| name | boundary-critique |
| description | Apply CSH boundary critique — what is included/excluded, who benefits/is harmed, what expertise is privileged/marginalized. Identifies opportunities at the boundaries. |
| dependencies | {"sops":["csh-12-question","deep-insight-assumption-surfacing"]} |
Boundary Critique
Critically examine what a method's boundaries include and exclude.
Budget
| Base SOP | Target | ±10% Range |
|---|
| web-search | 30 | 27–33 |
| web-research | 15 | 13–17 |
| paper-overview | 30 | 27–33 |
| paper-search | 20 | 18–22 |
| paper-research | 10 | 9–11 |
State Ledger
<HARD-GATE>
| SOP | Done | Target | % |
|-----|------|--------|---|
| web-search | ? | 30 | ? |
| web-research | ? | 15 | ? |
| paper-overview | ? | 30 | ? |
| paper-search | ? | 20 | ? |
| paper-research | ? | 10 | ? |
Budget Gate: OPEN/CLOSED (>=80% required to exit)
</HARD-GATE>
Available SOPs
Import: web-search, web-research, paper-overview, paper-search, paper-research
Subagent: csh-12-question (reused from insight)
Shared: assumption-surfacing
Execution Guidance
Apply CSH boundary critique to the method — what is included/excluded, who benefits/is harmed, what expertise is privileged/marginalized. Identify opportunities at the boundaries.
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|
| csh-12-question | Apply Ulrich's Critical Systems Heuristics 12 questions across 4 dimensions (motivation, control, expertise, legitimacy) comparing is vs ought. |
| deep-insight-assumption-surfacing | Systematically extract implicit assumptions from methods, frameworks, or arguments. Identifies what is taken for granted without explicit justification. |
