| name | chart |
| description | Quick price-action read — quote, trend, recent bars, immediate context |
| argument-hint | EXCHANGE:TICKER [timeframe] |
Give a concise price-action read on: $ARGUMENTS
Before starting, read ../mcp-tools.md and ../presentation.md.
This is the lightweight "glance at the chart and tell me where we are" skill. Target output: ≤ 12 lines, no tables unless the user asks.
1. Parse arguments
- Symbol: resolve bare tickers with
mcp__tvremix__search_symbols.
- Timeframe: default
1D. Accept 1h / 4h / 1W.
2. Pull a minimal data set
mcp__tvremix__get_quote(symbol=<SYMBOL>)
mcp__tvremix__get_ohlcv(symbol=<SYMBOL>, interval=<TF>, count=60, summary=False)
mcp__tvremix__get_technicals(symbol=<SYMBOL>, interval=<TF>)
60 bars is enough to describe recent structure without drowning in data.
3. Describe, don't dump
Produce a paragraph (or a few short bullets) covering:
- Spot: current price, today's change %, volume vs average from the quote.
- Trend: up / down / sideways. Use the last ~20 bars. Confirm with SMA(20) vs SMA(50) positioning from technicals.
- Recent action: what happened in the last 5–10 bars? Breakout? Pullback? Range? Big impulsive candle?
- Nearest structural levels: the single most important S and R from the bars (the recent swing high + swing low usually suffices).
- Indicator tone: RSI, MACD state in one phrase each ("RSI 68 overbought", "MACD above signal, rising").
- Heads-up: anything immediate — approaching a major round level, big gap, earnings in < 7 days.
If earnings timing might matter, call mcp__tvremix__get_earnings_calendar(symbols=[<SYMBOL>]) — but only if a trade discussion seems likely.
4. Upsell to deeper skills
Finish with one line pointing at the right deep-dive skill:
- Structure question → "Run
/tvremix:smc <SYMBOL> <TF> for order blocks + FVG detail."
- Setup question → "Run
/tvremix:swing <SYMBOL> for Fib + R:R."
- Multiple TFs → "Run
/tvremix:confluence <SYMBOL> to see if all TFs agree."
- Levels only → "Run
/tvremix:levels <SYMBOL>."
Don't list all four — pick the most relevant one based on what the user just asked.
Don't
- Don't call the SMC or swing analyzers here — this is the fast lane. If the user wants depth, point them at the dedicated skill.
- Don't output a full table of bars — the user can see them on TradingView. Describe the shape, not the data.
- Don't speculate beyond what the data supports. "Could break out" needs a specific level; if you can't point to one, don't say it.