sources cited
URLs, papers, organizations mentioned in conversation
Validate via web search
Structure
Natural groupings that emerged in discussion
Infer modules from topic
Quantitative data
Numbers, percentages, measurements discussed
Source from research
Sensitivity areas
Cultural, safety, or ethical concerns raised
Detect from domain
Insights & connections
Cross-topic relationships the user identified
Preserve in synthesis module
User's framing
Metaphors, analogies, philosophical angles
Carry into vision narrative and through-line
Critical: Preserve the user's own insights, framings, and connections. The conversation is the primary source material. Don't replace the user's thinking with generic content — amplify it with structure.
Step 2a: Gap Analysis (Conversation-Based)
After harvesting, identify what's missing for a complete three-stage package:
Vision gaps: Is there a clear problem statement? Are there enough concrete problems (need 3–5)?
Research gaps: Are all claims sourced? Are there modules with thin evidence?
Mission gaps: Can the topic decompose into 4–6 parallelizable modules?
Conduct targeted web searches ONLY to fill identified gaps. Don't re-research what the conversation already covered well.
Step 2b: Cold-Start Research (Topic-Only)
If the user provides just a topic without prior conversation, conduct full research:
Read references/latex-template.md for the complete document template, color scheme selection, and formatting patterns. Read it before writing any LaTeX.
The template includes:
Domain-adaptive color schemes (ecology=green/blue/brown, tech=steel/electric/graphite, etc.)
Title page, TOC, headers/footers with page counts
Stage header banners (\stageheader)
ASCII diagram boxes (asciibox environment)
Alternating-row tables with colored headers
Quote boxes for closing through-line
Full document skeleton showing every section
Three stages in one document:
Stage 1: Vision Guide — Narrative vision (use the user's own framing and metaphors), problem statement (3–5 problems), core concept, study region/architecture (ASCII diagrams), module descriptions, chipset configuration, scope boundaries, 8–12 success criteria, relationship to other GSD vision docs, through-line connecting to ecosystem philosophy
Stage 2: Research Reference — Source organizations, detailed findings per module (harvested from conversation + gap-fill research), quantitative data with citations, safety/sensitivity considerations, complete source bibliography
Stage 3: Mission Package — Milestone spec, deliverables table, component breakdown with model assignments, wave execution plan with parallel tracks, cache optimization strategy, dependency graph (ASCII), test plan (safety-critical + core + integration + edge cases), verification matrix mapping criteria to tests, crew manifest, execution summary
Produce both the PDF and .tex source so the user can modify and recompile.
Step 6: Create Index Page
Generate index.html with:
Header reflecting the topic's color scheme
File cards with slightly darker backgrounds, clickable as download links (<a href="..." download>)
Contents breakdown listing all three stages
Usage instructions (how to feed to GSD/skill-creator)
LaTeX recompilation instructions
Step 7: Deliver
Present all three files (PDF, .tex, index.html). Keep the summary brief — the user can read the document themselves.
Conversation Harvesting Patterns
Preserving User Voice
The vision narrative should echo the user's own language, metaphors, and philosophical framing. If the user described the topic with a particular analogy during conversation, that analogy should appear in the Vision section. The through-line should connect to the GSD ecosystem philosophy (Amiga Principle, spaces between, humane flow) in a way that feels natural to the domain.
Thinking Time Sessions
If the conversation included "thinking time" sessions (user describing complex thought processes while Claude listens), the insights from those sessions are the highest-priority content for the vision and synthesis modules. These represent the user's original thinking and should be preserved with fidelity.
Multi-Conversation Continuity
If the user references past conversations about the topic, use the conversation search tools to retrieve relevant context. The mission package should integrate findings across sessions, not just the current one.
Research Already Done
If web searches were already conducted during the conversation, extract the findings and sources directly — don't re-search the same queries. Only search for gaps.
Quality Checks
Before delivering, verify:
Conversation insights are faithfully represented (not replaced with generic content)
Vision narrative uses the user's own framing and metaphors where possible
Problem statement has 3–5 concrete, recognizable problems
Success criteria are testable (8–12 criteria, each observable and specific)
All sources are professional organizations or peer-reviewed research
Wave plan maximizes parallelism with correct dependency ordering
Model assignments follow 30/60/10 Opus/Sonnet/Haiku split
Test plan has 2–4 tests per success criterion
Safety-critical tests are marked mandatory-pass / BLOCK
Each component spec is self-contained
LaTeX compiles without errors (three passes)
Through-line connects to GSD ecosystem philosophy
Sensitivity considerations addressed for the domain
Package is ready for handoff to gsd-skill-creator with zero additional context
Safety Boundaries
These apply to ALL research missions regardless of topic:
Rule
Boundary Type
All sources must be professional organizations, peer-reviewed, or government agencies
ABSOLUTE
Never publish precise locations of endangered species
ABSOLUTE
Use nation-specific names for Indigenous peoples (never generic)
ABSOLUTE
Climate/health projections from published agency data only
GATE
All numerical claims attributed to specific sources
GATE
Present evidence without policy advocacy
ANNOTATE
Reference Files
references/latex-template.md — Complete XeLaTeX document template with domain-adaptive color schemes, typography, table styles, tcolorbox environments, section formatting, and full document skeleton. Read this before generating any LaTeX.
references/crew-profiles.md — Activation profiles (Patrol/Squadron/Fleet) with complete role assignments, CRAFT agent naming conventions, and communication loop architecture.
references/test-patterns.md — Test plan templates, universal safety-critical tests, and domain-specific test patterns for core functionality, integration, and edge cases.
Ecosystem Patterns
This skill implements these GSD ecosystem patterns:
Mission Control Pattern — Each component spec is a complete flight plan
Safety Warden Pattern — Safety-critical tests are mandatory-pass gates
Progressive Disclosure — Three reading speeds (glance/scan/read) in all output
Amiga Principle — Architectural leverage over brute-force research
Humane Flow — Research supports understanding, never overwhelms
Example Invocations
After a conversation (primary use):
"OK, turn this into a research mission"
"Package what we've discussed as a mission for skill-creator"
"Make a research pack from this conversation"
"Use the research mission generator on everything we've covered"
"Structure this for GSD and give me the PDF"
Cold start (secondary use):
"Create a research mission on coral reef bleaching in the Great Barrier Reef"
"I want a deep research study into urban heat island effects"
"Research mission: the neuroscience of musical perception"
