Improve a set of auto-generated GitHub release notes for an Umbraco CMS release. Cross-checks the notes against every PR carrying the release label, adds any that are missing, re-files every PR under the most appropriate category, and strips purely-internal entries. Use whenever the user asks to tidy up, improve, complete, or recategorize release notes for a given version, or mentions a release-notes text file plus a version number.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Improve a set of auto-generated GitHub release notes for an Umbraco CMS release. Cross-checks the notes against every PR carrying the release label, adds any that are missing, re-files every PR under the most appropriate category, and strips purely-internal entries. Use whenever the user asks to tidy up, improve, complete, or recategorize release notes for a given version, or mentions a release-notes text file plus a version number.
argument-hint
<version> <path-to-generated-notes-file>
Umbraco CMS - Improve Release Notes
Takes a file of auto-generated GitHub release notes and produces an improved version that:
Is complete — every merged PR carrying the release/<version> label appears.
Is well-categorized — every PR sits under the most appropriate heading.
Is free of noise — purely-internal entries of no value to a reader are removed.
The result is written to a new file alongside the input, so the user can diff the two.
Run autonomously. Do NOT use AskUserQuestion once the required arguments (version and input file path) are available — only ask if one of them is missing from $ARGUMENTS and cannot be inferred (see Arguments). Beyond that, make the categorization calls yourself using the rules below; if a handful are genuinely borderline, place them anyway and note the borderline ones in your closing summary so the user can override.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS contains two values:
Version — e.g. 17.5.0, . The GitHub label to search is (so version → label ).
18.1.0
release/<version>
17.5.0
release/17.5.0
Input file path — full path to the text file holding the auto-generated notes (e.g. C:\Temp\release-17.5.0-rc.md).
If either is missing, ask the user once for the missing value, then proceed.
Prerequisites
Run gh auth status. If it fails, tell the user to authenticate gh (e.g. gh auth login) and stop — the skill needs the GitHub CLI to query PRs. The repo is always umbraco/Umbraco-CMS.
Procedure
1. Read the input notes
Read the input file. Note its structure — it is GitHub's generated format:
A leading HTML comment (<!-- Release notes generated ... -->).
A ## What's Changed heading followed by ### <emoji> <Category> sub-headings, each with * <title> by @<author> in <url> bullets.
A trailing ## New Contributors section and a **Full Changelog**: ... line.
Extract the set of PR numbers already present (parse the /pull/<number> from each bullet). Preserve each existing bullet's exact text (title, author, URL) when you re-emit it — only its category placement may change.
This is the authoritative list of what the release should contain. Each row gives number, author, labels, title.
Guard against silent truncation.gh pr list caps at --limit without warning, so a large release could drop the overflow and the skill would still look "complete". Count the returned rows and compare against the limit:
gh pr list --repo umbraco/Umbraco-CMS --label "release/<version>" --state closed --limit 1000 --json number --jq 'length'
If this equals 1000, the limit was hit — raise --limit and re-fetch before continuing. Do not proceed on a truncated list.
3. Reconcile
Missing labelled PRs (labelled but not in the input file): these must be added. Build a bullet as * <title> by @<author> in https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco-CMS/pull/<number>.
Author handle.<author> in the template is the raw .author.login value — the bullet supplies the leading @, so do not prepend another. gh's .author.login already returns bot accounts with the [bot] suffix as part of the login — Dependabot comes back as dependabot[bot], not dependabot or app/dependabot (the app/ form only appears in git committer metadata and CODEOWNERS, never in gh's JSON). So the login is already in the right shape; use it verbatim (e.g. .author.login of dependabot[bot] renders as @dependabot[bot], matching what GitHub's generator wrote for the existing bullets). The only thing to guard against is accidentally stripping or altering the [bot] suffix.
PRs in the file but not labelled: keep them. The generated notes span a commit range (see the Full Changelog compare link), so they legitimately include backports / earlier-version PRs that lack the current label. For any of these you need to categorize, fetch its labels with:
Do not invent or alter the New Contributors section — carry it over verbatim. You cannot reliably recompute first-time contributors, so leave it as the generator produced it (mention this in the summary).
4. Categorize every PR
Use exactly these headings, in this order. Omit any heading that ends up with no entries.
Heading
What goes here
Primary signal
### 🙌 Notable Changes
Don't recategorize existing entries. Label-driven — but still add any missing PR carrying this label here.
label category/notable
### 💥 Breaking Changes
Don't recategorize existing entries. Label-driven — but still add any missing PR carrying this label here.
label category/breaking
### 📦 Dependencies
Dependency bumps
label dependencies; or dependabot author
### 🚀 New Features
New user- or developer-facing capability
label type/feature / category/feature; or title introduces/adds a genuinely new capability
### 🚤 Performance
Performance improvements
label category/performance; or Performance: title prefix
label category/test-automation / area/test; or E2E/QA/"acceptance tests"/"unit test coverage"/"add tests" titles
### 🛡️ Code Quality, Documentation and Refactoring
Refactors, deprecations, API tidy-ups, XML/MD documentation, knowledge-base (MD) updates
label category/refactor; or titles about refactoring, deprecating, renaming, documenting, constants extraction, MD/CLAUDE.md content
### 🧑💻 Developer Experience
Things that improve the experience of developers building on or contributing to Umbraco — dev tooling, build/watch ergonomics, test mocks/harnesses, backoffice dev utilities
Developer Experience title prefix; dev tooling; mock/harness changes
Rules:
Notable and Breaking are off-limits for recategorization — never move a PR that is already in the input file into or out of these sections; they are driven purely by their labels and the generator placed them correctly. This does not exempt them from completeness: a PR discovered as missing in step 3 that carries category/notable or category/breaking must still be added under the matching section.
Label signals beat title wording, except a Performance:/Developer Experience: title prefix is decisive for its section.
A PR with both type/feature and category/refactor whose title clearly describes a refactor (e.g. "swap relative imports", "re-export type") belongs under Code Quality, not New Features.
"Add ... tests"/"unit test coverage" → Testing, even if it also touches docs. If a PR adds XML documentation and tests, lead with where the title's emphasis lies (documentation → Code Quality; test coverage → Testing).
When a PR is genuinely 50/50, pick the more reader-useful heading and list it in your closing summary as borderline.
5. Remove purely-internal noise
Drop entries that have no value to anyone reading release notes — pure repository plumbing with no shipped impact. Examples:
Branch/merge maintenance ("Fix main branch after merge issue").
CI/pipeline fixes that don't change the product.
Reverts of changes that never shipped in a release.
Keep anything that ships in the product or genuinely helps developers building on Umbraco — that includes documentation/MD updates, dev tooling, and test mocks (those go to Code Quality or Developer Experience, they are not noise). When unsure whether something is noise, keep it and flag it in the summary rather than silently dropping it. List every removal in your closing summary.
6. Write the output
Write to a new file in the same folder as the input, named by appending - with updates before the extension:
Input C:\Temp\release-17.5.0-rc.md → Output C:\Temp\release-17.5.0-rc - with updates.md
Preserve the leading HTML comment, the ## What's Changed heading, the ## New Contributors section, and the **Full Changelog** line exactly. Only the ### <category> groupings and their bullets change.
7. Report
Give a concise summary:
Count of PRs added (with their numbers), and which categories they landed in.
Notable recategorizations (PRs moved out of the catch-all Bug Fixes into Features/Performance/Testing/etc.).
Every entry removed, with the one-line reason.
Any borderline calls the user may want to override.
The output file path.
Verification
Before reporting done, confirm:
Every PR number from step 2 is present in the output (except any you deliberately removed in step 5 — and those must be in the removal list).
No PR appears under more than one heading.
Notable and Breaking sections are byte-for-byte unchanged from the input.
The header comment, New Contributors, and Full Changelog lines are intact.
