| name | git-history-cleanup |
| description | Collapse many WIP / fix-to-fix commits on a feature branch into a small set of topic-focused commits. Reads the original commit messages first so intent is preserved, soft-resets to origin/main so intermediate / overwritten changes drop out automatically, then re-commits the accumulated diff one logical topic at a time. Use before opening a PR or merging when `git log origin/main..HEAD` looks noisy. |
Git history cleanup
Collapse origin/main..HEAD into a small number of topic-focused commits without losing intent. Changes that were introduced in one commit and rewritten or undone by a later commit drop out automatically -- they are not in the final diff. The original commit messages are read first so the new topic split preserves the why of the work.
The previous tip of the branch is kept by git reflog (default 90 days), so the operation is non-destructive locally. Nothing is pushed.
Step 0 -- working copy must be clean
git status --porcelain
If the output is non-empty, STOP. Tell the user to commit, stash, or discard their pending edits first. A dirty tree would mix uncommitted work into the collapse and there is no clean way to un-mix afterwards. Do not improvise an auto-stash; the user may not want those edits in the regrouped history.
Step 1 -- Claude context must be clean
This task reads every commit message between origin/main and HEAD, plus the full accumulated diff, plus the per-file change set. That is heavy and benefits from a fresh context window so nothing important gets truncated mid-analysis.
Self-assess:
- Clean context -- this skill was invoked early in the conversation, with little prior tool use: proceed in-place.
- Dirty context -- there has been substantial prior work (many file reads, prior edits, long tool history): spawn a
general-purpose Agent and hand off steps 2-6 with a self-contained brief. The brief MUST include:
- the absolute repo path,
- the current branch name,
- the
origin/main SHA (git rev-parse origin/main),
- the explicit rules from "Hard rules" below (no push, no
--hard, no -i, no --no-verify),
- an instruction to surface the topic plan back to the user for confirmation before any commit.
When in doubt, prefer spawning the agent; the overhead is small and the failure mode of running out of context mid-analysis is bad (a half-grouped history with no record of the original intent).
Step 2 -- study the existing commits
Read full bodies, not just subjects:
git log origin/main..HEAD --pretty=format:'%n=== %h %an %ad%n%s%n%n%b'
git log origin/main..HEAD --name-status
For each commit capture:
- Stated intent (what the message says it did, and why).
- Whether it fixes / reverts / amends a previous commit on the same branch -- these are the "overwritten" changes the user wants to forget. They will not appear in the final diff but their messages still hint at the topic the eventual hunk belongs to.
- Which files / areas it touched.
Save the output, or at least your notes from it, somewhere reachable in step 4 -- once the reset happens these messages are still in the reflog but reading them again costs another pass.
Also useful when the branch is long or branchy:
git log origin/main..HEAD --merges
git log origin/main..HEAD --reverse --oneline
If there are merge commits, surface them to the user and ask whether to flatten -- this skill assumes a linear range.
Step 3 -- collapse to origin/main
The user's phrasing "soft reset" here means "non-destructive reset that preserves all changes". Use --mixed (the git default) so everything lands as unstaged working-tree changes -- that is what step 4 analyzes and step 5 selectively stages per topic:
git reset --mixed origin/main
Equivalent two-step that honors the literal "soft" wording:
git reset --soft origin/main
git reset HEAD --
After either form:
HEAD is at origin/main.- The working tree is unchanged.
git diff shows only the final combined effect of all the original commits. Intermediate / overwritten states are automatically gone.
Do NOT use git reset --hard here. --hard discards the working tree, which erases the entire point of the operation.
Step 4 -- group the diff by topic
git status
git diff --stat
git diff
Cluster the changes into logical topics:
- Re-read the commit messages from step 2 -- they encode the user's intended topics. Subjects that share a theme ("fix multiview", "fix multiview alignment", "follow-up to multiview") usually collapse into one topic.
- Numbered punch-list prefixes (e.g.
A11-A20, B1/B6/B10, E1/E13) often map directly onto the original task tracker's section -- preserve those groupings unless the diff says otherwise.
- A topic is "one logical change a reviewer can approve or revert as a unit". Aim for 2-6 topics on a typical feature branch; fewer is better as long as each remains coherent.
- If a single file has hunks belonging to different topics, plan for hunk-level staging in step 5.
Present the proposed split to the user before committing anything:
- Each topic: a draft subject line, optional body, and the list of files (or files-and-hunks for mixed files) it covers.
- Total file count covered vs.
git diff --stat total -- they must match.
Wait for the user to confirm or redirect. Do NOT silently regroup.
Step 5 -- commit each topic
Before the first commit, snapshot the pre-commit diff so step 6 can verify nothing was dropped:
git diff > /tmp/git-history-cleanup-target.diff
Then, for each topic in order:
-
Stage exactly that topic:
git add path/to/whole_topic_files
git add -p path/to/mixed_file
When git add -p is awkward to drive non-interactively, write per-hunk patches to disk and apply with git apply --cached <hunk.patch>. Do not paper over difficulty by lumping a mixed file into one topic if it really belongs to two -- that defeats the purpose of the skill.
-
Sanity check before committing:
git diff --cached
git diff
-
Commit using the project's style. For erhe (see CLAUDE.md "Committing changes with git"):
- Short subject, ideally under ~70 chars, focused on the why.
- Optional body for context.
- Trailer
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> when Claude drafted the message.
- Use a HEREDOC for multi-line messages.
-
Move on to the next topic.
Step 6 -- verify and stop
After the last topic commit, BOTH of these must hold:
git status
git diff origin/main..HEAD > /tmp/git-history-cleanup-after.diff
diff /tmp/git-history-cleanup-target.diff /tmp/git-history-cleanup-after.diff
The diff must be empty (or only differ in trailing whitespace). Equivalently, the total diff vs. origin/main must equal the diff captured before any topic commits.
If either check fails a hunk was dropped or duplicated. DO NOT rescue with a catch-all "misc" / "wip" commit -- that defeats the purpose. Find the missing hunk, decide which topic it belongs to, and either amend that topic's commit (only if it is the most recent one) or do a fresh git reset --mixed origin/main and re-run from step 5.
Show the user the new shortlog and stop:
git log origin/main..HEAD --oneline
Pushing is the user's call.
Hard rules
- Never
git push -- and especially never git push --force -- from this skill. The user decides when the new history goes out.
- Never
git reset --hard. The whole operation depends on the working tree being preserved by the reset.
- Never
git rebase -i. Interactive prompts cannot be driven from this tool.
- Never
--no-verify, --no-gpg-sign, or other hook / signing bypasses.
- Never create a "misc" / "wip" / "cleanup" catch-all commit to swallow leftover changes -- that defeats the purpose of the skill. Either every hunk belongs to a named topic, or step 6 must surface the gap to the user.
- Never amend a commit that was not created by this skill run. Amending commits the user already pushed elsewhere is destructive.
- If any check (step 0 clean tree, step 6 diff equality) fails, STOP and report. Do not improvise.
Recovery
If the user dislikes the new history, the previous tip is in the reflog:
git reflog | head -30
git reset --hard <old-tip-sha>
When reporting completion to the user, mention the old tip SHA explicitly (capture it from git rev-parse HEAD BEFORE the step-3 reset) so they know the safety net is one command away.
When NOT to use
- Branch has merge commits in
origin/main..HEAD that the user wants to preserve -- this skill assumes a linear range and would flatten the merge boundary.
- Branch has already been pushed and other people are working from it -- the resulting force-push would rewrite shared history. Confirm with the user that the branch is private before starting.
- There is no meaningful diff (
git log origin/main..HEAD --oneline | wc -l is 0 or 1, or git diff origin/main..HEAD is empty) -- there is nothing to clean up. Tell the user.
